Advertisement

Archiv für Dermatologie und Syphilis

, Volume 74, Issue 2–3, pp 231–264 | Cite as

Zur Wirkung und Verwendung der Nebennierenpräparate, insbesondere in der Dermatologie

  • Julius Baum
Original-Abhandlungen
  • 19 Downloads

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  1. Abderhalden Emil u. Bergell Peter. Münchener Medizinische Wochenschrift. 1904. Nr. 23.Google Scholar
  2. J. J. Abel, Johns Hopkins Hosp. Bull. XII. 120. p. 80. Ref. Zentr. f. Phys. Bd. 1901. p. 286.Google Scholar
  3. Adam, Jones. Brit. Med. Journ. 18. I. 1902.Google Scholar
  4. Aldrich, T. B. Amer. Journ. of Physiol. V. 7. p. 457.Google Scholar
  5. Amberg, Samuel. Archiv intern. de Pharmakodyn. et de Thérapie. 11. 59. Ref. 504. Broit Zentralbl. p. 244.Google Scholar
  6. Aronheim Münch. Med. Woch. 1904. p. 615.Google Scholar
  7. Aronsohn. Deutsche Med. Woch. 1903. Nr. 3. p. 59.Google Scholar
  8. Baccarani, U. Gazzi deg. i Osped. 15. III. 1903.Google Scholar
  9. Baćza, Berl. Klin. Woch. 1902. Nr. 52.Google Scholar
  10. Barba, S. La Riforma medica. 1902. Nr. 19. Ref. Deutsche Med. Woch. 1902. Nr. 46.Google Scholar
  11. Bardier, E. Journ. de Phys. I. 5. p. 950.Google Scholar
  12. Barr, James. British Med. Journ. 19. III. 1904.Google Scholar
  13. Bartrine. Annales des mal. des org. gen. min. 1902. Nr. 11.Google Scholar
  14. Battelli. Soc. Biol. 54. 1247 (15. XI.). Ref. 232. Biochem. Zentralbl. Nr. 3. p. 119.Google Scholar
  15. Benedict, A. L. (Buffalo). Therap. Gazette. 1901. 110. 10. Ref. Therap. Monatsh. März 1902.Google Scholar
  16. de Beurmann, M. Annales de Dermat. 1902. p. 743.Google Scholar
  17. Boruttau. Pflugeis Arch. Bd. LXXVIII. p. 97.Google Scholar
  18. Botey, Ricardo. Arch. latinos de Rinol. Larnig. Otol. 1902. Ref. Annales des mal. de l'oreille, du larynx etc. März 1903.Google Scholar
  19. Braun. Langenbecks Arch. LXIX. Bd. 1. u. 2. Heft. 1903.Google Scholar
  20. Braun. Berl. Klinik. 1904.Google Scholar
  21. Brewer. Harvard Medical association. 28. III. 1903. Ref. Med. News. 20. VI. 1903.Google Scholar
  22. Brodie. Intern. Physiol.-Kongr. zu Turin. 1901. Ref. Zentr. f. Physiol. 1901. p. 492.Google Scholar
  23. Bukofzer, M. Allg. Med. Zentralz. Nr. 44 31. (V.) 1902.Google Scholar
  24. Bullowa u. Kaplan. Ref. Berl. klin. ther. Wchschr. Lck. Beil. 1904. p. 1.Google Scholar
  25. Carnot et Fosseraud. Soc. Biol. 55. 51. 9. I. 1903. Ref. Biochem. Zentralbl. p. 244.Google Scholar
  26. Chassaignac. New-York Med. Journ. 75. p. 280. 15. II. 1902.Google Scholar
  27. Cohn, J. Monatsh. f. Harnkrankh. u. sexuelle Hygiene. 1904. pag. 60.Google Scholar
  28. Cosma, Spitalul. 1904. Nr. 4. Ref. Münchener Med. Woch. 1904. 3. 848.Google Scholar
  29. Cramer. Deutsche Med. Woch. 1903. p. 609.Google Scholar
  30. Deckers et Meessen, M. Archives medicales belges. Ref. Médecine moderne. 7. I. 1903.Google Scholar
