Skip to main content
Log in

Presumptive identification ofSalmonella enterica using two rapid tests

  • Notes
  • Published:
European Journal of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Two rapid test for early detection ofSalmonella enterica, the cytochrome oxidase test and a fluorescence test, were evaluated in 1,200 colonies which had been isolated from human feces and cultured on MacConkey and Salmonella-Shigella media. Using the fluorescence test there were no false negative results (sensitivity 100 %) and of 205 positive cases 62 did not correspond biochemically to salmonella (specificity 94.1 %); 44 of these 62 were positive in the cytochrome oxidase test, raising the specificity to 98.2 %. In conclusion, the combination of the two tests could be very useful due to the ease of performance, low cost and excellent results obtained.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bicknell AK, Butt F, Mattman L The rapid identification of enteric organisms by microtechnique. American Journal of Public Health 1952, 42: 437–439.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Sanders AC, Okabe K A method for screening nonpathogens in feces. US Armed Forces Medical Journal 1953, 4: 1053–1055.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Edwards EA, Hilderbrand RL Method for identifyingSalmonella andShigella directly from the primary isolation plate by coagglutination of protein A containing staphylococci sensitized with specific antibody. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 1976, 3: 339–343.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Metzler J, Nachamkim I Evaluation of a latex agglutination test for the detection ofSalmonella andShigella spp. by using broth enrichment. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 1988, 26: 2501–2504.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Sanborn WR, Lesmana M, Edwards EA Enrichment culture coagglutination test for rapid, low-cost diagnosis of salmonellosis. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 1980, 12: 151–155.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Teti G, Burdash NM, Zamboni C, Fava C, Tomasello F, Mastroeni P Evaluation of a rapid method to exclude the presence of certain enteric pathogens in stool specimens. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 1984, 20: 1049–1052.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Welkos S, Schreiber M, Baer H Identification ofSalmonella with the 0–1 bacteriophage. Applied Microbiology 1974, 28: 618–622.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Greene LC, Applebaum PC, Kellogg JA Evaluation of a two-hour method for screening pathogens from stool specimens. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 1984, 20: 285–287.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Stell RS, Talley MS, Sheels MR, Lanier GA Comparison of enzyme linked immunoabsorbent assay, hemagglutination inhibition and passive latex agglutination of determination of rubeolla immune status. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 1985, 21: 140–142.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ruiz, J., Varela, M.C., Sempere, M.A. et al. Presumptive identification ofSalmonella enterica using two rapid tests. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 10, 649–651 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01975818

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01975818

Keywords

Navigation