Archives of Toxicology

, Volume 67, Issue 4, pp 277–283 | Cite as

Effect of exposure to 2,5-hexanediol in light or darkness on the retina of albino and pigmented rats. I. Morphology

  • Birgitta Bäckström
  • Per Nylén
  • Maud Hagman
  • Ann-Christin Johnson
  • Gunnar Höglund
  • V. Peter Collins
Original Investigations

Abstract

Male albino (Sprague Dawley) and pigmented (Norwegian Brown) rats received 1% 2,5-hexanediol (H) in their drinking water for 5 or 8 weeks, respectively. The rats were housed either in 12 h light (average 30 cd/cm2 inside cage) and 12 h darkness (group LH) or in total darkness (group DH). Two control groups (Light only, LC; Darkness only, DC) were studied in parallel under identical conditions. The animals were sacrificed at the end of H exposure or after an ensuing 13-week period without H but under the same lighting conditions. The retinas of albino rats in the LH group showed a reduction (compared to the LC, DH and DC groups) in the number of nuclei per unit area of the outer nuclear layer (ONL;p<0.05) and degeneration of the outer segment and the inner segment layers (photoreceptor cells). A less pronounced loss of nuclei was seen in the LC group. No decrease in the number of nuclei, or signs of degeneration, were demonstrated in the albino DH or DC groups. Thirteen weeks after exposure to H, the albino LH rats had lost about 50% of the nuclei in the ONL (p<0.05) and the outer plexiform layer (OPL) had almost disappeared. At the corresponding time, in the pigmented rats the LH and DH groups differed from the LC and DC groups. The degenerative process resulted in no inflammatory changes in the retina. The results imply an interaction exceeding simple summation after exposure to light and H, in destroying photoreceptors and OPL (p<0.001) in albino rats. The morphological damage progresses even after the removal of H from the diet. While pigmented rats are susceptible to retinal damage induced by H, they seem to be less sensitive to H together with light, and also develop less severe signs of neurological dysfunction than those seen in albinos after exposure to equivalent doses of H.

