References
MOORE WS, ZIOMEK S, QUINONES-BALDRICH WJ, et al. Can clinical evaluation and noninvasive testing substitute for angiography in the evaluation of carotid artery disease?Ann Surg 1988;208:91–94.
ROBINSON ML, SACKS D, PERLMUTTER GS, et al. Diagnostic criteria for carotid duplex sonography.AJR 1988;151:1045–1049.
POLAK JF, DOBKIN GR, O'LEARY DH, et al. Internal carotid artery stenosis: accuracy and reproducibility of color Doppler-assisted duplex imaging.Radiology 1989;173:793–798.
O'DONNELL TF Jr, ERDOES L, MACKEY WC, et al. Correlation of B-mode ultrasound imaging and arteriography with pathologic findings at carotid endarterectomy.Arch Surg 1985;120:443–449.
STEINKE W, KLOETZSCH C, HENNERICI M. Carotid artery disease assessed by color Doppler flow imaging: correlation with standard Doppler sonography and angiography.AJNR 1990;11:259–266.
REILLY L, LUSBY R, HUGHES L, et al. Carotid plaque histology using real-time ultrasonography.Am J Surg 1983;146:188–193.
BLUTH EI, KAY D, MERRITT CRB, et al. Sonographic characterization of carotid plaque: detection of hemorrhage.AJR 1986;146:1061–1065.
O'LEARY DH, HOLEN J, ROCOTTA JJ, et al. Carotid bifurcation disease: prediction of ulceration with B-mode ultrasound.Radiology 1987;162:523–525.
GOODSON SF, FLANIGAN DP, BISHARA RA, et al. Can carotid duplex scanning supplant arteriography in patients with focal carotid territory symptoms.J Vasc Surg 1987;5:551–557.
JACOBS NM, GRANT EG, SCHELLINGER D, et al. Duplex carotid sonography: criteria for stenosis, accuracy and pitfalls.Radiology 1985;154:385–391.
HALLAM MJ, REID JM, COOPERBERG PL. Color-flow Doppler and conventional duplex scanning of the carotid bifurcation: prospective double-blind, correlative study.AJR 1989;152:1101–1105.
ERICKSON SJ, MEWISSEN MW, FOLEY WD, et al. Stenosis of the internal carotid artery: assessment using color Doppler imaging compared with angiography.AJR 1989;152:1299–1305.
OLIVECRONA H. Complications of cerebral angiography.Neuroradiology 1977;14:175–181.
HASS WK, FIELDS WS, NORTH RR, et al. Joint study of extracranial arterial occlusion. II. Arteriography, techniques, sites, and complications.JAMA 1968;203:159–166.
MANI RL, EISENBERG RL, MC DONALD EJ Jr, et al. Complications of catheter cerebral arteriography: analysis of 5,000 procedures. I. Criteria and incidence.AJR 1978;131:861–865.
SWANSON PD, CALANCHI PR, DYKEN ML, et al. A cooperative study of hospital frequency and character of transient ischemic attacks. II. Performance of angiography among six centers.JAMA 1977;237:2202–2206.
KERBER CW, CROMWELL LD, DRAYER BP, et al. Cerebral ischemia. I. Current angiographic techniques, complications, and safety.AJR 1977;130:1097–1103.
EARNEST F IV, FORBES G, SANDOK BA, et al. Complication of cerebral angiography: prospective assessment of risk.AJR 1984;142:247–253.
HOFFMAN MG, GOMES AS, PAIS SO. Limitations in the interpretation of intravenous carotid digital subtraction angiography.AJR 1984;142:261–264.
CHILCOTE WA, MODIC MT, PAVLICEK, et al. Digital subtraction angiography of the carotid arteries: a comparative study in 100 patients.Radiology 1981;139:287–295.
EARNEST F IV, HOUSER OW, FORBES GS, et al. The limitations of intravenous digital subtraction angiography in the evaluation of atherosclerotic cerebrovascular disease: angiographic and surgical correlation.Mayo Clin Proc 1983;58:735–746.
WOOD GW, LUKIN RR, TOMSICK TA, et al. Digital subtraction angiography with intravenous injection: assessment of 1,000 carotid bifurcations.AJR 1983;140:855–859.
PINTO RS, MANUELL M, KRICHEFF II. Complications of digital intravenous angiography: experience in 2488 cervicocranial examinations.AJR 1983;143:1295–1299.
