Skip to main content
Log in

Diagnostic Imaging In Peripheral Vascular Disease

  • Basic Data Underlying Decision-Making In Vascular Surgery
  • Published:
Annals of Vascular Surgery

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. MOORE WS, ZIOMEK S, QUINONES-BALDRICH WJ, et al. Can clinical evaluation and noninvasive testing substitute for angiography in the evaluation of carotid artery disease?Ann Surg 1988;208:91–94.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. ROBINSON ML, SACKS D, PERLMUTTER GS, et al. Diagnostic criteria for carotid duplex sonography.AJR 1988;151:1045–1049.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. POLAK JF, DOBKIN GR, O'LEARY DH, et al. Internal carotid artery stenosis: accuracy and reproducibility of color Doppler-assisted duplex imaging.Radiology 1989;173:793–798.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. O'DONNELL TF Jr, ERDOES L, MACKEY WC, et al. Correlation of B-mode ultrasound imaging and arteriography with pathologic findings at carotid endarterectomy.Arch Surg 1985;120:443–449.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. STEINKE W, KLOETZSCH C, HENNERICI M. Carotid artery disease assessed by color Doppler flow imaging: correlation with standard Doppler sonography and angiography.AJNR 1990;11:259–266.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. REILLY L, LUSBY R, HUGHES L, et al. Carotid plaque histology using real-time ultrasonography.Am J Surg 1983;146:188–193.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. BLUTH EI, KAY D, MERRITT CRB, et al. Sonographic characterization of carotid plaque: detection of hemorrhage.AJR 1986;146:1061–1065.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. O'LEARY DH, HOLEN J, ROCOTTA JJ, et al. Carotid bifurcation disease: prediction of ulceration with B-mode ultrasound.Radiology 1987;162:523–525.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. GOODSON SF, FLANIGAN DP, BISHARA RA, et al. Can carotid duplex scanning supplant arteriography in patients with focal carotid territory symptoms.J Vasc Surg 1987;5:551–557.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. JACOBS NM, GRANT EG, SCHELLINGER D, et al. Duplex carotid sonography: criteria for stenosis, accuracy and pitfalls.Radiology 1985;154:385–391.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. HALLAM MJ, REID JM, COOPERBERG PL. Color-flow Doppler and conventional duplex scanning of the carotid bifurcation: prospective double-blind, correlative study.AJR 1989;152:1101–1105.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. ERICKSON SJ, MEWISSEN MW, FOLEY WD, et al. Stenosis of the internal carotid artery: assessment using color Doppler imaging compared with angiography.AJR 1989;152:1299–1305.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. OLIVECRONA H. Complications of cerebral angiography.Neuroradiology 1977;14:175–181.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. HASS WK, FIELDS WS, NORTH RR, et al. Joint study of extracranial arterial occlusion. II. Arteriography, techniques, sites, and complications.JAMA 1968;203:159–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. MANI RL, EISENBERG RL, MC DONALD EJ Jr, et al. Complications of catheter cerebral arteriography: analysis of 5,000 procedures. I. Criteria and incidence.AJR 1978;131:861–865.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. SWANSON PD, CALANCHI PR, DYKEN ML, et al. A cooperative study of hospital frequency and character of transient ischemic attacks. II. Performance of angiography among six centers.JAMA 1977;237:2202–2206.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. KERBER CW, CROMWELL LD, DRAYER BP, et al. Cerebral ischemia. I. Current angiographic techniques, complications, and safety.AJR 1977;130:1097–1103.

    Google Scholar 

  18. EARNEST F IV, FORBES G, SANDOK BA, et al. Complication of cerebral angiography: prospective assessment of risk.AJR 1984;142:247–253.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. HOFFMAN MG, GOMES AS, PAIS SO. Limitations in the interpretation of intravenous carotid digital subtraction angiography.AJR 1984;142:261–264.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. CHILCOTE WA, MODIC MT, PAVLICEK, et al. Digital subtraction angiography of the carotid arteries: a comparative study in 100 patients.Radiology 1981;139:287–295.

    Google Scholar 

  21. EARNEST F IV, HOUSER OW, FORBES GS, et al. The limitations of intravenous digital subtraction angiography in the evaluation of atherosclerotic cerebrovascular disease: angiographic and surgical correlation.Mayo Clin Proc 1983;58:735–746.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. WOOD GW, LUKIN RR, TOMSICK TA, et al. Digital subtraction angiography with intravenous injection: assessment of 1,000 carotid bifurcations.AJR 1983;140:855–859.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. PINTO RS, MANUELL M, KRICHEFF II. Complications of digital intravenous angiography: experience in 2488 cervicocranial examinations.AJR 1983;143:1295–1299.

