Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Verschilen in de overdracht van het bloemkoolmozaiekvirus bij Myzus persicae Sulzer en Brevicoryne brassicae L.

With a summary: Differences in the transmission of the cauliflower mosaic virus by myzus persicae sulzer and brevicoryne brassicae L.

  • Published:
Tijdschrift Over Plantenziekten Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The results of the first test indicate that the cauliflower mosaic virus belongs to the non-persistent viruses as defined byWatson enRoberts (1939).

The results of the second test, and the new definition of non-persistent viruses byWatson (1946) would, however, place cauliflower-mosaic in the persistent viruses.

WithMyzus persicae very short infection feeding times probably will result in a response to the period of preliminary fasting but withBrevicoryne brassicae this can not be expected. Therefore the definition ofWatson (1946) is in my opinion not an improvement of the definition ofWatson enRoberts (1939).

The response of the vectors to preliminary fasting time, with regard to the non-persistent viruses, is not constant and needs further research. From the results of the second test it is also evident that long infection feeding times do not always result in a deminishing of the efficiency of the vector; in certain cases they result in an increase in efficiency.

The results of the third trial make it evident that the virus protein is inactivated rapidly byMyzus persicae during a post infection fasting period. WithBrevicoryne brassicae this inactivation is very slow.

It may be that we have here a case of adaption of the cabbage aphid to the. cauliflower mosaic virus.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Literatuur

  • Van Hoof, H. A. — 1954. Enkele gegevens over de melige koolluis (Brevicoryne brassicae L.) in het Geestmerambacht en zijn bestrijding. T.o.P. 60: 131–135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keuls, M. — 1952. The use of the „studentized range” in connection with an analysis of variance. Euphytica 1: 112–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, F. M. — 1940. Studies on the feeding methods and penetration rates of Myzus persicae (Sulz.), Myzus circumflexus (Buckt.) and Macrosiphum gei (Koch). Ann. appl. Biol. 27: 348–358.

    Google Scholar 

  • Severin, H. H. P. &Tompkins, C. M. — 1948. Aphid transmission of cauliflower mosaic virus. Hilgardia 18: 389–404.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, M. A. — 1946. The transmission of beet mosaic and beet yellows viruses by aphides; a comparative study of a non-persistent and a persistent virus having host plants and vectors in common. Proc. roy. Soc. B. 133: 200–219.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, M. A. &Roberts, F. M. — 1939. A comparative study of the transmission of Hyocyamus virus 3, Potato virus Y and Cucumber virus 1 bij the vectors Myzus persicae (Sulz.), M. circumflexus (Buckton) and Macrosiphum gei (Koch). Proc. roy. Soc. B 127: 543–576.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Instituut voor Plantenziektenkundig Onderzoek (I.P.O.), Wageningen

    H. A. van Hoof

Authors
  1. H. A. van Hoof
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

Voor de wiskundige verwerking van de gegevens zeg ikIr L. C. A. Corsten gaarne dank.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

van Hoof, H.A. Verschilen in de overdracht van het bloemkoolmozaiekvirus bij Myzus persicae Sulzer en Brevicoryne brassicae L.. Tijdschrift Over Plantenziekten 60, 267–272 (1954). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01980144

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01980144

Keywords

Search

Navigation