Skip to main content
Log in

Effectiveness of preventing flowering of hawthorn in protecting pear orchards from fire blight infection

  • Articles
  • Published:
Netherlands Journal of Plant Pathology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Since 1984 when a new Ministerial Regulation on fire blight came into force, there have been 20 ‘protected regions’ in the Netherlands, where nurseries of rosaceous plants, and pear and apple orchards are extra protected against fire blight. This policy is also necessary to meet the requirements of the European Community (EC) on fire blight. Two of the measures in the protected regions are the prohibition of flowering of the native hawthorn (Crataegus monogyna andC. laevigata), and destruction of blighted plants. In the unprotected regions, flowering is allowed, and destruction of blighted plants is limited to a zone of 500 metres around orchards.

For three years, the effectiveness of preventing flowering of hawthorn in protecting pear orchards against fire blight infection was studied in the field. Five test areas of about 3 km × 3 km were chosen with hawthorns and pear orchards. Two of these areas were in protected regions and three in unprotected regions. The more than 50 000 hawthorns in the areas were grouped into 1125 sites of hawthorn. The 126 orchards larger than 0.2 ha contained about 180 000 trees.

During the three years light to moderate epidemics of fire blight were observed in the regions. Fire blight occurred in 2.3% of the non-flowering sites and 19.8% of the flowering (or fruiting) sites at least once in 1987, 1988 or 1989. The prohibition of flowering for hawthorn in protected areas was rather well implemented, so that in protected areas a smaller proportion of sites of hawthorns had fire blight (4.1%) than in unprotected areas (14%). Moreover, there were fewer sites per square kilometre in the protected areas (13) than in the unprotected areas (26).

In protected areas, 53% and in unprotected areas 59% of the pear orchards had fire blight during 1987, 1988 or 1989. The difference was not significant. The first reason for the ineffectiveness of the preventing of flowering prevention in hawthorn to control fire blight in pear orchards was the inadequate hygiene of the pear orchards in both types of region. If it be assumed that a new focus is most probably initiated by the nearest existing focus, the second reason was that fire blight hardly spread from hawthorn to pear in the period of this study. Spread of fire blight within pear orchards and between pear orchards occurred frequently.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baumm, L.H., 1985. Praxisorientierte Untersuchungen zum Auftreten der Feuerbrandkrankheit (Erwinia amylovora (Burrill) Winslow et al.) im Obstanbaugebiet an der Niederelbe. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Hamburg, Germany. 160 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bech-Andersen, J., 1973. The relationship between fireblight in fruit trees and hawthorn in Denmark. 2nd International Congress of Plant Pathology, Minneapolis. Abstract of papers, No. 0749.

  • Billing, E., 1981. Hawthorn as a source of the fireblight bacterium for pear, apple and ornamental hosts. In: Thresh, J.M. (Ed.), Pests, pathogens and vegetation. The role of weeds and wild plants in the ecology of crop pests and diseases. Pitman, Boston, etc., p. 121–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Wael, L., 1988. De honingbij als mogelijke vector vanErwinia amylovora (Burr.) Winslow et al. Ph.D. Thesis, Agricultural University, Belgium. 190 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glasscock, H.H., 1971. Fire blight epidemic among Kentish apple orchards in 1969. Annals of Applied Biology 69: 137–145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gregory, P.H., 1968. Interpreting plant disease dispersal gradients. Annual Review of Phytopathology 6: 189–212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grizzle, J.E., Starmer, C.F. & Koch, G.G., 1969. Analysis of categorical data by linear models. Biometrics 25: 489–504.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Meijneke, C.A.R., 1967. Fireblight: an isolated outbreak in the Netherlands. EPPO-Publications, Series A, no. 45-E: 17–19.

  • Meijneke, C.A.R., 1984. The new fireblight control policy in the Netherlands. Acta Horticulturae 151: 325–328.

    Google Scholar 

  • Netherlands, 1984. Beschikking bestrijding bacterievuur 1984. Staatscourant 1984, 57: 4–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Netherlands, 1991. Wijziging Beschikking bestrijding bacterievuur. Staatscourant 1991, 51: 14–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norelli, J.L., Aldwinckle, H.S., Lamb, R.C. & Beer, S.V., 1984. Differential virulence ofErwinia amylovora to specific apple cultivars and its implications for breeding and selecting fire blight resistant plants. Acta Horticulturae 151: 255–258.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, M., Epton, H.A.S. & Sigee, D.C., 1987. Ultrastructural studies on fire blight of hawthorn flowers. Acta Horticulturae 217: 189–194.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schouten, H.J. Effectiveness of preventing flowering of hawthorn in protecting pear orchards from fire blight infection. Netherlands Journal of Plant Pathology 98, 21–32 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01998075

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01998075

Additional keywords

Navigation