Abstract
The in vitro activity of Ro 09-1428, a new catechol-type parenteral cephalosporin, was compared to that of ceftazidime, E-1040, cefpirome and cefepime against gram-positive and gramnegative organisms. Ro 09-1428 inhibited group A streptococci at ≤0.12 µg/ml, and group B, C and G streptococci andStreptococcus pneumoniae at 0.5 µg/ml, whereas forStaphylococcus aureus Ro 09-1428 had MICs of 8–16 µg/ml similar to ceftazidime and E-1040. AgainstPseudomonas aeruginosa Ro 09-1428 was the most active agent, inhibiting isolates at ≤0.12–2 µg/ml, and inhibited ceftazidime-resistant isolates. The majority ofEscherichia coli, Klebsiella spp.,Proteus mirabilis, Citrobacter diversus, Providencia, Salmonella andShigella were inhibited by ≤0.5 µg/ml as with the other cephalosporins. For mostCitrobacter freundii andEnterobacter cloacae Ro 09-1428 had higher MICs of 4–16 µg/ml; most ceftazidime-resistant isolates of these species were resistant. Anaerobes, enterococci andListeria monocytogenes were resistant to Ro 09-1428. Ro 09-1428 was not hydrolyzed by TEM-1, TEM-2,Staphylococcus aureus PC-1,Moraxella catarrhalis Bro-1,Enterobacter P-99,Pseudomonas aeruginosa Sabath-Abraham orKlebsiella beta-lactamases, but was hydrolyzed by TEM-3, TEM-7 and TEM-9. Ro 09-1428 was markedly less active at an acid pH.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Neu HC Beta-lactam antibiotics: structural relationships affecting in vitro activity and pharmacologic properties. Reviews of Infectious Diseases 1986, 8, Supplement 3: 237–259.
Pearson PD, Steigbigel RT, Davis HT, Chapman SW Method for reliable determination of minimal lethal concentrations. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 1980, 18: 699–708.
Neu HC Antibiotic inactivating enzymes and bacterial resistance. In: Lorian V (ed): Antibiotics in laboratory medicine. Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore, MD, 1986, p. 757–789.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Chin, N.X., Gu, J.W., Fang, W. et al. In vitro activity of Ro 09-1428 compared to other cephalosporins. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 10, 669–675 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01975824
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01975824