Skip to main content
Log in

Some problems with the diamine oxidase (DAO) assay using putrescine as substrate in rat liver

  • Allergy and Histamine
  • Published:
Agents and Actions Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Determination of diamine oxidase (DAO) activity in rat liver preparations by measuring the formation of radioactive δ1-pyrroline from14C-putrescine is complicated by the complexity of competing metabolic pathways. This can lead to complete masking of the DAO activity present when rat liver homogenates are used as the enzyme source. However, subcellular fractionation of rat liver homogenates makes it possible to detect some putrescine oxidizing activity in the microsomal fraction when assayed at pH 8.5. When 1 mM putrescine was used as the substrate, over 90% of this activity was inhibited by 6×10−4 M selegiline (deprenyl), indicating that monoamine oxidase (MAO) rather than DAO activity was being measured. The observed activity was also interfered with by agents that reduced acetylation processes and polyamine synthesis. A different picture appears when μM concentrations of putrescine are used: in these conditions all interference is strongly reduced and DAO activity can be measured in rat liver microsomes. Furthermore, kinetic studies on deaminative oxidation of14C-putrescine at concentrations from 1 μM to 5 mM confirm the existence of two enzymes: one with a high affinity for the substrate and similar to intestinal mucosa DAO in its sensitivity to α-aminoguanidine, and the other one with a low affinity and selegiline-sensitive.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. M. P. Argento-Cerù and F. Autuori,Localization of diamine oxidase in animal tissue. InStructure and Function of Amine Oxidases. (Ed. Mondovì B.) pp. 89–104, CRC Press, New York 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  2. F. Buffoni, G. Ignesti, R. Pirisino and C. Cortesini,Glutamate-oxaloacetate transaminase, monoamine oxidase, diamine oxidase and mixed function oxidase activities in rat liver after portocaval shunt. Pharmacol. Res. Commun.14, 771–777 (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  3. A. Sessa, M. A. Desiderio, M. Baizini and A. Perin,Diamine oxidase activity in regenerating rat liver and in 4-dimethyl-aminoazobenzene-induced and Yoshida AH130 hepatomas. Cancer Res.41, 1929–1934 (1981).

    Google Scholar 

  4. A. Perin, A. Sessa and M. A. Desiderio,Response of tissue diamine oxidase activity to polyamine administration. Biochem. J.234, 119–223 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  5. J. Kusche, H. Richter, R. Hersterberg, J. Schmidt and W. Lorenz,Comparison of the 14 C putrescine assay with the NADH test for the determination of diamine oxidase: Description of a standard procedure with a high precision and improved accuracy. Agents and Actions3, 148–156 (1973).

    Google Scholar 

  6. W. A. Fogel, T. Bieganski, J. Wozniak and C. Maslinski,Interference of aldehyde metabolising enzymes with diamine oxidase/histaminase/activity as determinated by 14 C putrescine method. Biochem. Pharmacol.27, 1139–1162 (1978).

    Google Scholar 

  7. N. Seiler,Acetylpolyamines as substrates of amine oxidase. In:Structure and Function of Amine Oxidase (Ed. B. Mondovì) pp. 21–36, CRC Press, New York 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  8. G. Ignesti, M. Perreti and F. Buffoni,Induction and quail liver diamine oxidase (histaminase). Part 1: Interference of spermidine synthase on the diamine oxidase activity assay using putrescine as substrate. Agents and Actions25, 37–42 (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  9. S. Beninati, M. Piacentini, M. P. Argento-Cerù, S. Russo-Caia and F. Autuori,Presence of di- and polyamines covalently bound to protein in rat liver. Biochim. Biophys. Res. Commun.841, 120–126 (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  10. G. Ignesti, G. Banchelli, L. Raimondi, R. Pirisino and F. Buffoni,Histaminase activity in rat lung in comparison with intestinal mucosa diamine oxidase. Agents and Actions35, 193–199 (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  11. O. H. Lowry, N. J. Rosebrough, A. L. Farr and R. G. Randall,Protein measurement with the Folin phenol reagent. J. Biol. Chem.193, 265–275 (1951).

    Google Scholar 

  12. G. Spears, J. G. T. Sneyd and E. G. Loten,A method for deriving kinetic constants for two enzymes acting on the same substrate. Biochem. J.125, 1149–1151 (1971).

    Google Scholar 

  13. W. H. Press, B. P. Flannery, S. A. Teukolsky and W. T. Vetterling, Numerical Recipes in C, pp. 542–547, Cambridge Press, Cambridge 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  14. R. J. Murphey and E. W. Gerner,Hypusine formation in protein by a two-step process in cell lysate. J. Biol. Chem.262, 15033–15036 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  15. P. J. A. Davies, A. Chiocca, J. P. Basilion, S. Poddar and J. P. Stein,Transglutaminases and their regulation: Implications for polyamine biosynthesis. Adv. Expt. Biol. Med.250, 391–401 (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  16. V. Z. Gorkin,Qualitative alterations in enzymatic properties of amine oxidases. Adv. Biochem. Psychopharmacol.5, 55–65 (1972).

    Google Scholar 

  17. P. R. Libby,Acetylspermidine deacetylase. Meth. Enzymol.94, 329–331 (1983).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ignesti, G., Banchelli, G., Pirisino, R. et al. Some problems with the diamine oxidase (DAO) assay using putrescine as substrate in rat liver. Agents and Actions 39, 6–12 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01975707

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01975707

Keywords

Navigation