Differential effects of dipyrone, ibuprofen, and paracetamol on experimentally induced pain in man
In a double-blind cross-over study on 22 healthy subjects the analgesic efficacies of the antipyretic analgesic drugs ibuprofen, dipyrone and paracetamol were tested against placebo using a model of experimentally induced pain. To this purpose interdigital webs were pinched repeatedly for 2 min periods. The painfulness of these stimuli was assessed by the subjects on an electronically controlled visual analogue scale at 10 sec intervals. In addition to the subjective pain rating the stimulus induced reflex diminution of the blood flow in the stimulated hand was measured with photoplethysmography and laser Doppler flow analysis. The flare response around the stimulated area was assessed with infrared thermography. In this assay system ibuprofen and dipyrone, but not paracetamol, showed statistically significant analgesic effects by preventing hyperalgesia which is normally induced by the repeated stimulation of a skin site. This hypoalgesic effect was not related to the subjective impression of the subjects of the analgesic potency of the respective drug. Sympathetic reflex vasoconstriction was not quantitatively related to the drug induced hypoalgesia. Ibuprofen and, to a minor extent, the other antipyretic analgesic drugs also diminished the stimulus induced flare reaction around the stimulated skin sites.
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- H. K. Beecher, Measurement of subjective responses.Quantitative effects of drugs. Oxford University Press, New York (1959).Google Scholar
- R. Melzack and K. L. Casey,Sensory, motivational and central control determinants of pain. InThe skin senses (Eds. D. Kenshalo, Thomas, Springfield Ill.), pp. 423–443, 1968.Google Scholar
- H. O. Handwerker and P. W. Reeh,Pain and Inflammation. InProceedings of the VIth World Congress on Pain (Pain Research and Clinical Management, Vol. 5), (Eds. M. Bond, J. E. Charlton & C. Woolf), Elsevier, North Holland, 1991.Google Scholar
- F. Anton, H. O. Handwerker, A. Kreh, P. W. Reeh, E. Walter and E. Weber,Influence of acetylsalicylic and salicylic plasma levels on psychophysical measures of long standing natural pain stimuli. InAdvances in Pain Research and Therapy (Eds. H. L. Fields, R. Dubner & F. Cervero), Raven Press, New York, 781–789 (1985).Google Scholar
- H. O. Handwerker,Der Wirkungsnachweis von Ibuprofen und anderen nichtsteroidalen Antirheumatika in der experimentellen Algesimetrie. Ztschr. Rheumatologie,Suppl. 1, 15–18 (1991).Google Scholar
- H. O. Handwerker, A. Beck, C. Forster, Th. Gall and W. Magerl,Analgesic effects of dipyrone as compared to placebo. InNew Pharmacological and epidemiological data in analgesics research (Ed. K. Brune), Birkhäuser Verlag, Basel, Boston, Berlin 19–28 (1990).Google Scholar
- H. Adriaensen, J. Gybels, H. O. Handwerker and J. Van Hees,Nociceptor discharges and sensations during prolonged noxious mechanical stimulation—a paradox. Human Neurobiol.3, 53–58 (1984).Google Scholar
- G. Geisslinger, K. Dietzel, H. Bezler, B. Nürnberg and K. Brune,Therapeutically relevant differences in the pharmacokinetical and pharmaceutical behaviour of ibuprofen lysinate as compared to ibuprofen acid. Int. J. Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. Tox.27, 7, 324–328 (1989).Google Scholar
- S. A. Cooper,The relative efficacy of ibuprofen in dental pain. Compend. Contin. Educ. Cent.7, 578–597 (1987).Google Scholar
- H.-J. Schroth, H. Garth, St. Rupp and A. Steinsträßer,Wirkung von Metamizol auf die Harnwegs-Motilität. Fortschritte der Medizin18, 378–382 (1986).Google Scholar