Skip to main content
Log in

Vena cava filter disruption and central migration due to accidental guidewire manipulation: A case report

  • Case Reports
  • Published:
Annals of Vascular Surgery

Abstract

Vena cava filters are now widely used as a safe and effective means of reducing the risk of pulmonary embolus in patients hospitalized with acute stroke or trauma. We report a case of traumatic disruption of a vena cava filter resulting from guidewire manipulation with migration of the main structure to the heart after successful initial placement of the filter.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Greenfield LJ, Stewart J, Crute S. Improved technique for insertion of Greenfield vena cava filters. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1983;156:217–219.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Greenfield LJ, Payton R, Crute S, et al. Greenfield vena caval filter experience. Arch Surg 1981;116:1451–1456.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Taylor FL, Auh MH, Kahn CE, et al. Vena-Tech vena cava filter: Experience and early follow-up. J Vasc Intervent Radiol 1991;2:435–440.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Ricco JB, Crochet D, Sebilothe P, et al. Percutaneous transvenous caval interruption with “LGM” filter: Early results of a multicenter trial. Ann Vasc Surg 1988;3:242–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Jones B, Fink JA, Donovan DL, et al. Analysis of benefit of anticoagulation after placement of Kimray-Greenfield filter. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1989;169:400–402.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Castaneda F, Herrera M, Cragg AH, et al. Migration of Kimray-Greenfield filter to the right ventricle. Radiology 1983;149:690.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Loesberg A, Taylor FC, Auh MH. Dislodgment of inferior vena caval filter during “blind” insertion of central venous catheters. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1994;161:637–638.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Alexander JJ, Gewertz BL, Zarius CK. Intraoperative disruption of a Greenfield vena cava filter. J Cardiovasc Surg 1989;30:132–133.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Auh MH, Taylor FC, Lu CT. Spontaneous fracture of a Vena-Tech inferior vena cava filter. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1991;157:177–178.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Carabasi RA, Moritz MJ, Jarrell BE. Complications encountered with the use of Greenfield filter. Am J Surg 1987;154:163–168.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Friedell ML, Goldenkranz RJ, Parsonnet V, et al. Migration of a Greenfield filter to the pulmonary artery: A case report. J Vasc Surg 1986;3:929–931.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Gelbfish GA, Ascer E. Intracardiac and intrapulmonary Greenfield filters: A long-term follow-up. J Vasc Surg 1991;14:614–617.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

About this article

Cite this article

Granke, K., Abraham, F.M. & McDowell, D.E. Vena cava filter disruption and central migration due to accidental guidewire manipulation: A case report. Annals of Vascular Surgery 10, 49–53 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02002341

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02002341

Keywords

Navigation