Skip to main content
Log in

A laboratory assessment of ciprofloxacin and comparable antimicrobial agents

  • Published:
European Journal of Clinical Microbiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The in vitro activity of ciprofloxacin against a wide range of bacterial isolates was assessed in comparison with norfloxacin, enoxacin, co-trimoxazole and penicillin (or ampicillin) where appropriate. Minimal inhibitory concentrations (MICs) indicated that ciprofloxacin was highly active against gram-negative bacilli of the Enterobacteriaceae andPseudomonas groups, notably against strains resistant to gentamicin. Similarly,Staphylococcus aureus (including methicillin-resistant strains) andHaemophilus influenzae were susceptible, regardless of penicillinase production. Norfloxacin and enoxacin were less active than ciprofloxacin against the majority of species tested, although enoxacin blood levels were generally higher. Most co-trimoxazole-resistant strains were susceptible to the quinoline group of drugs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price includes VAT (France)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Wise, R., Andrews, J. M., Edwards, L. J.: In vitro activity of Bay o 9867, a new quinoline derivative, compared with those of other antimicrobial agents. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 1983, 23: 559–564.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bauernfeind, A., Petermuller, C.: In vitro activity of ciprofloxacin, norfloxacin and nalidixic acid. European Journal of Clinical Microbiology 1983, 2: 111–115.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Muytjens, H. L., van der Ros-van de Repe, J., van Veldhuizen, G.: Comparative activities of ciprofloxacin (Bay o 9867), norfloxacin, pipemidic acid, and nalidixic acid. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 1983, 24: 302–304.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Corrado, M. L., Cherubin, C. E., Shulman, M.: The comparative activity of norfloxacin with other antimicrobial agents against gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy 1983, 11: 369–376.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Kouno, K., Inoue, M., Mitsuhashi, S.: In vitro and in vivo antibacterial activity of AT-2266. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 1983, 24: 78–84.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Boppana, V. K., Swanson, B. N.: Determination of norfloxacin, a new nalidixic acid analog, in human serum and urine by high performance liquid chromatography. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 1982, 21: 808–810.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Saito, T., Yamad, Y., Arai, T.: Studies on AM-715: Biliary excretion, tissue concentrations in the liver and the gall bladder and clinical evaluation in the surgical field. Chemotherapy (Tokyo) 1981, 29, Supplement 4: 631–638.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Matsumuto, K., Suziki, H., Tsuchihasi, K., Niyazaki, A., Shishido, H., Noguchi, Y., Watanabe, K.: Laboratory and clinical studies on AM-715. Chemotherapy (Tokyo) 1981, 29, Supplement 4: 370–379.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Rylander, M., Norrby, S. R.: Norfloxacin: penetration into subcutaneous tissue cage fluid in rabbits and in vivo efficacy. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 1983, 23: 352–355.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Haase, D., Urias, B., Harding, G., Ronald, A.: Comparative in vitro activity of norfloxacin against urinary tract pathogens. European Journal of Clinical Microbiology 1983, 2: 235–241.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Shrire, L., Saunders, J., Traynor, R. et al. A laboratory assessment of ciprofloxacin and comparable antimicrobial agents. Eur. J, Clin. Microbiol. 3, 328–332 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01977488

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01977488

Keywords

Navigation