  31. Debrand. Tribune médicale. 23. VII. 1902. Ref. Gazz. degli ospedali. 26. V. 1903.Google Scholar
  32. Devilliers. Sed. med. Nr. 30. 1903. Ref. Gazzetta degli osped. 1903. Nr. 99.Google Scholar
  33. Dickson. Allg. Med. Zentralztg. 1903, Nr. 10. p. 208.Google Scholar
  34. Dömtz, Alfred. Münch. Med. Woch. 1903. p. 1452Google Scholar
  35. Dollard. Thèse de Toulouse. Ref. Gazz. degli orpedali. 7. V. 1903.Google Scholar
  36. Dreuw. Münch. Med. Woch. 1904. p. 920.Google Scholar
  37. Duncanson. Gray. Brit. Med. Journ. 1903. 21. Feber.Google Scholar
  38. Engmann, Martin, F. u. Loth, Wm. P. Medical News. 30. Mai 1903. p. 1023.Google Scholar
  39. Exner, A. Wien. Arch. f. exp. Pathol. u. Pharmakol. L. Bd.Google Scholar
  40. Fenomenoff, N. Therapia. Bd. I. 1904. Nr. 1. p. 33. Ref. Münch. Med. Woch. 1904. p. 1121.Google Scholar
  41. Fiesinger, C. Journ. des Prat. April 25. 1903. Ref. Medical News. 25. VII. 1903.Google Scholar
  42. Fox, P. Arch. ital. de Biol. 35. 2. p. 250. Ref. Zentr. f. Phys. 1901. p. 368.Google Scholar
  43. von Frisc, A. Wien. Klin. Wochenschr. 1902. Nr. 31.Google Scholar
  44. v. Fürth, Otto.Google Scholar
  45. I. Mitteilung. Hoppe-Segler. Zeitschr. f. phys. Chem. Bd. XXIV. p. 142.—b) II. Mitteilung. Hoppe-Segler. Zeitschr. f. phys. Chemie. Bd. XXVI. p. 15.—c) III. Mitteilung. Hoppe-Segler. Zeitschr. f. phys. Chemie. Bd. XXIX. p. 105.—d) Hofmeisters Beiträge zur chem. Physiol. u. Path. I. 5. 6. p. 243.—e) Deutsche Med. Woch. 23. Okt. 1902.Google Scholar
  46. Gans, S., Leon. Philad. med. Journ. 13. XII. 1902.Google Scholar
  47. Gerhardt, C. Arch. f. exp. Path. 44. 3/4. p. 161.Google Scholar
  48. Goldschmidt, Siegfried. Inaug.-Dissert. Halle. 1904.Google Scholar
  49. Goldschmidt, Sigmund. Deutsche Med. Woch. 1902. Nr. 41.Google Scholar
  50. Graeser. Münch. Med. Woch. 1903. p. 1294.Google Scholar
  51. Guerdier. Gazz. degli osped. 25. Aug. 1903. p. 1078. Ref. Med. moderne. Nr. 12. 1903.Google Scholar
  52. Heidingsfeld, M. L. Columbus medical. Journ. Mai 1903.Google Scholar
  53. Henon. Southern Praetitioner. Juli 1902. Ref. The therap. Gazette. 15. Dez. 1902.Google Scholar
  54. Herter und Wakemann. Virchows Arch. Bd. CLXIX. (1902.)Google Scholar
  55. Jamieson, Allan. Brit. med. Journ. 1902. 21. Juni.Google Scholar
  56. Josné. Soc. Biolog. 54. 30. (9. I. 1903.) Ref. 503. Biochem. Zentralbl. I. p. 244.Google Scholar
  57. Kirchner, Hans. Ophtalmolog. Klinik. 1902. Nr. 12.Google Scholar
  58. Köhn, A. Therap. d. Gegenwart. August 1902.Google Scholar
  59. Kyle, Braden. (Philadelphia). Therap. Gazette. 1902. 15. Juli. Ref. Therap. Monatsh. Nov. 1902.Google Scholar
  60. Lange, O. Münch. Med. Woch. 1903. Nr. 2.Google Scholar
  61. Langley, J. N. Journ. of Physiol. 27., 3. p. 237. Ref. Zentr. f. Phys. 1901. p. 519.Google Scholar
