Skip to main content
Log in

Efficacy of single-dose azithromycin versus doxycycline in the treatment of cervical infections caused byChlamydia trachomatis

  • Article
  • Published:
European Journal of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The efficacy of single-dose azithromycin therapy in the treatment of cervicalChlamydia trachomatis infections was compared to that of a standard seven-day course of treatment with doxycycline. Cervical samples from 60 patients reacted positively in an enzyme immunoassay for detection ofChlamydia trachomatis. In 31 patientsChlamydia trachomatis was isolated from the sample taken before treatment. Fourteen of the 31 patients were treated with doxycycline and 17 with azithromycin. All cultures of samples taken one and four weeks after the start of therapy were negative. All 31 isolates showed a similar pattern of MICs for the seven antibiotics tested, including azithromycin and doxycycline. No differences were observed between isolates of different serovars. In samples from four patients chlamydial DNA could be detected by PCR one week after the start of the therapy and in two patients also after four weeks. No difference in microbiological parameters could be observed between the two treatment groups. It is concluded that single-dose azithromycin is as effective as a seven-day course of doxycycline in the therapy of cervicalChlamydia trachomatis infections.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Foulds G, Shepard RM, Johnson RB The pharmacokinetics of azithromycin in human serum and tissues. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy 1990, 25, Supplement A: 73–82.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Barnes RC, Wang SP, Kuo CC, Stamm WE Rapid immunotyping ofChlamydia trachomatis with monoclonal antibodies in a solid phase enzyme immunoassay. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 1985, 22: 609–613.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Sriprakash KS, Macavoy ES Characterization and sequence of a plasmid from the trachoma biovar ofChlamydia trachomatis. Plasmid 1987, 18: 205–214.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Taylor-Robinson D, Thomas BJ Laboratory techniques for the diagnosis of chlamydial infections. Genitourinary Medicine 1991, 67: 256–266.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Ehret JM, Judson FN Susceptibility testing ofChlamydia trachomatis: from eggs to monoclonal antibodies. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 1988, 32: 1295–1299.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Johnson FWA, Hobson D Factors affecting the sensitivity of replicating McCoy cells in the isolation and growth of Chlamydia A (TRIC agents). Journal of Hygiene 1976, 76: 441–451.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Karayiannis P, Hobson D, Lee N Effect of cycloheximide on the infective yield of a genital strain ofChlamydia trachomatis in McCoy cells. Infection and Immunity 1981, 33: 309–311.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Endtz HPH, Ossewaarde JM, van der Korput PJGM, Weiland HT In vitro activity of eight quinolones againstChlamydia trachomatis. Reviews of Infectious Diseases 1989, 11, Supplement 5: 1278.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ronald AR, Peeling RW Chlamydial infections and the quinolones. European Journal of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases 1991, 10: 351–354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Scieux C, Bianchi A, Chappey B, Vassias I, Perol Y In vitro activity of azithromycin againstChlamydia trachomatis. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy 1990, 25, Supplement A: 7–10.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Claas HCJ, Wagenvoort JHT, Niesters HGM, Tio TT, van Rijsoort-Vos JH, Quint WGV Diagnostic value of the polymerase chain reaction for chlamydia detection as determined in a follow-up study. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 1991, 29: 42–45.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Radcliffe KW, Rowen D, Mercey DE, Mumtaz G, Ridgway GL, Robinson AJ, Bingham JS Is a test of cure necessary following treatment for cervical infection withChlamydia trachomatis. Genitourinary Medicine 1990, 66: 444–446.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Jones RB, van der Pol B, Martin DH, Shepard MK Partial characterization ofChlamydia trachomatis isolates resistant to multiple antibiotics. Journal of Infectious Diseases 1990, 162: 1309–1315.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Wagenvoort JHT, Suchland RJ, Stamm WE Serovar distribution of urogenitalChlamydia trachomatis strains in the Netherlands. Genitourinary Medicine 1988, 64: 159–161.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ossewaarde, J.M., Plantema, F.H.F., Rieffe, M. et al. Efficacy of single-dose azithromycin versus doxycycline in the treatment of cervical infections caused byChlamydia trachomatis . Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 11, 693–697 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01989972

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01989972

Keywords

Navigation