Skip to main content
Log in

The origination of chromatin deficiencies as minute deletions subject to insertion elsewhere

  • Published:
Genetica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Literature Cited

  • Bridges, C. G., 1917. “Deficiency”. Genetics 2: 445–465.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kossikov, R. V. andH. J. Muller, 1935. “Invalidation of the genetic evidence for branched chromonemas in the case of Pale translocation”. J. Hered. (in press).

  • Mackensen, O., 1933. “A cytological study of short deficiencies in the X chromosome ofDrosophila melanogaster”. Rec. Gen. Soc. Amer. 2: 16.

    Google Scholar 

  • McClintock, B., 1931. “Cytological observations of deficiencies involving known genes, translocations and an inversion inZea mays”. Mo. Agric. Exp. Sta. Bull. 163: 30 pp.

  • Mohr, O. L., 1919, “Character changes caused by mutation of an entire region of a chromosome inDrosophila”. Genetics 4: 275–282.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohr, O. L., 1923a. “Das Deficiency-Phänomen beiDrosophila melanogaster”. Z. f. ind. Abst. u. Vererb. 30: 279–283.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohr, O. L., 1923b. “Modifications of the sex-ratio through a sex-linked semi-lethal inDrosophila melanogaster. (Besides notes on an autosomal section deficiency)”. Studia Mendeliana, Brunn: 1–22.

  • Mohr, O. L., 1923c. “A genetic and cytological analysis of a section deficiency involving four units of the X-chromosome inDrosophila melanogaster”. Z. f. ind. Abst. u. Vererb. 32: 108–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mohr, O. L., 1927. “Exaggeration and inhibition phenomena”. (Abstr.) Verh. d. V. intern. Kong. f. Vererb., Sup. Bd. II d. Z. f. ind. Abst. u. Vererb., publ. 1928: 1135.

  • Mohr, O. L., 1929. “Exaggeration and inhibition phenomena encountered in the analysis of an autosomal dominant”. Z. f. ind. Abst. u. Vererb. 50: 113–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mohr, O. L., 1932. “On the potency of mutant genes and wild-type allelomorphs”. Proc. 6th Intern. Cong. Gen. 1: 190–212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, T. H., 1929. “Data relating to six mutants ofDrosophila”. Carn. Inst. Wash. Publ. 399: 169–199.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, T. H., C. B. Bridges andA. H. Sturtevant, 1925. “The genetics ofDrosophila”. Bibliographia Genetica 2: 262 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muller, H. J., 1932. “Further studies on the nature and causes of gene mutations”. Proc. 6th Intern. Cong. Gen. 1: 213–255.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muller, H. J. andA. A. Prokofyeva, 1934. “Continuity and discontinuity of the hereditary material”. C. R. d. Acad. Sc. d. U.S.S.R. 4: 74–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muller, H. J., A. A. Prokofyeva andD. Raffel, 1934. “Minute intergenic rearrangement as a cause of apparent gene mutation.” Nature (In press).

  • Patterson, J. T., 1932. “A gene for viability in the X-chromosome ofDrosophila”. Z. f. ind. Abst. u. Vererb. 60: 125–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Serebrovsky, A. S. andM. G. Zubina, 1930. “About the limits of dividing capacity of the scute gene”. Trans. of Fourth Cong. of Z., A. and H. of U.S.S.R.

  • Vejdovsky, F., 1911. “Die Vererbungsträger”. Prag.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Muller, H.J. The origination of chromatin deficiencies as minute deletions subject to insertion elsewhere. Genetica 17, 237–252 (1935). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01985012

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01985012

Keywords

Navigation