Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Evaluation of an automated system for identification of anaerobic bacteria

  • Article
  • Published:
European Journal of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A fully automated computer-assisted system (ATB system, bioMérieux, France) which uses disposable microenzymatic panels was evaluated for its ability to identify 215 strains of anaerobic bacteria (clinical isolates and reference strains). All strains were examined using conventional identification protocols and by gas chromatographic analysis of short-chain fatty acids. Automated reading of Rapid ID32A test kits (bio-Mérieux, France) by the ATB system gave correct identification for 195 strains (90.7 %): 92.25 % of gram-negative anaerobes (116 strains) and 89 % of gram-positive anaerobes (99 strains) were correctly identified. Twelve strains (5.6 %) were incorrectly identified and 8 strains (3.7 %) were not identified by the system. For some strains in theBacteroides fragilis group, forClostridium difficile and for theFusobacterium genus, additional tests suggested by the ATB software were necessary to reach a final identification at the species or genus level. On the basis of the high incidence of correct identifications and the comparison of these results with those obtained previously using other commercially available kits, the ATB system was found to be a reliable method for identification of anaerobic bacteria in clinical laboratories.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Rodloff AC, Appelbaum PC, Zabransky RJ Practical anaerobic bacteriology. In: Cumulative techniques and procedures in clinical microbiology. American Society for Microbiology, Washington DC, 1991, p. 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Cavallero A, Arzese A, Frongillo RF, Bianchi P, Botta GA Characterization of an outbreak ofC. perfringens food poisoning by quantitative faecal culture, toxin measurement and SDS-PAGE analysis. Microecology and Therapy 1989, 18: 189–195.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Radin L, Arzese A, Lucarelli C, Botta GA Rapid identification ofBacteroides species by high-performance liquid chromatography. Journal of Chromatography 1988, 459: 331–335.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Goldstein EJC, Citron DM, Goldman RJ National hospital survey of anaerobic culture and susceptibility testing methods: results and recommendations for improvement. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 1992, 30: 1529–1534.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Applebaum PC, Kaufmann CS, Depenbusch JW Accuracy and reproducibility of a four-hour method for anaerobic identification. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 1985, 21: 894–898.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Burlage RS, Ellner PD Comparison of the PRAS II, ANIdent and RapiID-ANA systems for identification of anaerobic bacteria. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 1985, 22: 32–35.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Murray PR, Weber CJ, Niles AC Comparative evaluation of three identification systems of anaerobes. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 1985, 22: 52–55.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Botta GA, Amato G, Biavati B, Braga A, Ferrari A, Mastrantonio P, Menozzi MG, Privitera G Valutazione comparativa di cinque sistemi per l'identificazione dei batteri anacrobi: studio policentrico. In: Proceedings of the XVI AMCLI Congress. Associazione Microbiologi Clinici Italiani Publishing, Milan, 1987, p. 7–22.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Quentin C, Desailly-Chanson MA, Bebear C Evaluation of An-Ident. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 1991, 29: 231–235.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Dowell VR, Hawkins TM CDC laboratory manual. Centers for Disease Control, Atlanta, GA, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Holdeman LV, Cato E, Moore WEC Anaerobe laboratory manual. Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Sutter VL, Citron DM, Edelstein MAC, Finegold Wadsworth anaerobic bacteriology manual. Star Publishing Co., Belmont, CA, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Dybowski W, Franklin DA Conditional probability and the identification of bacteria: a pilot study. Journal of General Microbiology 1968, 27: 273–290.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Willcox WR, Lapage SP, Bascombs S, Curtis MA Identification of bacteria by computer: theory and programming. Journal of General Microbiology 1973, 77: 317–330.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kitch TT, Appelbaum PC Accuracy and reproducibility of the 4-hour ATB 32A method for anaerobe identification. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 1989, 27: 2509–2513.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Looney WJ, Gallusser AJC, Modde HK Evaluation of the ATB 32A system for the identification of anaerobic bacteria isolated from clinical specimens. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 1990, 28: 1519–1524.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Microbiology, School of Medicine, University of Udine, 33100, Udine, Italy

    A. Arzese, R. Minisini & G. A. Botta

Authors
  1. A. Arzese
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. R. Minisini
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. G. A. Botta
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Arzese, A., Minisini, R. & Botta, G.A. Evaluation of an automated system for identification of anaerobic bacteria. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 13, 135–141 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01982186

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01982186

Keywords

Search

Navigation