Abstract
We analyse a greedy heuristic for finding small dominating sets in graphs: bounds on the size of the dominating set so produced had previously been derived in terms of the size of a smallest dominating set and the number of vertices and edges in the graph, respectively, We show that computing the resulting small dominating set isP-hard and so cannot be done efficiently in parallel (in the context of the PRAM model of parallel computation). We also consider a related non-deterministic greedy heuristic.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
R. Anderson and E. Mayr,Parallelism and the maximal path problem, Inform. Process. Lett., Vol. 82, No. 2 (1987), 121–126.
V. Chvatal,A greedy heuristic for the set covering problem, Math. Oper. Res., Vol. 4 (1979), 233–235.
S. A. Cook,A taxonomy of problems with fast parallel algorithms, Inform. Control, Vol. 64, Nos. 1–3 (1985), 2–22.
R. Greenlaw,Ordered vertex removal and subgraph problems, J. Comput. System Sci., No. 3, Vol. 39 (1989), 323–342.
R. Greenlaw, H. J. Hoover and W. L. Ruzzo,A compendium of problems complete for P Part II: P-complete problems, Dept. Computer Science Tech. Rep., Univ. Alberta, to appear.
D. S. Hochbaum,Approximation algorithms for the set covering and vertex covering problems, SIAM J. Comput., Vol. 11 (1982), 555–556.
D. S. Johnson,Approximate algorithms for combinatorial problems, J. Comput. System Sci., Vol. 9 (1974), 256–278.
R. M. Karp and V. Ramachandran,Parallel algorithms for shared-memory machines, in:Handbook of Theoretical Computer Science (Ed. J. van Leeuwen), Elsevier Science Publishers B.V. (1990), 869–941.
A. K. Parekh,Analysis of a greedy heuristic for finding small dominating sets in graphs, Inform. Process. Lett., Vol. 39 (1991), 237–240.
J. Reif,Depth-first search is inherently sequential, Inform. Process. Lett., Vol. 20, No. 5 (1985), 229–234.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Stewart, I.A. On parallelizing a greedy heuristic for finding small dominant sets. BIT 33, 57–62 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01990343
Received:
Revised:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01990343