    Google Scholar 

  24. McCREARY JA, SCHELLHAS KP, BRANT-ZAWADZKI M, et al. Outpatient DSA in cerebrovascular disease using transbrachial arch injections.AJNR 1985;6:795–801.

    Google Scholar 

  25. FERGUSSON DJG, KAMADA RD. Percutaneous entry of the brachial artery for left heart catheterization using a sheath: further experience.Cath Cardiovasc Diag 1986;12:209–211.

    Google Scholar 

  26. MAOUAD J, HEBERT JL, FERNANDEZ F, et al. Percutaneous brachial approach using the femoral artery sheath for left heart catheterization and selective coronary angiography.Cath Cardiovasc Diag 1985;11:539–546.

    Google Scholar 

  27. FIELD JR, LEE L, MC BURNEY RF. Complications of 1,000 brachial arteriograms.J Neurosurg 1972;36:324–332.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. GAINES PA, REIDY JF. Percutaneous high brachial aortography: a safe alternative to the translumbar approach.Clin Radiol 1986;37:595–597.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. BRANT-ZAWADZKI M. Outpatient DSA using transbrachial approach.AJR 1986;146:649.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. BECKER GJ, KICKS ME, HOLDEN RW, et al. Screening for occlusive vascular disease with intraarterial DSA: preliminary experience with a high flow 4-F catheter.Radiology 1984;153:838.

    Google Scholar 

  31. HICKS ME, KREIPKE DL, BECKER GJ, et al. Cerebrovascular disease: evaluation with transbrachial intraarterial digital subtraction angiography using a 4-F catheter.Radiology 1986;161:545–546.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. GRITTER KJ, LAIDLAW WW, PETERSON NT. Complications of outpatient transbrachial intraarterial digital subtraction angiography.Radiology 1987;162:125–127.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. GROLLMAN JH, MARCUS R. Transbrachial arteriography: techniques and complications.Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 1988;11:32–35.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. BARNETT FJ, LECKY DM, FREIMAN DB, et al. Cerebrovascular disease: outpatient evaluation with selective carotid DSA performed via a transbrachial approach.Radiology 1989:170:535–539.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. KAHN PC, CALLOW AD. Catheter arteriography in the evaluation of abdominal aortic aneurysms.AJR 1966;98:879–887.

    Google Scholar 

  36. BREWSTER DC, RETANA A, WALTMAN AC, et al. Angiography in the management of aneurysms of the abdominal aorta.N Engl J Med 1975;292:822–825.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. CYR R, TRUDEL J, RABBAT AG, et al. Angiography: an essential diagnostic aid in asymptomatic aortic aneurysm.Can J Surg 1977;20:57–59.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. KWANN JH, CONNOLLY JE, MOLEN RV, et al. The value of arteriography before abdominal aneurysmectomy.Am J Surg 1977;134:108–114.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. BAUR GM, PORTER JM, EIDEMULLER LR, et al. The role of aortography in abdominal aortic aneurysm.Am J Surg 1978;136:184–189.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. ALEXANDER RH, EVANS MT, BLIKKEN WG. Angiography in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm.South Med J 1981;74:669–672.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. BELL DD, GASPAR MR. Routine aortography before abdominal aneurysmectomy.Am J Surg 1982;144:191–193.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. SATIANA B, VEAZEY CR, SMITH RB, et al. Preoperative aortography before abdominal aortic aneurysmectomy.Am Surg 1978;44:650–654.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. NUMO IM, COLLINS GM, BARDIN JA, et al. Should aortography be used routinely in the elective management of abdominal aortic aneurysm?Am J Surg 1982;144:53–57.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. COUCH NP, O'MAHONY J, MC IRVINE A, et al. The place of abdominal aortography in abdominal aneurysm resection.Arch Surg 1983;118:1029–1034.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. PAPANLCOLAOU N, WITTENBERG J, FERRUCCI JT Jr, et al. Preoperative evaluation of abdominal aortic aneurysms by computed tomography.AJR 1986;146:711–715.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. KOSLIN DB, KENNEY PJ, KELLER FS, et al. Preoperative evaluation of abdominal aortic aneurysm by MR imaging with aortography correlation.Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 1988;11:329–335.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. KOZAK BE, BEDELL JE, ROSCH J. Small vessel leg angiography for distal vessel bypass grafts.J Vasc Surg 1988;8:711–715.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. SMITH TP, CRAGG AH, BERBAUM KS, et al. Techniques for lower-limb angiography: a comparative study.Radiology 1990;174:951–955.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. THOMAS ML, TANQUERAY AB, BURNAND KG. Visualization of the plantar arch by aortography: technique and value.Br J Radiol 1988;61:469–472.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. CARDELLA JF, SMITH TP, DARCY MD, et al. Balloon occlusion femoral angiography prior to in-situ saphenous vein bypass.Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 1987;10:181–187.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. CRUMMY AB, STEIGHORST MF, TURSKI PA, et al. Digital subtraction angiography: current status and use of intraarterial injection.Radiology 1982;145:303–307.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. HESSEL SJ, ADAMS DF, ABRAMS HL. Complications of angiography.Radiology 1981;138:273–281.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. SIGSTEDT B, LUNDERQUIST A. Complications of angiographic examinations.AJR 1978;130:455–460.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. MOLNAR W, PAUL DJ. Complications of axillary arteriotomies.Radiology 1972;104:269–276.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. LANG EK. A survey of the complications of percutaneous retrograde arteriography.Radiology 1963;81:257–263.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. WADE GL, SMITH DC, MOHR LL. Follow-up of 50 consecutive angiograms: obtained utilizing puncture of prosthetic vascular grafts.Radiology 1983;146:663–664.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. SMITH DC. Catheterization of prosthetic vascular grafts: acceptable technique (editorial).AJR 1984;143:1117–1118.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. DA SILVA JR, ECKSTEIN MR, KELEMOURIDIS V, et al. Aortofemoral bypass grafts: safety of percutaneous puncture.J Vasc Surg 1984;1:642–645.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. MANI RL. Aortofemoral graft catheterization (letter).AJR 1977;129:759.

