Advertisement

Journal of Insect Behavior

, Volume 8, Issue 1, pp 133–137 | Cite as

Plurimatry: New terminology for multiple reproductives

  • Jae C. Choe
Short Communication

Key words

monogyny plurimatry pluripatry polygyny unimatry 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Brown, J. L. (1987).Helping and Communal Breeding in Birds, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar
  2. Buschinger, A., and Crozier, R. H. (1987). Introduction. In Eder, J., and Rembold, H. (eds.).Chemistry and Biology of Social Insects, Verlag J. Perperny, München, pp. 251–242.Google Scholar
  3. Choe, J. C. (1988). Worker reproduction and social evolution in ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). In Trager, J. C. (ed.).Advances in Myrmecology, E. J. Brill, Leiden, pp. 163–187.Google Scholar
  4. Choe, J. C., and Perlman, D. L. (1995). Social conflict and cooperation among founding queens in ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). In Choe, J. C., and Crespi, B. J. (eds.).Social Competition and Cooperation in Insects and Arachnids. II. Evolution of Sociality, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ., in press.Google Scholar
  5. Creel, S. R., and Creel, N. M. (1991). Energetics, reproductive suppression and obligate communal breeding in carnivores.Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 28 263–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Emlen, S. T., and Oring, L. W. (1977). Ecology, sexual selection and the evolution of mating systems.Science 197 215–223.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Han, S. H., and Noirot, C. (1983). Dévelopment de la jeune colonie chezCubitermes fungifaber (Sjöstedt) (Isoptera: Termitidae).Ann. Soc. Entomol. Fr. (N.S.) 19 413–420.Google Scholar
  8. Hölldobler, B. (1962). Zu Frage der Oligogynie beiCamponotus ligniperda Latr. undComponotus herculeanus L. (Hym. Formicidae).Z. Angew. Entomol. 49 337–352.Google Scholar
  9. Hölldobler, B., and Carlin, N. F. (1985). Colony founding, queen dominance and oligogyny in the Australian meat antIridomyrmex purpureus.Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 18 45–58.Google Scholar
  10. Hölldobler, B., and Wilson, E. O. (1977). The number of queens: An important trait in ant evolution.Naturwissenschaften 64 8–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hölldobler, B., and Wilson, E. O. (1990).The Ants, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  12. Itô, Y. (1993).Behaviour and Social Evolution in Wasps, Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  13. Kruuk, H. (1972).The Spotted Hyena: A Study of Predation and Social Behavior, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
  14. Laidlaw, H. H., and Page, R. E. (1984). Polyandry in honey bees (Apis mellifera L.): Sperm utilization and intracolony genetic relationships.Genetics 108 985–997.Google Scholar
  15. Nalepa, C. A., and Jones, S. C. (1991). Evolution of monogamy in termites.Biol. Rev. 66 83–97.Google Scholar
  16. Oster, G. F., and Wilson, E. O. (1978).Caste and Ecology in the Social Insects, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar
  17. Pamilo, P. (1991). Evolution of colony characteristics in social insects. II. Number of reproductive individuals.Am. Nat. 138 412–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Peeters, C., and Crozier, R. H. (1988). Caste and reproduction in ants: Not all mated egg-layers are “queens.”Psyche 95 283–288.Google Scholar
  19. Richards, O. W., and Richards, M. J. (1951). Observations on the social wasps of South America (Hymenoptera: Vespidae).Trans. Royal Entomol. Soc. Lond. 102 1–170.Google Scholar
  20. Rood, J. P. (1975). Population dynamics and food habits of the banded mongoose.E. Afr. Wildl. J. 13 89–111.Google Scholar
  21. Rood, J. P. (1986). Ecology and social evolution in the mongooses. In Rubenstein, D. I., and Wrangham, R. W. (eds.).Ecological Aspects of Social Evolution, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, pp. 131–152.Google Scholar
  22. Rosengaus, R. B., and Traniello, J. F. A. (1991). Biparental care in incipient colonies of the dampwood termiteZootermopsis angusticollis Hagen (Isoptera: Termopsidae).J. Insect Behav. 4 633–647.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Ross, K. G., and Matthews, R. W. (1991).The Social Biology of Wasps, Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar
  24. Russell, J. K. (1983). Altruism in coati bands: neoptism or reciprocity? In Wasser, S. K. (ed.).Social Behavior of Female Vertebrates, Academic Press, New York, pp. 263–290.Google Scholar
  25. Schaller, G. B. (1972).The Serengeti Lion: A Study of Predator-Prey Relations, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
  26. Shellman-Reeve, J. S. (1990). Dynamics of biparental care in the dampwood termite,Zootermopsis nevadensis (Hagen): Response to nitrogen availability.Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 26 389–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Sherman, P. W., Seeley, T. D., and Reeve, H. K. (1988). Parasites, pathogens, and polyandry in social Hymenoptera.Am. Nat. 131 602–610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Wilson, E. O. (1971).The Insect Societies, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jae C. Choe
    • 1
  1. 1.Museum of ZoologyThe University of MichiganAnn Arbor

Personalised recommendations