Skip to main content
Log in

Local error estimation for singly-implicit formulas by two-step Runge-Kutta methods

  • Part II Numerical Mathematics
  • Published:
BIT Numerical Mathematics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper it is shown that the local discretization error ofs-stage singly-implicit methods of orderp can be estimated by embedding these methods intos-stage two-step Runge-Kutta methods of orderp+1, wherep=s orp=s+1. These error estimates do not require any extra evaluations of the right hand side of the differential equations. This is in contrast with the error estimation schemes based on embedded pairs of two singly-implicit methods proposed by Burrage.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. K. Burrage,A special family of Runge-Kutta methods for solving stiff differential equations, BIT 18 (1978), 22–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. K. Burrage,Efficiently implementable algebraically stable Runge-Kutta methods, SIAM J. Num. Anal. 19 (1982), 245–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. K. Burrage, J. C. Butcher and F. H. Chipman,An implementation of singly-implicit Runge-Kutta methods, BIT 20 (1980), 326–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. J. C. Butcher,On the implementation of implicit Runge-Kutta methods, BIT 16 (1976), 237–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. J. C. Butcher,A transformed implicit Runge-Kutta method, J. Assoc. Comput. Mach. 26 (1979), 731–738.

    Google Scholar 

  6. J. C. Butcher,Towards efficient implementation of singly-implicit methods, ACM Trans. Math. Software 14 (1988), 68–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. J. C. Butcher,The Numerical Analysis of Ordinary Differential Equations: Runge-Kutta and General Linear Methods, John Wiley, New York, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  8. J. C. Butcher and J. R. Cash,Towards efficient Runge-Kutta methods for stiff systems, SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 27 (1990), 753–761.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. R. Caira, C. Costabile and F. Costabile,A class of pseudo-Runge-Kutta methods, BIT (1990) 30, 642–649.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. K. Dekker and J. G. Verwer,Stability of Runge-Kutta Methods for Stiff Nonlinear Differential Equations, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  11. P. W. Gaffney,A performance evaluation of some Fortran subroutines for the solution of stiff ordinary differential equations, ACM Trans. Math. Software 10 (1984), 58–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. C. W. Gear,Numerical Initial Value Problems in Ordinary Differential Equations. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Z. Jackiewicz, R. Renaut and A. Feldstein,Two-step Runge-Kutta methods, SIAM J. Numer Anal. 28 (1991), 1165–1182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Z. Jackiewicz and M. Zennaro,Variable-stepsize explicit two-step Runge-Kutta methods, Math. Comp. (in press).

  15. Z. Jackiewicz and M. Zennaro,Explicit two-step Runge-Kutta methods, submitted.

  16. A. Wolfbrandt,A study of Rosenbrock process with respect to order conditions and stiff stability, Department of Computer Science, Chalmers University of Technology, Göteborg, Sweden.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

The work of A. Bellen and M. Zennaro was supported by the CNR and MPI. The work of Z. Jackiewicz was supported by the CNR and by the NSF under grant DMS-8520900.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bellen, A., Jackiewicz, Z. & Zennaro, M. Local error estimation for singly-implicit formulas by two-step Runge-Kutta methods. BIT 32, 104–117 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01995111

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01995111

Subject classification

Navigation