Skip to main content
Log in

Mineral nutrition and the water relations of plants

I. A comparison of the effects of mineral-free water and nutrient solutions on water uptake and transpiration

  • Published:
Plant and Soil Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The rates of water uptake and transpiration of young plants of tomato, sweet corn, lettuce, and spring wheat were measured when they were transferred from ordinary culture solution into nutrient solutions of different concentrations or into mineral-free water.

Uptake per unit fresh weight of root and transpiration per unit fresh weight of shoot and per unit leaf area were markedly lower in mineral-free water than in nutrient solutions with OPs of 0.1 to 0.5 atm. The reduction did not appear until a day or more after the plants were placed in mineral-free water. For a few hours after transfer, uptake from mineral-free water was usually higher than from nutrient solutions.

The effect of mineral-free water was not associated with the reduced OP of the medium, lack of aeration or low pH. Mineral-free water reduced the stomatal aperture and the water content of the shoots, indicating that mineral nutrients played an important role in the water economy of the plants.

It was concluded the reduced uptake and transpiration in mineral-free water were not merely direct consequences of reduced growth and that there is a specific requirement for mineral salts if maximum water uptake and transpiration are to occur.

At night, mineral-free water usually exerted a large effect on uptake, including the complete suppression of guttation. In the daytime, with a few exceptions, the higher the radiation intensity the greater was the effect of mineral-free water on uptake. These results suggest that mineral-free water affects both active water transport arising from root pressure and passive transport in the transpiration stream.

It is suggested that some of the conflicting results in the literature may have been caused by differences in the radiation conditions or by differences in the duration of the experiments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Alvim, P. de t., A new type of porometer for measuring stomatal opening and its use in irrigation studies. Proc. Montpellier Symp. Eco-physiology. UNESCO Arid Zone Research25, 325–329 (1965).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Alvim, P. de t. and Havis, J. R., An improved infiltration series for studying stomatal opening as illustrated with coffee. Plant Physiol.29, 97–98 (1945).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bouyoucos, G. J., Transpiration of wheat seedlings as affected by soils, by solutions of different densities and by various chemical compounds. Proc. Am. Soc. Agron. for 19113, 130–191 (1912).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Broyer, T. C., Some gross correlations between growth enlargement and the solute and water relations of plants, with special emphasis on the relation of turgor pressure to distension of cells. Plant Physiol.25, 420–432 (1950).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Crafts, A. S. and Broyer, T. C., Migration of salts and water into xylem of the roots of higher plants. Am. J. Botany25, 529–535 (1938).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Drew, D. H., A nutrient requirement for optimum water absorption by intact root systems. Nature199, 93–94 (1963).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Eaton, F. M., Water uptake and root growth as influenced by irregularities in the concentration of the substrate. Plant Physiol.16, 545–564 (1941).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Greb, H., Der Einfluss tiefer Temperatur auf die Wasser- und Stickstoffaufnahme der Pflanzen und ihre Bedeutung für das ‘Xeromorphicproblem’. Planta48, 523–563 (1957).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Harter, L. L., The influence of a mixture of soluble salts, principally sodium chlorid, upon the leaf structure and transpiration of wheat, oats and barley. U.S. Dept. Agr. Bur. Plant Ind. Bull.134, pp. 22 (1908).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hewitt, E. J., Sand and water culture methods used in the study of plant nutrition. Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux, Farnham Royal (1952).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kisser, J., Untersuchungen über den Einfluss der Nährsalze auf die Wasserabgabe, Wasseraufnahme, relative Spross- und Wurzelmasse und die Blattstruktur. Planta3, 562–577 (1927).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kramer, P. J., Plant and Soil Water Relationships. McGraw-Hill, New York (1949).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Long, E. M., The effect of salt additions to the substrate on intake of water and nutrients by roots of approachgrafted tomatoes. Am. J. Botany30, 594–601 (1943).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Meyer, B. S., Effects of mineral salts upon the transpiration and water requirement of the cotton plant. Am. J. Botany18, 79–93 (1931).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Millar, C. E., Availability of nutrients in subsoils. Soil Sci.19, 275–285 (1925).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Millar, C. E., Availability to corn of nutrients in the A2 and B horizons of Hillsdale loam. J. Am. Soc. Agron.25, 418–426 (1933).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Negisi, K., Satoo, T. and Yagi, K., A method for the rapid measuring of leaf areas. J. Japan. Forestry Soc.39, 380–384 (1957).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Pleasants, A. L., The effect of nitrate fertilizer on stomatal behaviour. J. Elisha Mitchell Sci. Soc.46, 95–116 (1930).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Reed, H. S., The effect of certain chemical agents upon the transpiration and growth of wheat seedlings. Botan. Gaz.49, 81–109 (1910).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Sachs, J., Bericht über die physiologische Tätigkeit an der Nersuchstation in Tharandt. I. Ueber den Einfluss der chemischen und physikalischen Beschaffenheit des Bodens auf die Transpiration der Pflanzen. Landwirtsch. Vers.-Sta.1, 203–240 (1859).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Schorn, M., Untersuchungen über die Verwendbarkeit der Alkohol-fixierungs-und Infiltrationsmethode zur Messung von Spaltoeffnungsweiten. Jahrb. wiss. Botan.71, 783–840 (1929).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Slatyer, R. O., Effects of several osmotic substrates on the water relationships of tomato. Australian J. Biol. Sci.14, 519–540 (1961).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Stålfelt, M. G., The stomata as a hydrophotic regulator of the water deficit of the plant. Physiol. Plantarum8, 572–593 (1955).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Tagawa, T., The relation between absorption of water by plant root and the concentration and nature of the surrounding solution. Japan. J. Botany7, 33–60 (1934).

    Google Scholar 

  25. True, R. H., The harmful action of distilled water. Am. J. Botany1, 255–273 (1914).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Wallace, A., Uptake of mannitol by bush bean plants and distribution in plant parts.In: Solute uptake by intact plants (Ed. A. Wallace), 90–92. A. Wallace, Los Angeles (1963).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Wilson, J. D. and Livingston, B. E., Lag in water absorption by plants in water culture with respect to changes in wind. Plant Physiol.12, 135–150 (1937).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Drew, D.H. Mineral nutrition and the water relations of plants. Plant Soil 26, 158–174 (1967). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01978681

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01978681

Keywords

Navigation