Advertisement

International Urogynecology Journal

, Volume 9, Issue 2, pp 103–107 | Cite as

A mathematical model for micturition gives new insights into pressure measurement and function

  • P. E. Papa Petros
  • M. B. Bush
Original Article

Abstract

Our objective was to analyze the factors contributing to the development of detrusor pressure during micturition in the female with reference to a mathematical model. One hundred patients with predominantly stress incontinence were investigated with micturition pressure studies. Frictional and dynamic losses were estimated at various flow rates using a mathematical model. Almost 25% of patients recorded a micturition pressure below 11 cmH2O at peak flow (mean 23 cmH2O, range 0–91). Large inter- and intrapatient variations in micturition pressures were recorded on retesting. The low pressures were explained by a recently described external opening mechanism, backward stretching of the vagina during micturition by the muscles of the pelvic floor. This opened out the outflow tract and created the potential for a falsely high Pabd. The large variability in micturition pressures on retesting was attributed to changes in urethral radius being magnified to the fourth power. It was concluded that, micturition itself, and the components for pressure generation, are complex non-linear entities which appear to be greatly modified by the external striated pelvic floor opening mechanism. Addressing anatomical defects in this mechanism may be a fruitful route of future enquiry in females with emptying problems.

Keywords

Micturition Muscle force Pelvic floor Urethral resistance Urine flow 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Blaivas JG. The neurophysiology of micturition: a clinical study of 550 patients.J Urol 1982;127:958–962PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Constantinou CE. Principles and methods of clinical urodynamic investigations,CRC Crit Rev Biomed Eng 1982;229–264Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Smith JC. Urethral resistance to micturition.Br J Urol 1968;40:125–156PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Griffiths DJ. Hydrodynamics of male micturition I. Theory of steady flow through elastic walled tubes.Med Biol Eng 1971;9:581–588PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Griffiths DJ. Urodynamic assessment of bladder function.Br J Urol 1977;49:29–36.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Spangberg A, Terio H. Engberg A, Ask P. Quantification of urethral function based on Griffith's model of flow through elastic tubes.Neurourol Urodyn 1989;8:29–52Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Walter JS, Wheeler JS. Morgan C, Plishka M. Urodynamic evaluation of urethral opening in females with stress incontinence.Int Urogynecol J 1993;4:335–341CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Petros PE, Ulmsten U. Role of the pelvic floor in bladder neck opening and closure: I muscle forces.Int Urogynecol J 1977;8:74–80Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Petros PE, Ulmsten U. Role of the pelvic floor in bladder neck opening and closure: II vagina.Int Urogynecol 1997;8:69–73.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bush MB, Petros PE, Barrett-Lennard B. On the flow through the human female urethra.J Biomech 1997;30;9:967–969CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    International Continence Society. Committee on Standardisation of Terminology of Lower Urinary Tract Function.Scand J Urol Nephrol 1988;Supplementum 114:5–19Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Creed K. Functional diversity of smooth muscle.Br Med Bull 1979;3:243–247Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hill AV. The heat of shortening and the dynamic constance of muscle.Proc Royal Soc Lond B 1938;126:136–195Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Griffiths DJ. Assessment of detrusor contraction strength or contractility.Neurourol Urodyn 1991;10:1–18Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Petros PE. Symptoms of defective emptying and raised residual urine may arise from ligamentous laxity in the posterior vaginal fornix.Gynecol Obstet Invest 1998;45:105–108CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Petros PE. Ambulatory repair of urinary dysfunction based on the anatomical classification improves stress, urge, and abnormal emptying.Int Urogynecol J 1997;8:270–278Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Khullar V, Salvatore S, Cardozo L, Hill S, Kelleher C. Bladder outlet obstruction quantification: a poorly reproducible test. Proceedings of the International Continence Society, Sydney.Neurourol Urodyn 1995;14:526–527Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Ltd 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • P. E. Papa Petros
    • 1
  • M. B. Bush
    • 2
  1. 1.Royal Perth HospitalPerthAustralia
  2. 2.Department of Mechanical and Materials EngineeringUniversity of Western AustraliaPerthAustralia

Personalised recommendations