Skip to main content
Log in

Die Resistenz der Stubenfliege (Musca domestica L.) gegenüber phosphorsäureestern (PSE) in Süddeutschland

Resistance of House Flies (Musca domestica L.) to organophosphorous insecticides in South Germany

  • Published:
Anzeiger für Schädlingskunde, Pflanzenschutz, Umweltschutz Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

8 wild strains ofMusca domestica L. caught in stables have been tested for resistance to malathion, azinphosethyl, bromophos, bromophos-ethyl, trichlorphon, dichlorvos, dimethoate and parathion. All strains have been less susceptible than the control strain. The resistance ratio amounted to 20 at dimethoate and dichlorvos; at azinphosethyl, bromophos, bromophos-ethyl and parathion the resistance ratio of some strains exceeded 20; at malathion and trichlorphon all values surpassed 20.

Zusammenfassung

8 in Stallungen gefangene Stubenfliegenstämme wurden auf Resistenz gegenüber Malathion, Azinphos-Äthyl, Bromophos, Bromophos-Äthyl, Dichlorvos, Dimethoat, Trichlorphon und Parathion untersucht. Die Dosis-Wirkungs-Kurven sind abgebildet; alle Stämme waren gegenüber den PSE weniger empfindlich als der verwendete Kontrollstamm. Die Resistenzquotienten bei Dimethoat und Dichlorvos lagen ausnahmslos unter 20, bei Azinphos-Äthyl, Bromophos, Bromophos-Äthyl und Parathion teilweise über, teilweise unter 20; bei Malathion und Trichlorphon lagen die Werte bei allen Stämmen über 20.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literaturverzeichnis

  1. Bigley, W. S., Plapp, F. W., 1960: Cholinesterase and aliesterase activity in organophosphorous- susceptible and-resistant house flies. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Amec.53, 360.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Devonshire, A. L., 1975: Studies of acetylcholinesterase from houseflies (Musca domestica L.) resistant and susceptible to organophosphorous insecticides. Biochem. J.149, 463.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Feakins, P. B., Tipton, J. D., 1971: Note on OP resistant houseflies in farm buildings in Finland. Pestic. Sc..2, 190.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Gerolt, P., 1974: Mechanismen of resistance of dichlorvos in adult houseflies. Pest. Biochem. Physiol.4, 275.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Keiding, J., 1975: Problems of housefly (Muscadomestica) control due to multiresistance to insecticides. J. Hyg. Epidemiol. Microbiol. Immun.19, (3), 340.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Keiding, J., Jasutomi, K., 1969: Some combinations of resistance to organophosphorous compounds in Danish fly strains. Annual Report, Pest Inf. Lab., 44.

  7. Künast, C., Messner, M., 1979: Untersuchungen zum gegenwärtigen Stand der Insektizidresistenz bei der Stubenfliege (Musca domestica L.) in Süddeutschland. Anz. Schädlingskde., Pflanzensch., Umweltsch.,52, 163.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Openoorth, F. J., 1959: Genetics of resistance to organophosphorous compounds and low ali-esterase activity in the housefly. Entomol. Exp. Appl.2, 304.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Plapp, F. W., Tripathi, R. K., 1978: Biochemical genetics of altered acetylcholinesterase resistance to insecticides in the house fly. Biochem. Gen.16 (1/2), 1.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Sawicki, R. M., 1973: Recent advances in the study of the genetics of resistance in the housefly,Musca domestica. Pestic. Sci.4, 501.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Tripathi, R. K., 1976: Relation of acetylcholinesterase sensitivity to cross-resistance of a resistant housefly strain to organophosphates and carbamates. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol.6, 30.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Mit 8 Abbildungen und einer Tabelle

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Künast, C. Die Resistenz der Stubenfliege (Musca domestica L.) gegenüber phosphorsäureestern (PSE) in Süddeutschland. Anz. Schadlingskde., Pflanzenschutz, Umweltschutz 53, 21–24 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01988715

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01988715

Navigation