Skip to main content
Log in

Complex-irreversibility and evolution

  • Reviews
  • Published:
Experientia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Both, irreversibility and evolution, imply order in time. It is argued that the only possible concept of time is a ‘system-specific time’, and that order in time is convertible into order in space and vice-versa. While life-less, complex systems are irreversible because of their complexity and, hence, not repeatable, living systems are reproduced by irreversible copy-reproduction and by coding. This mode of reproduction results of necessity in an arrow of time of growth and increasing complexity with death as its antagonist, and in obligatory spatial asymmetry. This arrow of increasing organic complexity is simultaneous with, and independent of, the arrow of increasing entropy. — A generalized, organic hierarchy is proposed as the model to study higher evolution. This hierarchy reproduces itself by differential rates of reproduction of its subnunits within and between the various hierarchical levels of organization. Phylogenetic change is brought about by a change in this hierarchy's specific phase pattern of growth. Continuous and discrete organization is defined, and it is shown that specific relations between continuous and discrete levels within the hierarchy result in accumulation of neutral alleles. This accumulation is due to complex-irreversibility and causes genetic stabilisation, i.e. heritability, of the speciesspecific morphology of organisms.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Walker, I., Biological memory. Acta biotheor.21 (1972) 203–235.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. From a discussion with G. Wuerth, Jr, Zürich. G. Wuerth works on experience of time and space in cinematography and television.

  3. Weyl, H., Symmetry, Princeton University Press, Princeton 1952.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  4. Wigner, E.P., Violation of symmetry in physics. Scient. Am.213 (1965) 28–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Walker, I., Maxwell's demon in biological systems. Acta biotheor.25 (1976) 103–110.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Eigen, M., Self-organization of matter and the evolution of macromolecules. Naturwissenschaften58 (1971) 465–523.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Eigen, M., and Schuster, P., The hypercycle. A principle of natural self-organization. Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg/New York 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Grimm, Gebrüder, Von dem Fischer und syner Fru, in: Kinder- und Hausmärchen. Manesse Verlag. Zürich (new edn).

  9. Schroedinger, E., Was ist Leben? Franke, Bern 1951.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Walker, I., The pattern of expressivity with special reference to symmetry in a scutellar bristle mutant of a East-AfricanZaprionus species. Revue suisse Zool.79 (1972) 165–178.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Portmann, A., Die Tiergestalt. Friedrich Reinhardt, Basel 1960.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Thompson d'Arcy, W., On growth and form. Cambridge University Press. Cambridge/London 1942.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Walker, I., The mechanical porperties of proteins determine the laws of evolutionary change, Acta biotheor.28 (1979) 239–282.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Kühn, A., Pohley, H.J., and Henke, K., in: Vorlesungen über Entwicklungsphysiologie. Ed. A. Kühn. Springer. Berlin/Göttingen/Heidelberg 1955.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Goodman, M., and Moore, G.W., use of Chou-Fasman amino-acid conformational parameters to analyze the organization of the genetic code and to construct protein genealogies. J. molec. Evol.10 (1977) 7–47.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Miyata, T., Myazawa, S., and Yasunaga, T., Two types of amino-acid substitutions in protein evolution. J. molec. Evol.12 (1979) 219–236.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Evans, H.J., ed., Genetic repair. Genetics79 (suppl., 1975.

  18. Walker, I., The evolution of sexual reproduction as a repair mechanism. Part 1. A model for self-repair and its biological implications. Acta biotheor.27 (1978) 133–158.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Williams, R.M., and Walker, I., The evolution of sexual reproduction as a repair mechanism. Part 2. Mathematical treatment of the wheel model and its significance for real systems. Acta biotheor.27 (1978) 159–184.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Bernstein, H., Byers, G.S., and Michod, R.E., Evolution of sexual reproduction: Importance of DNA repair, complementation and variation. Am. Nat.117 (1981) 537–549.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Walker, I., The problem of somatic plasticity in the theory of evolution. Arch. Julius Klaus-Stift. Vererb-Forsch.43 (1968) 40–51

    Google Scholar 

  22. Walker, I., and Williams, R.M., The evolution of the cooperative group. Acta biotheor.25 (1976) 1–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Acknowledgment. I thank Dr P. Henderson for much stimulating discussion and for critically reading the manuscript.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Walker, I. Complex-irreversibility and evolution. Experientia 39, 806–813 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01990396

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01990396

Keywords

Navigation