Advertisement

Experientia

, Volume 36, Issue 4, pp 386–387 | Cite as

Biochemical changes in mango after infection withRhizoctonia bataticola

  • H. G. Vyas
  • H. S. Chhatpar
Article

Summary

Rhizoctonia bataticola is responsible for the spoilage of mango fruits (Mangifera india) during post-harvest preservation and storage. Culture ofR. bataticola exhibited significant pectinase and cellulase activity. InRhizoctonia-infected fruits an increase of protease and cellulase activity, and a decrease in certain enzymes of carbohydrate metabolism, were observed in comparison to healthy fruits.

Keywords

Cellulase Cellulase Activity Malate Dehydrogenase Isocitrate Dehydrogenase Acid Proteinase 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Literatur

  1. 1.
    M.B. Assnani, H.S. Chhatpar, M.H. Kadri, A.K. Mattoo and V.V. Modi, J. Food Sci. Tech.8, 208 (1971).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    H.S. Chhatpar, V.V. Modi and V.B. Pandit, Curr. Sci.44, 674 (1975).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    H.S. Chhatpar and V.V. Modi, Phytochemistry13, 165 (1974).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    T.E. Friedemann, Meth. Enzym.3, 414 (1955).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    C.B. Anfinsen, Meth. Enzym.1, 695 (1955).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    S. Ochoa, Meth. Enzym.1, 699 (1955).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    P.S. Ong and M.G. Gaucher, Can. J. Microbiol.19, 129 (1973).CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    G.L. Miller, Analyt. Chem.31, 426 (1958).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    S. Ochoa, Meth. Enzym.1, 735 (1955).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    E.C. Slatter and W.D. Bonner, Biochem. J.52, 185 (1952).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    R.M. McCready and E.A. McComb, Analyt. Chem.24, 1986 (1952).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    J.A. Sibley and A.L. Lehninger, J. biol. Chem.177, 859 (1949).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    R.N. Goodman, Z. Kiraly and M. Zaitlin, in: The Biochemistry and Physiology of Infectious plant diseases, p. 138. Ed. D. Van Nostrand. New York 1967.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    D.N. Srivastava, E. Echandi and J.C. Walker, Phytopathology49, 145 (1959).Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    M.N. Winstead and G.L. McCombs, Phytopathology44, 153 (1961).Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    D.F. Bateman, Phytopathology53, 1178 (1963).Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    D.F. Bateman, Phytopathology54, 1732 (1964).Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    H. Boser, Phytopathology33, 197 (1958).Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    B.A. Friedman, Phytopathology52, 328 (1962).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Birkhäuser Verlag 1980

Authors and Affiliations

  • H. G. Vyas
    • 1
  • H. S. Chhatpar
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Microbiology, Faculty of ScienceM.S. University of BarodaBarodaIndia

Personalised recommendations