Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology

, Volume 24, Issue 2, pp 144–148 | Cite as

Microbiological leaching of sulfide minerals with different percolation regimes

  • Jaakko Puhakka
  • Olli H. Tuovinen
Biotechnology Short Contribution
  • 18 Downloads

Summary

The microbiological leaching of Fe, Al, Zn, Cu, Ni and Co from sulfide ore material was evaluated with four percolation regimes involving trickle and flood leaching. Continuous circulation of the leach solution associated with flood leaching resulted in the highest rates of leaching of Ni (44% recovery), Zn (25%), Co (18%), and Cu (8%) over a period of about half a year. Iron and aluminum recoveries remained low because of their precipitation. Bacterial counts increased from 3.2×106 to 4.8×107 iron-oxidizers and from 6.6×106 to 1.8×107 glucose-oxidizers per ml leach solution. Microscopic counts reached a maximum of 4.9×108 cells per ml. Neither microscopic nor viable counts reflected the time course and the progress of the leaching. However, both the microscopic and viable counts were highest with the continuous flooding technique which also yielded the fastest rates of metal solubilization.

Keywords

Iron Precipitation Aluminum Sulfide Leaching 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Atkins AS, Pooley FD (1983) Comparison of bacterial reactors employed in the oxidation of sulphide concentrates. In: Rossi G, Torma AE (eds) Recent progress in biohydrometallurgy. Associazione Mineraria Sarda, Iglesias, Italy, pp 111–125Google Scholar
  2. Bruynesteyn A (1985) Application of microbiological methods to underground leaching of uranium ores. In: Karavaiko GI, Groudev SN (eds) Biogeotechnology of metals. Centre of International Projects (United Nations Environment Programme), Moscow, USSR, pp 315–326Google Scholar
  3. Goodman AE, Babij T, Ritchie AIM (1983) Leaching of a sulphide ore byThiobacillus ferrooxidans under anaerobic conditions. In: Rossi G, Torma AE (eds) Recent progress in biohydrometallurgy. Associazione Mineraria Sarda, Iglesias, Italy, pp 361–376Google Scholar
  4. Johnson WM, Maxwell JA (1981) Rock and mineral analysis. 2nd edn, John Wiley & Sons, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  5. Lundgren DG, Silver M (1980) Ore leaching by bacteria. Annu Rev Microbiol 34:263–283PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Puhakka J, Tuovinen OH (1986) Biological leaching of sulfide minerals with the use of shake flask, aerated column, airlift reactor, and percolation techniques. Acta Biotechnol 6 (in press)Google Scholar
  7. Sugio T, Domatsu C, Munakata O, Tano T, Imai K (1985) Role of a ferric ion-reducing system in sulfur oxidation ofThiobacillus ferrooxidans. Appl Environ Microbiol 49:1401–1406Google Scholar
  8. Torma AE (1977) The role ofThiobacillus ferrooxidans in hydrometallurgical processes. Adv Biochem Engin 6:1–37Google Scholar
  9. Tuovinen OH, Silver M, Martin PAW, Dugan PR (1981) The Agnew Lake uranium mine leach liquors: chemical examinations, bacterial enumeration, and composition of plasmid DNA of iron-oxidizing thiobacilli. In: Proceedings of international conference on the use of microorganisms in hydrometallurgy. Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Pécs, pp 59–69Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1986

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jaakko Puhakka
    • 1
  • Olli H. Tuovinen
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of MicrobiologyUniversity of HelsinkiHelsinkiFinland
  2. 2.Department of MicrobiologyThe Ohio State UniversityColumbusUSA

Personalised recommendations