Skip to main content
Log in

Evaluating the efficacy of various phosphate fertiliser sources for oil palm seedlings

  • Published:
Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Isotope dilution techniques were used in a glasshouse experiment to compare seven P sources for oil palm seedlings grown on Rengam series soil (Typic Paleudult). The P sources were triple superphosphate (TSP) and six phosphate rocks from North Carolina, USA (NCPR), Tunisia (Gafsa PR), Jordan (JPR), Morocco (MPR), Christmas Island (CIPR) and China (CPR). The percent P derived from fertilisers (%PdfF) in the 3, 6, 9 and 12 months of growth ranged from 81% to 99%, indicating the poor P supplying power of the soil used. TSP was far superior than PR in supplying the required P at all times of measurement. Total amount of P taken up during the 12 months growing period was equivalent to 15.0% of the added P as TSP, it was 5.2% from NCPR, 4.2% from JPR, 4.1% from MPR, 3.2% from GPR, 4% from CIPR and 2.2% from CPR. The PR effectiveness based on the amounts of fertilizer P taken up by the oil palm seedlings at 12 months of growth was in the sequence of triple superphosphate > North Carolina PR > Gafsa PR ≥ Jordan PR ≥ Morocco PR ≥ Christmas Island PR > China PR. This was due to the reactivity of these P sources when applied into the soil, triple superphosphate being water soluble is immediately available. PR sources reacted with the soil solution with time, making P slowly available. PR solubilised by neutral ammonium citrate (NAC) expressed as percentage of rock was shown to correlate better than 2% citric acid and 2% formic acid with plant P uptake. Thus this method of extracting P from PR can be used as a basis for comparing PR effectiveness to oil palm seedlings.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barrow NJ (1974) The slow reaction between soil and anion: 1. Effect of time, temperature and water content of a soil on the decrease in effectiveness of phosphate for plant growth. Soil Sci 118: 380–386

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolland MDA & Gilkes RJ (1987) How effective are Calciphos and Phosphal. Fert Res 12: 229–239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chien SH (1995) Chemical, mineralogical and solubility characteristics of phosphate rocks for direct application. In: Dahanayake K et al. (eds) Proc Inter Workshop on Direct Application of Phosphate Rock and Appropriate Technology Fertilisers in Asia: What Hinders Acceptance and Growth, pp 49–58 Inst Fundamental Studies, Sri Lanka and Inter Fert Devt Centre, Muscle Shoal, Alabama, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Chien SH & Menon RG (1995) Factors affecting the agronomic effectiveness of phosphate rock for direct application. Fert Res 41: 227–234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chien SH & Hammond LL (1978) A comparison of various laboratory methods for predicting the agronomic potential of phosphate rocks for direct application. Soil Sci Soc Amer J 42: 935–939

    Google Scholar 

  • Foong SF (1993) Comparative efficacy of various rock phosphates on the growth of oil palm seedlings using radio-isotope and conventional techniques. 1993 PORIM International Palm Oil Congress, Kuala Lumpur: 625–638

  • Foster HL, Tarmizi AM, Tayeb MD & Zin ZZ (1988) Oil palm yield responses to P fertiliser in Peninsular Malaysia. PORIM Bull 17: 1–8

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuad A (1976) Distribution of phosphate in six Malaysian soils. BSc Project Report. University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghosh AK & Gilkes RJ (1987) The initial and residual agronomic effectiveness of some Indian, USA and Australian PR. Fert Res 12: 201–218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goh KJ, Chew PS & Teo CB (1994) Maximising and maintaining oil palm yields on commercial scale in Malaysia. Proc Inter Planters Conf on Management for Enhanced Profitability in Plantations, 1994. Inc Soc Planters, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. pp 121–142

    Google Scholar 

  • Larsen S (1967) Soil phosphorus. Adv Agron 19: 151–120

    Google Scholar 

  • Larsen S (1952) The use of32P in studies on the uptake of phosphorus by plant. Plant and Soil 4: 1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lehr JR & McClellan GH (1972) A revised reactivity scale for evaluating PR for direct application. Bull Y-43, TVA National Fertiliser Development, Muscle Shoals, Alabama, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Ng SK (1986) Phosphorus nutrition and fertilisation of oil palm. Oleagineux 41: 307–313

    Google Scholar 

  • Owen G (1953) Determination of available nutrients in Malayan soils. J Rub Res Inst Malaya 14: 109–120

    Google Scholar 

  • Sale PWG & Mokwunye AU (1993) Use of phosphate rocks in the tropics. Fert Res 35: 33–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scheel KC (1936) Calorimetric determination of phosphoric acid in fertilisers with the Pulfrich photometer. Zeitschrift für Analytische Chemie 105: 256–269

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smyth FJ & Sanchez A (1982) PR dissolution and availability in Cerrado soils as affected by phosphorus sorption capacity. Soil Sci Soc Am J 46: 339–345

    Google Scholar 

  • Stephen RC & Condron LM (1986) An assessment of the agronomic efficiency of partially acidulated PR fertilisers. Fert Res 10: 269–282

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zapata F & Axmann H (1995)32P isotopic techniques for evaluating the agronomic effectiveness of rock phosphate materials. Fert Res 41: 189–195

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zaharah, A.R., Zulkifli, H. & Sharifuddin, H.A.H. Evaluating the efficacy of various phosphate fertiliser sources for oil palm seedlings. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst 47, 93–98 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01991540

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01991540

Key words

Navigation