Notes
Mary Seale Vásquez, “Rosario Castellanos, Image and Idea”, inHomenaje a Rosario Castellanos, edited by Maureen Ahern and Mary Seale Vásquez (Valencia, 1980), pp. 15–40 (p. 37).
A detailed résumé of the events of 1867 is given by María del Carmen Millán, “En torno aOficio de tinieblas”,Anuario de Letras, UNAM, 3 (1963), 287–99 (pp. 292–93).
Emmanuel Carballo, “Rosario Castellanos: la historia de sus libros contada por ella misma”,La Cultura en México, 19 December 1962, p. 5.
This is emphasized by Guillermo Verdín Díaz,Introducción al estilo indirecto libre en español (Madrid, 1970), especially p. 170.
In my analysis of these modes of discourse I found very helpful the examination of the matter in John Rutherford,Leopoldo Alas: La Regenta (London, 1974), pp. 58–64.
“Myth inOficio de tinieblas” (unpublished Master's dissertation, University of Texas, Austin, 1967), pp. 48–50.
Rosario Castellanos,Balún-canan, 2nd edition (Mexico, 1961). See especially pp. 106–07, 174, and 178.
Rosario Castellanos,Oficio de tinieblas, 5th edition (Mexico, 1977), p. 53. All subsequent references are to this edition and are incorporated in the text. Quotations illustrating the various interiorizing modes of discourse will be set apart so that the original punctuation and layout remains evident.
After the Storm: Landmarks of the Modern Mexican Novel (Albuquerque, 1968), p. 169.
“The Indian-oriented Novel in Latin America: New Spirit, New Forms, New Scope”,Journal of Inter-American Studies, 6 (1964), 249–65 (p. 262).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Dorward, F.R. The function of interiorization inOficio de tinieblas . Neophilologus 69, 374–385 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02001050
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02001050