Advertisement

Combustion, Explosion and Shock Waves

, Volume 32, Issue 4, pp 390–394 | Cite as

Comparison of different methods of modeling turbulent combustion in a boundary layer

  • É. P. Volchkov
  • N. A. Dvornikov
  • L. N. Perepechko
Article

Abstract

Three methods of modeling a chemical reaction in the combustion of ethanol injected into the boundary layer through a porous plate are compared. In calculations of the average velocity and temperature and also heat-transfer coefficients, simple models of combustion are shown to be close in accuracy to a model that takes into complete account the kinetics of all reactions occurring during combustion. Simple models fail to determine the composition of reaction products, and it is necessary to take into account the formation rate of each substance entrained in combustion.

Keywords

Combustion Physical Chemistry Boundary Layer Dynamical System Simple Model 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    B. F. Boyarshinov, E. P. Volchkov, V. I. Terekhov, and S. A. Shutov, “Turbulent boundary layer with the injection of reactive materials,”Fiz. Goreniya Vzryva,17, No. 6, 21–28 (1981).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    D. Miloyevich, “Calculation of gas-fuel combustion in a cylindrical eddy chamber,” in:High Temperature Flows and Heat Exchange [in Russian], Inst. of Thermal Physics, Sib. Div., Acad. of Sci. of the USSR, Novosibirsk (1990), pp. 106–122.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    É. P. Volkov and N. Yu. Kudryavtsev, “Modeling of the formation of nitrogen oxides in a turbulent diffusion flame,”Inzh.-Fiz. Zh.,56, No. 6, 885–893 (1989).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    P. Hutchinson, E. E. Khalil, J. H. Whitelaw, and G. Wigly, “The calculation of furnace flow properties and their experimental verification,”Trans. ASME, Ser. C,98, 276–283 (1976).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    W. P. Jones and B. E. Launder, “The prediction of laminarization with a 2-equation model of turbulence,”Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer,15, 301–314 (1972).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    P. A. Libby and F. Williams (eds.),Turbulent Reacting Flows, Springer-Verlag, Berlin-Heidelberg-New York (1980).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    C. K. Westbrook and F. L. Dryer, “Chemical kinetic modeling of hydrocarbon combustion,”Prog. Energy Combust. Sci.,10, 1–57 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    S. Patankar and D. Spaulding,Heat and Mass Transfer in Boundary Layers, Morgan-Grampian, London (1967).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    B. F. Boyarhinov, É. P. Volchkov, and V. I. Terekhov, “Flow structure and heat and mass transfer in a boundary layer with a combustion front,” In:Transfer Processes in Single- and Two-Phase Media [in Russian], Inst. of Thermal Physics, Sib. Div., Acad. of Sci. of the USSR, Novosibirsk (1986), pp. 88–97.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    B. F. Boyarshinov, Heat and Mass Transfer in a Boundary Layer in Ethanol Evaporation and Combustion, Candidate's Dissertation, Novosibirsk (1988).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  • É. P. Volchkov
    • 1
  • N. A. Dvornikov
    • 1
  • L. N. Perepechko
    • 1
  1. 1.Kutateladze Institute of Thermal Physics, Siberian DivisionRussian Academy of SciencesNovosibirsk

Personalised recommendations