Skip to main content
Log in

Comparison of immunofluorescence microscopy and dilution-plating for the detection of Xanthomonas campestris pv. campestris in crucifer seeds

  • Articles
  • Published:
Netherlands Journal of Plant Pathology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The correlation between immunofluorescence microscopy (IF) and dilution-plating on nutrient starch cycloheximide agar (NSCA) or NSCA with the addition of nitrofurantoin and vancomycin (NSCAA) was studied for the detection ofXanthomonas campestris pv.campestris (Xcc) in crucifer seeds. When checking 50 μl of the seed extract in IF, IF and dilution-plating gave corresponding results (both positive or negative) for 45.4–56.4% of the samples tested. No differences were observed in this respect between tests using a polyclonal antiserum (PCA 94) and replicate tests using monoclonal antibodies (MCA 20H6). When 20 μl of the seed extract was checked in IF, 67.3–71.3% of the samples tested were both positive or negative with dilutionplating and IF. IF negative and dilution-plating positive samples were found for 0.0–7.3% of all samples tested. The percentage of IF positive and dilution-plating negative samples ranged from 26.7–29.2 (20 μl seed extract checked) to 41.8–47.3% (50 μl seed extract checked). Generally, the probability of isolating Xcc increased with increasing numbers of fluorescent cells found in IF. Above 10 000 cells per ml the probability of isolating Xcc ranged from 57.1–81.8%. Increasing the extraction time from 5 min to 2.5 h shaking showed no significant increase of the number of samples found positive in IF and dilution-plating. However, when using both 5 min and 2.5 h shaking as compared to 5 min shaking only, more samples can be found positive in IF (1.0–14.5%) and dilution-plating (3.0–18.5%). Examining 1 μl instead of 50 μl of the sample smear, would increase the correspondence between IF and dilution-plating results up to minimally 69.1% (MCA 20H6). However, the risk of false-negative results in IF as compared to dilution-plating would also increase.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Chang, C. J., Donaldson, D., Crowley, M. & Pinnow, D., 1991. A new semiselective medium for the isolation ofXanthomonas campestris pv.campestris from crucifer seeds. Phytopathology 81: 449–453.

    Google Scholar 

  • Franken, A. A. J. M., 1992. Application of polyclonal and monoclonal antibodies for the detection ofXanthomonas campestris pv.campestris in crucifer seeds using immunofluorescence microscopy. Netherlands Journal of Plant Pathology 98: 95–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Franken, A. A. J. M. & Van Vuurde, J. W. J., 1990. Problems and new approaches in the use of serology for seed-borne bacteria. Seed Science and Technology 18: 415–426.

    Google Scholar 

  • Franken, A. A. J. M., Zilverentant, J. F., Boonekamp, P. M. & Schots, A., 1992. Specificity of polyclonal and monoclonal antibodies for the identification ofXanthomonas campestris pv.campestris. Netherlands Journal of Plant Pathology 98: 81–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Franken, A. A. J. M., Van Zeijl, C., Van Bilsen, J. G. P. M., Neuvel, A., De Vogel, R., Van Wingerden, Y., Birnbaum, Y., Van Hateren, J. & Van der Zouwen, P.S., 1991. Evaluation of a plating assay forXanthomonas campestris pv.campestris. Seed Science and Technology 19: 215–226.

    Google Scholar 

  • Randhawa, P. S. & Schaad, N. W., 1984. Selective isolation ofXanthomonas campestris pv.campetris. Phytopathology 74: 268–272.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaad, N. W., 1982. Detection of bacterial plant pathogens. Plant Disease 66: 885–890.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaad, N. W., 1983a. Detection ofXanthomonas campestris pv.campestris in crucifer seeds. Seed Science and Technology 11: 573–578.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaad, N. W., 1983b. Correlation of laboratory assays for seedborne bacteria with disease development. Seed Science and Technology 11: 877–883.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaad, N. W., 1989. Detection ofXanthomonas campestris pv.campestris in crucifers. In: A. W. Saettler, N. W. Schaad & D. A. Roth (Eds), Detection of Bacteria in Seed and other Planting Material. The American Phytopathological Society, St. Paul, Minnesota, p. 68–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaad, N. W. & Donaldson, R. C., 1980. Comparison of two methods for detection ofXanthomonas campestris in infected crucifer seeds. Seed Science and Technology 8: 383–391.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheppard, J. W., Wright, P. F. & DeSavigny, D. H., 1986. Methods for the evaluation of EIA tests for use in the detection of seed-borne diseases. Seed Science and Technology 14: 49–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siegel, S., 1956. Nonparametric statistics for the behavioral sciences. McGraw-Hill Book Company, Inc., Tokyo, Japan, 312 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Vuurde, J. W. L., Franken, A. A. J. M., Birnbaum, Y. & Jochems, G., 1991. Characteristics of immunofluorescence microscopy and of dilution-plating to detectPseudomonas syringae pv.phaseolicola in bean seed lots and for risk assessment of field incidence of halo blight. Netherlands Journal of Plant Pathology 97: 233–244.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Vuurde, J. W. L., Van den Bovenkamp, G. W. & Birnbaum, Y., 1983. Immunofluorescence microscopy and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay as potential routine tests for the detection ofPseudomonas phaseolicola andXanthomonas phaseoli in bean seeds. Seed Science and Technology 11: 547–559.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Franken, A.A.J.M. Comparison of immunofluorescence microscopy and dilution-plating for the detection of Xanthomonas campestris pv. campestris in crucifer seeds. Netherlands Journal of Plant Pathology 98, 169–178 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01974380

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01974380

Additional keywords

Navigation