  62. Langlois. Arch. de Phys. X. 1. p. 124. Ref. Zentr. f. Phys. 1898. p. 199.Google Scholar
  63. Lehmann. Münch. Med. Woch. 1902. Nr. 49.Google Scholar
  64. Lewandowski, M. Zentralbl. f. Physiol. 1900. Heft 4.Google Scholar
  65. Livon. Soc. Biol. 55. 271. (27. II.) Ref. 712. Biochem. Zentralbl. I. p. 333.Google Scholar
  66. Longworth, Stephen, G. Brit. Med. Journ. 1902. 19. Juli. Ref. Therap. Monatsh. Nov. 1902.Google Scholar
  67. Lopez, E. Rev. Méd. Cubana. I. Nov. 1902. Ref. Med. News. 20. Dez. 1902.Google Scholar
  68. Lucibelli, G. Gazz. degli osped. 1901. 29. Sept. Ref. Arch. f. Derm. Bd. LXIII. p. 139.Google Scholar
  69. Lunin. Deutsch. ärztl. Verein zu St. Petersburg. Sitzung 21. Okt. 1902. St. Petersb. Med. Wochschr. 1903. Nr. 10.Google Scholar
  70. Mahn. Presse médicale. 1903. Nr. 27. Ref. Gazz. degli ospedal. 1903. 14 V.Google Scholar
  71. Martin, Edward (Philadelphia). Ref. Medical. News. 30. V. 1903. p. 1049.Google Scholar
  72. Mayer, Emil. N.-Y. Medical Record. 28. VI. 1902. Ref. Intern. Zentralbl. f. Laryng. Rhin. April 1903.Google Scholar
  73. Meltzer S. F. u. Clara. Amer. Journ. of Phys. Vol. IX. Nr. 5. Ref. Biochem. Zentralbl. Bd. I. p. 809.Google Scholar
  74. Milligan, William. Brit. med. Journ. 1. II. 1902. Ref. Arch. f. Derm. Bd. LXV. p. 286.Google Scholar
  75. Mills. Brit. Med. Journ. 28. März 1903. Ref. The therapeutic Gazette. 15 Aug. 1903.Google Scholar
  76. Moore, B. u. Purinton, C. O. Pflujers Arch. 81. p. 483.Google Scholar
  77. Moresco, Giuseppe. Gazzetta degli osped. 16. VIII. 1903. p. 1035.Google Scholar
  78. Müller, B. (Hamburg), Wien. Klin. ther. Woch. Nr. 21. 1904. Ref. M. M. W. 1904. p. 1067.Google Scholar
  79. Munro, W. Australian medical Gazette. 20. XII. 1900. p. 496. Ref. Annales de Dermat. 1902. p. 797.Google Scholar
  80. Myrtle. Brit. Med. Journ. Nr. 2261. Ref. Deutsche Med. Woch. 1904. p. 788.Google Scholar
  81. Namsky. Genfer Dissertation. 1902.Google Scholar
  82. Neugebauer. Zeitschr. f. Chir. 1902. Nr. 51.Google Scholar
  83. Nieden, Niederrhein. Ges. f. Nat. u. Heilk. in Bonn. 27. X. 1902. Deutsche med. Wochenschr. Vereinsbeil. p. 345.Google Scholar
  84. Ott, Isaac. The therap. Gazette. 15. Juni 1903.Google Scholar
  85. Park, Robert, Glasgow. Scott. Journ. Nr. 50. 1902. Ref. Monatsh. f. prakt. Dermat. Bd. XXXVI. Nr. 6.Google Scholar
  86. Pellegrini, Neapel. Kongreß f. innere Medizin, Padua. 29. X. bis 1./XI. 1903. Ref. Münch. med. Woch. 1904. p. 590.Google Scholar
  87. Piffard, Henry G. Medical Record. 7. III. 1903. Ref. Brit. Journal of Dermat. 1903. p. 304.Google Scholar
  88. von Pöhl. Verein f. innere Medizin in Berlin. 24. Nov. 1902. Ref. Münch. Med. Woch. 1902. Nr. 49.Google Scholar
  89. Rénon u. Louste. Société médicale des hôpitaux de Paris. 14. u. 21. Nov. 1902.Google Scholar
  90. Rosenberg, Albert. Vortrag in der laryngol. Gesellsch. in Berlin. 10. I. 1902.Google Scholar
