Skip to main content
Log in

Bioactive compounds in the aquatic environment: Uptake and loss of DDT and dieldrin by freshwater mussels

  • Published:
Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Freshwater mussels were exposed to several concentrations of DDT [1, 1, 1-trichloro-2, 2-bis-(p-chlorophenyl) ethane] and HEOD (1, 2, 3, 4, 10, 10-hexachloro-6, 7-epoxy-1, 4, 4a, 5, 6, 7, 8a-octahydro-1, 4-endo-exo-5, 8-dimethanonaphthalene principal component of dieldrin) in natural lake water and in reconstituted distilled water, under continuous flow and constant temperature conditions. The mussels concentrate DDT approximately 2400 fold and HEOD 1200 fold in lake water; they concentrated DDT about 1000 fold in distilled water. The concentration of the insecticide chemicals in the mussels reaches equilibrium with the level in the water faster in lake water than in distilled water and the insecticide chemicals have a shorter half-life in the mussels than in lake water. The half-life of HEOD is 4.7 days in lake water compared to 13.6 days for total DDT residues in lake water. The insecticide chemical residue concentrations are highest in the digestive and reproductive tissue, and lowest in the muscle, mantle, and gill tissues. The residue concentrations are very low in the marsupia (abominal pouch), in the tests made in distilled water, but they are almost as great as those in the digestive-and reproductive tissue, in lake water.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bedford, J. W., E. W. Roelofs, and M. J. Zabik: The freshwater mussel as a biological monitor of pesticide concentrations in a lotic environment. Limnol. Oceanog.13, 118 (1968).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bugg, J. C., J. E. Higgins, and E. A. Robertson, Jr.: Chlorinated pesticide levels in the eastern oyster (Crassostrea virginica) from selected areas of the South Atlantic and Gulf of Mexico. Pesticides Monit. J.1, 9 (1967).

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler, P. A. The problem of pesticides in estuaries. Spec. Publ. No. 3 Amer. Fish. Soc., pp. 154 (1966).

  • Casper, V. L.: Galveston Bay pesticide study — water and oyster samples analyzed for pesticide residues following mosquito control program. Pesticide Monit. J.1(3), 13 (1967).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fetterolf, C. M., Jr. and R. B. Willson: Dieldrin and chlordane runoff to Lake Michigan following treatment for Japanese beetle control, Berrien County, Michigan. Proc. 13th Conf. Great Lakes Res.,University of Michigan, Great Lakes Res. Div. (1970).

  • Gakstatter, J. H. and C. M. Weiss: The elimination of14C-DDT,14C-dieldrin, and14C-lindane from fish following a single sublethal exposure in aquaria. Trans. Amer. Fish. Soc.96(3), 301 (1967).

    Google Scholar 

  • Godsil, P. J. and W. C. Johnson: Pesticide monitoring of the aquatic biota at Tule Lake National Wildlife Refuge. Pesticides Monit. J.1(4), 21 (1968).

    Google Scholar 

  • Grzenda, A. R., D. F. Paris, and W. J. Taylor: The uptake, metabolism, and elimination of chlorinated residues by goldfish (Carassius auratus) fed a14C-DDT contaminated diet. Trans. Amer. Fish. Soc.99(2), 385 (1970).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, C. W., B. M. Zuckerman, and A. J. Charig: Water translocation of diazinon-C14 and parathion-S35 off a model cranberry bog and subsequent occurrence in fish and mussels. Trans. Amer. Fish. Soc.95, 345 (1966).

    Google Scholar 

  • Robeck, G. G., K. A. Dostal, J. M. Cohen, and J. F. Kreissel: Effectiveness of water treatment processes in pesticide removal. J. Amer. Water Works Assn.57, 181 (1965).

    Google Scholar 

  • Shell Development Co., Modesto, Calif.: Determination of Chlorinated pesticide residues in water, soil, crops, and animal products. Shell Modesto Method Series (1964).

  • Stickel, L. F.: Crganochlorine pesticides in the environment. Special Scientific Report — Wildlife No. 119,U. S. Department of the Interior Washington, D.C. (1968) 32 pp. (1968).

    Google Scholar 

  • U. S. Department of the Interior, Washington, D. C.: The effects of pesticides on fish and wildlife. Fish Wildlife Service Circ. No. 226. (1965).

  • Wilbur, K. M. and C. M. Yonge. Physiology of Mollusca. Volume 2. New York: Academic Press (1966).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bedford, J.W., Zabik, M.J. Bioactive compounds in the aquatic environment: Uptake and loss of DDT and dieldrin by freshwater mussels. Arch. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 1, 97–111 (1973). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01986000

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01986000

Keywords

Navigation