Histamine receptor blocking effects of cimetidine in the airways
- 19 Downloads
We investigated the modification of histamine-induced bronchoconstriction by the H2-antagonist cimetidine in conscious sheep. One hundred breaths of 5% histamine aerosol increased mean (SD) pulmonary resistance (RL) by 5.6 (1.4) cmH2O/1/sec. This increase inRL was completely blocked by intravenous clemastine (0.5 mg), a specific H1-antagonist, indicating that the histamine-induced bronchoconstriction was mediated by H1-receptors. Intravenous cimetidine caused a dose-dependent enhancement of the histamine response between 1 and 1000 mg with a mean peak ΔRL of 15.3 (5) cmH2O/1/sec (P<0.05) at the 1000 mg dose, while it blocked the histamine response at a dose of 2400 mg [ΔRL=1.9 (2) cmH2O/1/sec,p=NS]. This paradoxic effect was not related to an anticholinergic mechanism as intravenous cimetidine (2400 mg) failed to block carbachol-induced (25 breaths of 1% solution) bronchoconstriction. We conclude that in the ovine airway, cimetidine is a selective H2-histamine receptor blocker at lower tissue concentrations, and a combined H2- and H1-histamine receptor blocker at high tissue concentrations.
KeywordsHistamine Cimetidine Receptor Blocker Tissue Concentration Blocking Effect
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- P. Eyre andN. Chand, Histamine receptor mechanisms of the lung. InPharmacology of Histamine Receptors (Ed.C.R. Ganellin andE.M. Parsons), Bristol, UK 1981 (in press).Google Scholar
- P. Eyre, Pulmonary histamine H1 and H2 receptor studies. InAsthma: Physiology, Immunopharmacology and Treatment, pp. 169–180 (Ed.L.M. Lichtenstein andK.F. Austen). Academic Press, New York 1977.Google Scholar
- A.S.F. Ash andH.O. Schild,Receptors mediating some actions of histamine, Br. J. Pharmac.27, 427–439 (1966).Google Scholar
- R.W. Brimblecome, W.A.M. Duncan, G.J. Durant, J.C. Emmet, C.R. Ganellin andE.M. Parsons,Cimetidine — A non-thiourea, H 2-receptor antagonist, J. int. med. Res.3, 86–92 (1975).Google Scholar
- J.G. Maconochie, E.P. Woodings andD.A. Richards,Effects of H 1 and H 2 receptor blocking agents in non-asthmatic subjects, Br. J. clin. Pharmac.7, 231–236 (1979).Google Scholar
- R.A. Nathan, N. Segall, G.C. Glover andA.L. Shocket,The effects of H 1 and H 2 antihistamines on histamine inhalation challenges in asthmatic patients, Am. Rev. resp. Dis.120, 1252–1258 (1979).Google Scholar
- J. Milic-Emilic, J. Mead, J.M. Turner andE.M. Glauser,Improved technique for estimating pleural pressure from esophageal balloon, J. appl. Physiol.19, 207–211 (1964).Google Scholar
- P. Eyre,The pharmacology of sheep tracheobronchial muscle. A relaxant effect of histamine on the isolated bronchi, Br. J. Pharmac.36, 409–417 (1969).Google Scholar
- P. Eyre,Histamine H 2-receptors in the sheep bronchus and cat trachea. The action of burimamide, Br. J. Pharmac.48, 321–323 (1973).Google Scholar
- M. Dixon, D.M. Jackson andJ.M. Richards,The effects of H 1 and H 2 receptor agonists on total lung resistance, dynamic compliance and irritant receptor discharge in the compliance and irritant receptor discharge in the anesthetized dogs, Br. J. Pharmac.66, 203–209 (1979).Google Scholar
- V. Hartmann, H. Magnussen, J.P. Holle andE. Schuler,Modulation of histamine induced bronchoconstriction with inhaled, oral and intravenous clemastine in normals and asthmatics, Thorax (in press).Google Scholar