    Google Scholar 

  60. FORMANEK G, FRECH RS, AMPLATZ K. Arterial thrombus formation during clinical percutaneous catheterization.Circulation 1990;41:833–839.

    Google Scholar 

  61. SIEGELMAN SS, CAPLAN LH, ANNES GP. Complications of catheter angiography: study with oscillometry and “pullout” angiograms.Radiology 1968;91:251–253.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. ANTONOVIC R, ROSCH J, DOTTER CT. The value of systemic arterial heparinization in transfemoral angiography: a prospective study.AJR 1976;127:223–225.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. DEBRUN GM, VINUELA FV, FOX AJ. Aspirin and systemic heparinization in diagnostic and interventional neuroradiology.AJR 1982;139:139–142.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. WALLACE S, MEDELLIN H, DE JONGH D. et al. Systemic heparinization for angiography.AJR 1972;116:204–209.

    Google Scholar 

  65. JUDY PF, ZIMMERMAN RE. Dose to critical organs. In: McNEIL BJ, ABRAMS HL (eds).Brigham and Women's Hospital Handbook of Diagnostic Imaging. Boston: Little Brown, 1986; 318–324.

    Google Scholar 

  66. PAVLICEK W, WEINSTEIN MA, MODIC MT, et al. Patient doses during digital subtraction angiography of the carotid arteries: comparison with conventional angiography.Radiology 1982;145:683–685.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. American College of Radiology. ACR policies relating to clinical standards of patient care. 1989, p. I-S-1-3.

  68. PENDERGRASS HP, TONDREAU RL, PENDERGRASS EP, et al. Reactions associated with intravenous urography: historical and statistical review.Radiology 1958;71:1–12.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. WOLFROMM R, DEHOUVE A, DEGAND F, et al. Les accidents graves par injection intraveineuse de substances iodees pour urographie.J Radiol Electrol 1966;47:346–357.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. ANSELL G. Adverse reactions to contrast agents: scope of problem.Invest Radiol 1970;5:374–384.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. WITTEN DM, HIRSCH FD, HARTMAN GW. Acute reactions to urographic contrast medium: incidence, clinical characteristics and relationship to history of hypersensitivity states.AJR 1973;119:832–840.

    Google Scholar 

  72. SHEHADI WH. Adverse reactions to intravascularly administered contrast media: a comprehensive study based on a prospective survey.AJR 1975;124:125–152.

    Google Scholar 

  73. KATAYAMA H, YAMAGUCHI K, KOZUKA T, et al. Adverse reactions to ionic and nonionic contrast media.Radiology 1990;175:621–628.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. PALMER FJ. The RACR survey of intravenous contrast media reactions: final report.Aust Radiol 1988;32:426–428.

    Google Scholar 

  75. WOLF GL, ARENSON RL, CROSS AP. A prospective trial of ionic vs nonionic contrast agents in routine clinical practice: comparison of adverse effects.AJR 1989;152:939–944.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. LASSER EC. Pretreatment with corticosteroids to prevent reactions to IV contrast material: overview and implications.AJR 1988;150:257–259.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

About this article

Cite this article

Kozak, B.E. Diagnostic Imaging In Peripheral Vascular Disease. Annals of Vascular Surgery 6, 393–401 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02008800

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02008800

Keywords

Navigation