Studies on the effectiveness of H1-+H2-antagonist combinations in preventing life-threatening anaphylactoid reactions in anaesthesia and surgery: Problems with selecting the animal model from clinical data and with “equi-effective” doses
- 19 Downloads
Animal models are necessary for studies on the effectiveness of histamine H1- + H2-receptor antagonists in preventing life-threatening anaphylactoid reactions in anaesthesia and surgery. Clinical data were presented here for the first time which showed a clear correlation between the severe haemodynamic changes (shock and death) and plasma histamine levels.
A dog model was developed which best resembled the clinical situation and was remarkably successful in showing the effectiveness of the H1- + H2-antagonist combination dimetindene and cimetidine compared to dimetindene (H1) alone and to low and high-dose corticosteroids. However, this model is no longer feasible after the new German Animal Protection Law in 1986.
A piglet model was developed which was handicapped from the beginning by respiratory depression induced by compound 48/80 independently of histamine release. A dose had to be chosen which mostly induced only systemic histamine release reactions (grade 2), not life-threatening reactions (grade 3) confounded by respiratory distress. In addition, basal plasma histamine levels were higher than in man by one order of magnitude. however, the advantage of the piglet model was the influence of histamine on the heart rate which is similar to that in humans.
In a randomized trial, the combination of dimetindene and cimetidine was superior to that of dimetindene and ranitidine or famotidine, respectively. The problem of “equieffective” doses in this field is discussed: separate clinical trials are necessary to demonstrate the effectiveness of each combination in preventing most sufficiently life-threatening reactions.
KeywordsHistamine Cimetidine Ranitidine Respiratory Depression Histamine Release
- W. Lorenz, W. Dietz, M. Ennis, B. Stinner and A. Doenicke,Histamine in anaesthesia and surgery: Causality analysis. InHandbook of Experimental Pharmacology, Vol. 97 (Ed. B. Uvnäs) pp. 385–439, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg 1991.Google Scholar
- D. Duda, H. Menke, W. Lorenz, M. S. Rugeles, B. Stinner, D. Weber, B. Kapp, T. Junginger and W. Dick,Histamine release during induction of anaesthesia and prepation for operation in patients undergoing general surgery: Incidence and clinically severe cases. Agents and Actions (in press).Google Scholar
- W. Lorenz, A. Doenicke, B. Schöning and E. Neugebauer,The role of histamine in adverse reactions to intravenous agents. InAdverse Reactions of Anaesthetic Drugs (Ed. A. Thornton) pp. 169–238, North Holland Biomedical Press, Elsevier 1981.Google Scholar
- W. Dietz, H. Lennartz, I. Köpf, A. Schmal, U. Kaiser and W. Lorenz,Lebensbedrohliche anaphylaktoide Reaktionen im perioperativen Zeitraum: Blockade durch Histamin H1- + H2-Antagonisten oder Methylprednisolon? Langenbecks Arch. Chir. Suppl. Chir. Forum 333–337 (1987).Google Scholar
- W. Lorenz and A. Doenicke, H1- + H2-blockade: a prophylactic principle in anaesthesia and surgery against histamine-reiease responses of any degree of severity, New Engl. Reg. Allergy Proc. Part I:6, 37–57 (1985), Part II:6, 174–194 (1985).Google Scholar
- A. M. Rothschild,The pharmacology of compound 48/80. In Histamine Release by Basic Compounds. InHandbook of Experimental. Pharmacology, vol. 18/1 (Ed. M. Rocha e Silva) pp. 421–430, Springer Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York 1966.Google Scholar
- J. Sattler, D. Häfner, H.-J. Klotter, W. Lorenz and P. K. Wagner,Food-induced histaminosis as an epidemiological problem: plasma histamine elevation and haemodynamic alterations after oral histamine administration and blockade of diamine oxidase (DAO). Agents and Actions23, 361–365 (1988).PubMedGoogle Scholar