Breast Cancer Research and Treatment

, Volume 18, Issue 3, pp 179–187 | Cite as

Duct endoscopy and endoscopic biopsy in the evaluation of nipple discharge

  • Masujiro Makita
  • Goi Sakamoto
  • Futoshi Akiyama
  • Kiyoshi Namba
  • Haruo Sugano
  • Fujio Kasumi
  • Mitsumasa Nishi
  • Motoko Ikenaga

Summary

Microdochectomy is usually performed on patients with nipple discharge caused by intraductal proliferative lesions, such as intraductal papilloma and carcinoma. But this operation often sacrifices large amounts of normal mammary gland even when the lesion is a benign intraductal papilloma a few millimeters in diameter. We have developed duct endoscopy for the mammary duct system, and have reliably performed biopsies for intraductal proliferative lesions intraductally. From June 1989 to April 1990, we examined 22 cases by duct endoscopy, and performed endoscopic biopsy in 16 cases. The method of endoscopic biopsy is as follows. First, a bougie is inserted, without anesthesia other than Xylocaine jelly, into the orifice of the duct to enlarge it. Second, the outer cylinder and the inner needle are inserted; then the inner needle is removed, and the endoscope is inserted. After examination, the outer cylinder is moved up to the lesion to be biopsied and the endoscope is taken out. Then a sample is taken into the outer cylinder by aspiration. We diagnosed 10 cases of benign lesion and 5 cases of malignant lesion by cytological and/or histological examination. In conclusion, endoscopic biopsy, aided by duct endoscopy, is a useful and harmless diagnostic procedure in the evaluation of nipple discharge.

Key words

breast cancer duct endoscopy galactography intraductal biopsy of the breast nipple discharge 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Urban JA: Excision of the major duct system. Cancer 16: 516–520, 1963Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Atkins H, Wolff B: Discharges from the nipple. Brit J Surg 51: 602–606, 1964Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Namba K, Sakomoto G, Akiyama F, Makita M, Sugano H, Yoshimoto M, Watanabe S, Kasumi F, Nishi M: Intraductal biopsy of the breast (IDBB) for intraductal lesions — a case of breast cancer diagnosed by IDBB. Jpn J Breast Cancer 4: 253–258, 1989Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Makita M, Sakamoto G, Namba K, Akiyama F, Iwase T, Sugano H, Yoshimoto M, Watanabe S, Kasumi F, Nishi M: Nyukannaishikyo (in Japanese). Jpn J Breast Cancer 4: 571–575, 1989Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Leborgne RA: The Breast in Roentgen Diagnosis. Constable & Co, London, 1953, pp 14–19Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hicken NF, Best RR, Hunt HB, Harris TT: The roentgen visualization and diagnosis of breast lesions by means of contrast media. Am J Roentgenol Rad Therapy 39: 321–343, 1938Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gregl A: Color atlas of galactography. F.K. Schattauer Verlag, Stuttgart-New York, 1980, pp 43–53, pp 139–199Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ciatto S, Bravetti P, Berni D, Catarzi S, Bianchi S: The role of galactography in the detection of breast cancer. Tumori 74: 177–181, 1988Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ishii Y, Fujii M, Wakabayashi T, Chyodo K, Sakuma I, Tomono T, Hagiwara K, Nagao M, Kato K: Cytology of nipple discharge with a cell concentration method — comparative study with a direct smear method. J Jpn Soc Clin Cytol 28: 389–393, 1989Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Namba K, Sakamoto G, Akiyama F, Sugano H, Yoshimoto M, Watanabe S, Kasumi F, Nishi M: Diagnostic value of CEA measurement of nipple discharge in breast carcinoma — utilization of ‘film method’. Jpn J Breast Cancer 3: 295–304, 1988Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Okazaki A, Watanabe Y, Okazaki M, Sato H, Mikami T, Toda K, Okazaki Y, Nabeta K, Asaishi H, Hayasaka H, Narimatsu E: Diagnosis of nonpalpable breast cancer by ductography — Histological study compared with ductographic findings. Jpn J Breast Cancer 4: 587–594, 1989Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Teboul M: A new concept in breast investigation: echohistological acino-ductal analysis or analytic echography. Biomed Pharmacother 42: 289–296, 1988Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Teboul M: Echo-histological ‘acino-ductal analysis’, Preliminary results. Ultrasound in Med. & Biol. 14: 89–95, 1988Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Gallager HS, Martin JE: Early phases in the development of breast cancer. Cancer 24: 1170–1178, 1969Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Wellings SR, Jensen HM, Marcum RG: An atlas of subgross pathology of the human breast with special reference to possible precancerous lesions. JNCI 55: 231–273, 1975Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kraus FT, Neubecker RD: The differential diagnosis of papillary tumors of the breast. Cancer 15: 444–455, 1962Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • Masujiro Makita
    • 4
    • 3
  • Goi Sakamoto
    • 4
  • Futoshi Akiyama
    • 4
  • Kiyoshi Namba
    • 4
  • Haruo Sugano
    • 4
  • Fujio Kasumi
    • 1
  • Mitsumasa Nishi
    • 1
  • Motoko Ikenaga
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of SurgeryCancer Institute HospitalJapan
  2. 2.Department of Diagnostic CytologyCancer Institute HospitalJapan
  3. 3.Department of SurgeryTokyo Women's Medical College Daini HospitalJapan
  4. 4.Department of PathologyCancer InstituteTokyoJapan

Personalised recommendations