Advertisement

Rheologica Acta

, Volume 11, Issue 3–4, pp 323–329 | Cite as

Viscoelastic properties of polymer solutions

II. Measurements of the wall normal stress in slit flow
  • C. D. Han
  • K. U. Kim
Article

Summary

In order to measure the wall normal stresses of viscoelastic solutions, slit dies have been designed. An advantage of using the slit dies, instead of circular tubes, is that pressure transducers can be mounted flush with solid wall, so that “pressure-hole” errors, if any, can be eliminated completely in the measurements of wall normal stresses. Although the geometry of the slit die is different from that of circular tubes, the flow through a thin slit die can, to a good approximation, be considered as one-dimensional by making the aspect ratio of a slot large enough. The slit dies designed for the present study have aspect ratios of 100, 50, 30, and 20. Three pressure transducers were flush-mounted on the long side of the rectangular slot along the longitudinal center line of the die, and measurements of wall normal stresses were made with aqueous solutions of polyacrylamide (ET 597) of various concentrations. Then, exit pressures were determined by extrapolating the straight line portion of the axial pressure distributions to the duct exit. It has been found that the exit pressure increases with solution concentration at a fixed shear rate, and it also increases with shear rate of a given concentration of solution. The exit pressure measurements were then used to completely determine the primary normal stress difference, by using the measurements of axial normal stresses reported in part I of this series.

Keywords

Shear Rate Pressure Transducer Stress Difference Circular Tube Axial Pressure 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1).
    Sakiadis, B. C., Amer. Inst. Chem. Eng. J.8, 317 (1962).Google Scholar
  2. 2).
    White, J. L., Amer. Inst. Chem. Eng. J.9, 559 (1963).Google Scholar
  3. 3).
    Arai, T., paper presented at the Fifth Int'l Congress on Rheology, Kyoto, Japan, October 1968.Google Scholar
  4. 4).
    Mori, Y. andK. Funatsu, Chemistry of High Polymers (Japan)25, 391 (1968).Google Scholar
  5. 5).
    Han, C. D., M. Charles, andW. Philippoff, Trans. Soc. Rheol.13, 455 (1969); ibid.14, 393 (1970).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6).
    Han, C. D., T. C. Yu, andK. U. Kim, J. Appl. Polym. Sci.15, 1149 (1971).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7).
    Han, C. D. andK. U. Kim, Polymer Eng. Sci.11, 395 (1971).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8).
    Han, C. D. andR. R. Lamonte, Polymer Eng. Sci.11, 385 (1971).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9).
    Han, C. D. andK. U. Kim, Rheol. Acta11, 113 (1972).Google Scholar
  10. 10).
    Han, C. D. andK. U. Kim, Trans. Soc. Rheol. (in press).Google Scholar
  11. 11).
    Allen, R. C. andW. R. Schowalter, paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Society of Rheology, Knoxville, Tenn., October 1971.Google Scholar
  12. 12).
    Han, C. D. andL. H. Drexler, Unpublished work.Google Scholar
  13. 13).
    Sylvester, N. D., Ph. D. dissertation (ChE), Carnegie-Mellon Univ., Pittsburgh, Pa. (1968).Google Scholar
  14. 14).
    Shertzer, C. R., Ph. D. dissertation (ChE), Univ. Delaware, Newark, Delaware 1965.Google Scholar
  15. 15).
    Metzner, A. B. W. T. Houghton, R. A. Sailor, andJ. L. White, Trans. Soc. Rheol.5, 137 (1961).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16).
    Shertzer, C. R. andA. B. Metzner, Trans. Plastics Inst., London31, 148 (1963).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Dr. Dietrich Steinkopff Verlag 1972

Authors and Affiliations

  • C. D. Han
    • 1
  • K. U. Kim
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Chemical EngineeringPolytechnic Institute of BrooklynBrooklynUSA

Personalised recommendations