  91. Rosenberg, Derselbe. Berliner klin. Wochenschr. 1903. Nr. 41.Google Scholar
  92. Bundle. British. Med. Journ. 1902. p. 1340.Google Scholar
  93. Rzentkowski. Berl. klin. Wochenschr. 1904. p. 830.Google Scholar
  94. Salvioli, J. Arch. ital. de biol. 27. 383 (1902). Ref. 711. Biochem. Zentralbl. I. 333.Google Scholar
  95. Salvioli e Pezzolini. Arch. ital. de biologie. 1902. 3. 380. Ref. 505 Biochem. Zentralbl. p. 244.Google Scholar
  96. Šamberger, Fr. W. kl. Rundschau. 1902. Nr. 29.Google Scholar
  97. Schnaudigel. Ophthalmol. Klinik. 1903. Nr. 13.Google Scholar
  98. Schubiger-Hartmann. Korresp. f. Schweizer Ärzte. 1902. Nr. 21.Google Scholar
  99. de Schweinitz, G. Therap. Gazette. 1902. 15. Juli. Ref. Therap. Monatsh. 1902. Nov.Google Scholar
  100. Simon, Otto. Münch. Med. Wochenschr. 1904. p. 1287.Google Scholar
  101. Simonovich. Russki Wratsch. 1903. Nr. 24. Ref. Medical. News. 1903. p. 268.Google Scholar
  102. Singer, Heinrich. Therap. Monatsh. Jänner 1902.Google Scholar
  103. Souquès u. Morel. Société médicale des hôpitaux de Paris. 14. u. 21. Nov. 1902.Google Scholar
  104. Stiel. Allg. ärztl. Verein zu Köln. 16. III. 1903. Ref. Münch. Med. Woch. 1903. p. 1483.Google Scholar
  105. Taramasio. Revue médicale de la Suisse romande. 1902. Nr. 8. Ref. Therap. Monatsh. Dez. 1902.Google Scholar
  106. Tarchanow. Russki Wratsch. 1902. Nr. 47. Ref. 793. Biochem. Zentralbl. I. p. 369.Google Scholar
  107. Thelwall, Thomas (Liverpol). Brit. med. Journal. 23. Nov. 1901.Google Scholar
  108. Thies u. Neugebauer. Zentralbl. f. Chir. 1903. Nr. 51.Google Scholar
  109. Umber, F. Therap. d. Gegenwart. Aug. 1902.Google Scholar
  110. Vassale e Zanfrognini. Gazz. med. ital. 1902. Nr. 44.Google Scholar
  111. Velich, Alois. Wieuer med. Blätter. 1897. p. 735.Google Scholar
  112. Voigt, Bruno. Münch. med. Woch. 1904. p. 662.Google Scholar
  113. Vosbourgh u. Richards. Amer. Journal of Physiol Vol. IX. Nr. 1. März 2. 1903. Ref. 957 Biochem. Zentralbl. I. Nr. 11. 1903.Google Scholar
  114. Walker, Norman. Scottish Med. and Surg. Journ. Juni 1903. Ref. Brit. Med. Journ. 27. VI. 1903. Lit. p. 103.Google Scholar
  115. Weil. Sitzg. d. Gesellsch. f. Laryngol. in Wien. 9. IV. 1902.Google Scholar
  116. Wessely. 28. Ophthalmol. Vers. Heidelberg. Ref. Zentralblatt f. Phys. 1901. p. 23.Google Scholar
  117. Wilcox. Harvard Med. Soc. 28. III. 1903. Ref. Med. News 20. VI. 1903.Google Scholar
  118. Zanoni. Giuseppe. Gazz. degli ospedali. 9. VII. 1903. Nr. 82.Google Scholar
  119. Zeigan. Therap. Monatsh. 1904. p. 193.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Wilhelm Braumüller 1905

Authors and Affiliations

  • Julius Baum
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.dermatologischen Universitätsklinik in BreslauBreslauPolen
  2. 2.Berlin

Personalised recommendations