McCREARY JA, SCHELLHAS KP, BRANT-ZAWADZKI M, et al. Outpatient DSA in cerebrovascular disease using transbrachial arch injections.AJNR 1985;6:795–801.
FERGUSSON DJG, KAMADA RD. Percutaneous entry of the brachial artery for left heart catheterization using a sheath: further experience.Cath Cardiovasc Diag 1986;12:209–211.
MAOUAD J, HEBERT JL, FERNANDEZ F, et al. Percutaneous brachial approach using the femoral artery sheath for left heart catheterization and selective coronary angiography.Cath Cardiovasc Diag 1985;11:539–546.
FIELD JR, LEE L, MC BURNEY RF. Complications of 1,000 brachial arteriograms.J Neurosurg 1972;36:324–332.
GAINES PA, REIDY JF. Percutaneous high brachial aortography: a safe alternative to the translumbar approach.Clin Radiol 1986;37:595–597.
BRANT-ZAWADZKI M. Outpatient DSA using transbrachial approach.AJR 1986;146:649.
BECKER GJ, KICKS ME, HOLDEN RW, et al. Screening for occlusive vascular disease with intraarterial DSA: preliminary experience with a high flow 4-F catheter.Radiology 1984;153:838.
HICKS ME, KREIPKE DL, BECKER GJ, et al. Cerebrovascular disease: evaluation with transbrachial intraarterial digital subtraction angiography using a 4-F catheter.Radiology 1986;161:545–546.
GRITTER KJ, LAIDLAW WW, PETERSON NT. Complications of outpatient transbrachial intraarterial digital subtraction angiography.Radiology 1987;162:125–127.
GROLLMAN JH, MARCUS R. Transbrachial arteriography: techniques and complications.Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 1988;11:32–35.
BARNETT FJ, LECKY DM, FREIMAN DB, et al. Cerebrovascular disease: outpatient evaluation with selective carotid DSA performed via a transbrachial approach.Radiology 1989:170:535–539.
KAHN PC, CALLOW AD. Catheter arteriography in the evaluation of abdominal aortic aneurysms.AJR 1966;98:879–887.
BREWSTER DC, RETANA A, WALTMAN AC, et al. Angiography in the management of aneurysms of the abdominal aorta.N Engl J Med 1975;292:822–825.
CYR R, TRUDEL J, RABBAT AG, et al. Angiography: an essential diagnostic aid in asymptomatic aortic aneurysm.Can J Surg 1977;20:57–59.
KWANN JH, CONNOLLY JE, MOLEN RV, et al. The value of arteriography before abdominal aneurysmectomy.Am J Surg 1977;134:108–114.
BAUR GM, PORTER JM, EIDEMULLER LR, et al. The role of aortography in abdominal aortic aneurysm.Am J Surg 1978;136:184–189.
ALEXANDER RH, EVANS MT, BLIKKEN WG. Angiography in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm.South Med J 1981;74:669–672.
BELL DD, GASPAR MR. Routine aortography before abdominal aneurysmectomy.Am J Surg 1982;144:191–193.
SATIANA B, VEAZEY CR, SMITH RB, et al. Preoperative aortography before abdominal aortic aneurysmectomy.Am Surg 1978;44:650–654.
NUMO IM, COLLINS GM, BARDIN JA, et al. Should aortography be used routinely in the elective management of abdominal aortic aneurysm?Am J Surg 1982;144:53–57.
COUCH NP, O'MAHONY J, MC IRVINE A, et al. The place of abdominal aortography in abdominal aneurysm resection.Arch Surg 1983;118:1029–1034.
PAPANLCOLAOU N, WITTENBERG J, FERRUCCI JT Jr, et al. Preoperative evaluation of abdominal aortic aneurysms by computed tomography.AJR 1986;146:711–715.
KOSLIN DB, KENNEY PJ, KELLER FS, et al. Preoperative evaluation of abdominal aortic aneurysm by MR imaging with aortography correlation.Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 1988;11:329–335.
KOZAK BE, BEDELL JE, ROSCH J. Small vessel leg angiography for distal vessel bypass grafts.J Vasc Surg 1988;8:711–715.
SMITH TP, CRAGG AH, BERBAUM KS, et al. Techniques for lower-limb angiography: a comparative study.Radiology 1990;174:951–955.
THOMAS ML, TANQUERAY AB, BURNAND KG. Visualization of the plantar arch by aortography: technique and value.Br J Radiol 1988;61:469–472.