Key words

2,5-Hexanediol Light n-Hexane Retinal degenerations Morphometry 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bäckström B, Collins VP (1987) Cytoskeletal changes in axons of rats exposed to 2,5-hexanediol, demonstrated using monoclonal antibodies. Neurotoxicology 8: 85–96PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Bäckström B, Dumanski JP, Collins VP (1990) The effects of 2,5-hexanedione on the retina of albino rats. Neurotoxicology 11: 47–55PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Blain L, Mergler D (1986) La dyschromatopsie chez des personnes exposées professionnellement aux solvants organiques. J Fr Ophtalmol 9: 127–133PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Cavanagh JB (1982a) The pattern of recovery of axons in the nervous system of rats following 2,5-hexanediol intoxication: a question of rheology? Neuropathol Appl Neurobiol 8: 19–34PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Cavanagh JB (1982b) The pathokinetics of acrylamide intoxication: a reassessment of the problem. Neuropathol Appl Neurobiol 8: 315–336PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Cavanagh JB, Bennetts RJ (1981) On the pattern of changes in the rat nervous system produced by 2,5-hexanediol. A topographical study by light microscopy. Brain 104: 297–318PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Chang YC (1990) Patients withn-hexane induced polyneuropathy: a clinical follow up. Br J Ind Med 47: 485–489PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Cody RP, Smith JK (1987) Applied statistics and the SAS programming language, 2nd edn. Elsevier Science Publishing Co. Inc., New YorkGoogle Scholar
  9. Colombi A, Maroni M, Picchi O, Rota E, Castano P, Foa V (1981) Carbon disulfide neuropathy in rats. A morphological and ultrastructural study of degeneration and regeneration. Clin Toxicol 18: 1463–1474PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Eskin TA, Lapham LW, Maurissen JPJ, Merigan WH (1985) Acrylamide effects on the macaque visual system. II. Retinogeniculate morphology. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 26: 317–329PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Eskin TA, Merigan WH, Wood RW (1988) Carbon disulfide effects on the visual system. II. Retinogeniculate degeneration. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 29: 519–527PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Fox DA, Chu LW (1988) Rods are selectively altered by lead: II. Ultrastructure and quantitative histology. Exp Eye Res 46: 613–625PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Jones HB, Cavanagh JB (1982a) Recovery from 2,5-hexanediol intoxication of the retinotectal tract of the rat. An ultrastructural study. Acta Neuropathol 58: 286–290CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Jones HB, Cavanagh JB (1982b) The early evolution of neurofilamentous accumulations due to 2,5-hexanediol in the optic pathways of the rat. Neuropathol Appl Neurobiol 8: 289–301PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Lynch III JJ, Merigan WH, Eskin TA (1989) Subchronic dosing macaques with 2,5-hexanedione causes long-lasting motor dysfunction but reversible visual loss. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 98: 166–180CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Mergler D, Blain L (1987) Assessing color vision loss among solventexposed workers. Am J Ind Med 12: 195–203PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Mergler D, Blain L, Lagacé JP (1987) Solvent related colour vision loss: an indicator of neural damage? Int Arch Occup Environ Health 59: 313–321CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Noell WK, Walker VS, Kang BS, Berman S (1966) Retinal damage by light in rats. Invest Ophthalmol 5: 450–473PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Nylén P, Bäckström B, Hagman M, Johnson A-C, Collins VP, Höglund G (1993) Effect of exposure to 2,5-hexanediol in light or darkness on the retina of albino and pigmented rats. II. Electrophysiological studies. Arch Toxicol (in press)Google Scholar
  20. Pasternak T, Flood DG, Eskin TA, Merigan WH (1985) Selective damage to large cells in the cat retinogeniculate pathway by 2,5-hexanedione. J Neurosci 5: 1641–1652PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Powell HC, Koch T, Garrett R, Lampert PW (1978) Schwann cell abnormalities in 2,5-hexanedione neuropathy. J Neurocytol 7: 517–528CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Raitta C, Seppäläinen AM, Huuskonen MS (1978)n-Hexane maculopathy in industrial workers. Albrecht von Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 209: 99–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Rapp LM, Williams TP (1980) The role of ocular pigmentation in protecting against retinal light damage. Vision Res: 1127–1131Google Scholar
  24. Sheehan DC, Hrapchak BB (1980) Theory and practice of histotechnology, 2nd edn. C. V. Mosby Company, St Louis, Toronto, London, pp 40–58Google Scholar
  25. Spencer PS, Schaumburg HH (1975) Experimental neuropathy produced by 2,5-hexanedione — a major metabolite of the neurotoxic industrial solvent methyl n-butylketone. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 38: 771–775PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Spencer PS, Schaumburg HH, Sabri MI, Veronesi B (1980) The enlarging view of hexacarbon neurotoxicity. CRC Crit Rev Toxicol 7: 279–356Google Scholar
  27. Sperling HG, Johnson C, Harwerth RS (1980) Differential spectral photic damage to primate cones. Vision Res 20: 1117–1125CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Teir H (1988) An ophthalmological study on workers with long-term occupational exposure to industrial solvents. Academic dissertation, Department of Ophthalmology, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, ISBN 952-90028-0-7Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • Birgitta Bäckström
    • 1
  • Per Nylén
    • 2
  • Maud Hagman
    • 2
  • Ann-Christin Johnson
    • 2
  • Gunnar Höglund
    • 2
  • V. Peter Collins
    • 3
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of Occupational ToxicologyNational Institute of Occupational HealthSolnaSweden
  2. 2.Department of NeuromedicineNational Institute of Occupational HealthSolnaSweden
  3. 3.Department of Pathology, Division of NeuropathologyUniversity of Gothenburg, Sahlgrenska HospitalGothenburgSweden
  4. 4.Stockholm Branch, Karolinska InstituteLudwig Institute for Cancer ResearchStockholmSweden

Personalised recommendations