Skip to main content
Log in

Quality control in antimicrobial disk susceptibility testing: A Belgian multicenter study

  • Notes
  • Published:
European Journal of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A Belgian multicenter trial was conducted to evaluate problems encountered with quality control results of antimicrobial disk susceptibility testing and to compare the performance of BBL disks and Rosco tablets. Over a period of four weeks 18 laboratories daily tested three reference strains against eight antibiotics. A standardised method was used by all participants. For all results together 10.4 % and 7.3 % of the measurements with BBL disks and Rosco tablets, respectively, were outside the recommended range. Major problems were observed for some specific strain-antibiotic combinations. Standard deviations were similar for both systems; their precision was comparable. The results suggest that cooperation between manufacturers and some reference laboratories could be improved in order to establish optimal quality control limits.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bauer AW, Kirby WM, Sherris JC, Turck M Antibiotic susceptibility testing by a standardized single disk method. American Journal of Clinical Pathology 1966, 45: 493–496.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Miller JM, Addison BV, Caudill SP Antimicrobic susceptibility testing: new quality control guidelines. Clinical Microbiology Newsletter 1986, 10: 74–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Witebsky FG Controversies in antimicrobial susceptibility testing. Clinics in Laboratory Medicine 1984, 4: 99–121.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards Performance standards for antimicrobial disk susceptibility tests. Approved standard M2-A4. NCCLS, Villanova, PA, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Pollock HM, Barry AL, Gavan TL, Fuchs PC, Hansen S, Thornsberry CL, Frankel H, Forsythe SB Selection of a reference lot of Mueller-Hinton agar. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 1986, 24: 1–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Murray PR, Zeitinger JR Evaluation of Mueller-Hinton agar for disk diffusion susceptibility tests. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 1983, 18: 1269–1271.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Frankel H, Pollock HM Implementation of the Mueller-Hinton agar reference standard program. Antimicrobic Newsletter 1987, 4: 37–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kaufman L, Rousseeuw P Finding groups in data: an introduction to cluster analysis. J. Wiley, New York, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kenny MA, Pollock HM, Minshew BH, Casillas E, Schoenknecht FD Cation components of Mueller-Hinton agar affecting testingPseudomonas aeruginosa susceptibility to gentamycin. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 1980, 17: 55–62.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Washington JA II, Yu PKW, Gavan TL, Schoenknecht FD, Thornsberry C Interpretation of the disk susceptibility test for amikacin: report of a collaborative study. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 1979, 15: 400–407.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Woolfrey BF, Fox JM, Quall CO, Lally RT Error rates associated with the use of recently proposed break-points for testingPseudomonas aeruginosa versus gentamicin, tobramycin, and amikacin by the standardized disk agar diffusion test. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 1983, 24: 764–770.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Boyce JM, Lonks JR, Medeiros AA, Papa EF, Campbell S Spurious oxacillin resistance inStaphylococcus aureus because of defective oxacillin disks. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 1988, 26: 1425–1427.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. College of American Pathologists CAP surveys, bacteriology survey, set D-A, final critique. College of American Pathologists, Northfield, IL 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Pfeiffer RR, Engel GL, Coleman D Stable antibiotic sensitivity disks. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 1976, 9: 848–851.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Participating microbiologists and their affiliations: A. Bellon (Onze Lieve Vrouw Ziekenhuis, Aalst), J. Colaert (Kliniek Maria's Voorzienigheid, Kortrijk), M. Denef (Stedelijk Onze Lieve Vrouw Ziekenhuis, Mechelen), H. Goossens (Universitair Ziekenhuis St. Pieter, Brussel), M. Lontie (Medisch Centrum voor Huisartsen, Leuven), P. Maes (St. Jozef Kliniek, Oostende), A. Mertens (Algemeen Ziekenhuis Middelheim, Antwerpen), H.J. Mertens (St. Jansziekenhuis, Genk), S.R. Pattyn (Universitair Ziekenhuis, Antwerpen), P. Piot (Instituut Tropische Geneeskunde, Antwerpen), J.L. Rummens (Virga Jesse Ziekenhuis, Hasselt), H. Van Landuyt (Algemeen Ziekenhuis St. Jan, Brugge), L. Van Nimmen (Ziekenhuis “De Bijloke”, Gent), R. Van Noyen (Imelda Ziekenhuis, Bonheiden), J. Verhaegen (Stuyvenberg Zickenhuis, Antwerpen), G. Verschraegen (Universitair Ziekenhuis, Gent), L. Verbist (Universitair Ziekenhuis St. Rafaël, Leuven).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lauwers, S., Philippe, J., Van Zeebroeck, A. et al. Quality control in antimicrobial disk susceptibility testing: A Belgian multicenter study. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 10, 652–656 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01975819

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01975819

Keywords

Navigation