CARDELLA JF, SMITH TP, DARCY MD, et al. Balloon occlusion femoral angiography prior to in-situ saphenous vein bypass.Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 1987;10:181–187.
CRUMMY AB, STEIGHORST MF, TURSKI PA, et al. Digital subtraction angiography: current status and use of intraarterial injection.Radiology 1982;145:303–307.
HESSEL SJ, ADAMS DF, ABRAMS HL. Complications of angiography.Radiology 1981;138:273–281.
SIGSTEDT B, LUNDERQUIST A. Complications of angiographic examinations.AJR 1978;130:455–460.
MOLNAR W, PAUL DJ. Complications of axillary arteriotomies.Radiology 1972;104:269–276.
LANG EK. A survey of the complications of percutaneous retrograde arteriography.Radiology 1963;81:257–263.
WADE GL, SMITH DC, MOHR LL. Follow-up of 50 consecutive angiograms: obtained utilizing puncture of prosthetic vascular grafts.Radiology 1983;146:663–664.
SMITH DC. Catheterization of prosthetic vascular grafts: acceptable technique (editorial).AJR 1984;143:1117–1118.
DA SILVA JR, ECKSTEIN MR, KELEMOURIDIS V, et al. Aortofemoral bypass grafts: safety of percutaneous puncture.J Vasc Surg 1984;1:642–645.
MANI RL. Aortofemoral graft catheterization (letter).AJR 1977;129:759.
FORMANEK G, FRECH RS, AMPLATZ K. Arterial thrombus formation during clinical percutaneous catheterization.Circulation 1990;41:833–839.
SIEGELMAN SS, CAPLAN LH, ANNES GP. Complications of catheter angiography: study with oscillometry and “pullout” angiograms.Radiology 1968;91:251–253.
ANTONOVIC R, ROSCH J, DOTTER CT. The value of systemic arterial heparinization in transfemoral angiography: a prospective study.AJR 1976;127:223–225.
DEBRUN GM, VINUELA FV, FOX AJ. Aspirin and systemic heparinization in diagnostic and interventional neuroradiology.AJR 1982;139:139–142.
WALLACE S, MEDELLIN H, DE JONGH D. et al. Systemic heparinization for angiography.AJR 1972;116:204–209.
JUDY PF, ZIMMERMAN RE. Dose to critical organs. In: McNEIL BJ, ABRAMS HL (eds).Brigham and Women's Hospital Handbook of Diagnostic Imaging. Boston: Little Brown, 1986; 318–324.
PAVLICEK W, WEINSTEIN MA, MODIC MT, et al. Patient doses during digital subtraction angiography of the carotid arteries: comparison with conventional angiography.Radiology 1982;145:683–685.
American College of Radiology. ACR policies relating to clinical standards of patient care. 1989, p. I-S-1-3.
PENDERGRASS HP, TONDREAU RL, PENDERGRASS EP, et al. Reactions associated with intravenous urography: historical and statistical review.Radiology 1958;71:1–12.
WOLFROMM R, DEHOUVE A, DEGAND F, et al. Les accidents graves par injection intraveineuse de substances iodees pour urographie.J Radiol Electrol 1966;47:346–357.
ANSELL G. Adverse reactions to contrast agents: scope of problem.Invest Radiol 1970;5:374–384.
WITTEN DM, HIRSCH FD, HARTMAN GW. Acute reactions to urographic contrast medium: incidence, clinical characteristics and relationship to history of hypersensitivity states.AJR 1973;119:832–840.
SHEHADI WH. Adverse reactions to intravascularly administered contrast media: a comprehensive study based on a prospective survey.AJR 1975;124:125–152.
KATAYAMA H, YAMAGUCHI K, KOZUKA T, et al. Adverse reactions to ionic and nonionic contrast media.Radiology 1990;175:621–628.
PALMER FJ. The RACR survey of intravenous contrast media reactions: final report.Aust Radiol 1988;32:426–428.
WOLF GL, ARENSON RL, CROSS AP. A prospective trial of ionic vs nonionic contrast agents in routine clinical practice: comparison of adverse effects.AJR 1989;152:939–944.
LASSER EC. Pretreatment with corticosteroids to prevent reactions to IV contrast material: overview and implications.AJR 1988;150:257–259.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
About this article
Cite this article
Kozak, B.E. Diagnostic Imaging In Peripheral Vascular Disease. Annals of Vascular Surgery 6, 393–401 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02008800
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02008800