Abstract
The early stages of the interaction between flowers of the cut rose cv. Sonia andBotrytis cinerea was investigated by scanning electron microscopy and light microscopy. Infection of petals by conidial germ tubes evoked a susceptible reaction. In contrast to general findings nutrient addition to the inoculum was not a prerequisite for this phenomenon. At the lower side of germ tube tips the cuticle was penetrated by infection pegs. Already at this early stage of the infection process, the infection sites were macroscopically visible as scattered white spots. After penetration, pegs enlarged to form infection hyphae, which invaded the periclinal wall of outer epidermal cells. At those sites, the petals formed outgrowths of variable appearance at their abaxial side. Thee outgrowths consisted of remanants of collapsed epidermal cells and of infection hyphae. Subsequent intra- and intercellular growth of hyphae led to a collapse of epidermal and mesophyll cells. The symptoms described generally developed within 24 h. After subsequent incubation the lesions became necrotic. Eventually, the necrosis would spread leading to the death of whole petals.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Backhouse, D. & Willetts, H. J., 1987. Development and structure of infection cushions ofBotrytis cinerea. Transactions of the Briths Mycological Society 89: 89–95.
Baker, C. J., Aist, J. R. & Bateman, D.F., 1980. Ultrastructural and biochemical effects of endopectate lyase on cell walls from cell suspension cultures of bean and rice Canadian Journal of Botany 58: 867–880.
Barendse, L., 1986. Hoeveel geld kost pokken? Vakblad voor de Bloemisterij 41 (10): 32–33.
Clark, C. A. & Lorbeer, J. W., 1976. Comparative histopathology ofBotrytis squamosa andB. cinerea on onion leaves. Phytopathology 66: 1279–1289.
Cline, M. N. & Bardsley, C. E., 1984. Postharvest treatment of cut flowers for Botrytis blight. Proceedings of the British Crop Protection Conference on Pests and Diseases 3: 1169–1173.
Elad, Y., 1988. Latent infection ofBotrytis cinerea in rose flowers and combined chemical and physiological control of the disease. Crop Protection 7: 361–366.
Erb, K., Gallegly, M. E. & Leach, J. G., 1973. Longevity of mycelium ofColletrotrichum lindemuthianum in hypocotyl tissue of resistant and susceptible bean cultivars. Phytopathology 63: 1334–1335.
Hammer, P. E. & Marois, J. J., 1989. Nonchemical methods for postharvest control ofBotrytis cinerea on cut roses. Journal of the American Soceety for Horticultural Science 114: 100–106.
Heuvel, J. van den & Waterreus, L. P., 1983. Conidial concentration as an important factor determining the type of prepenetration structures formed byBotrytis cinerea on leaves of French bean (Phaseolus vulgaris). Plant Pathology 32: 263–272.
Jarvis, W. R., 1980. Epidemiology. In: Coley-Smith, J. R., Verhoeff, K. & Jarvis, W. R. (Eds), The biology ofBotrytis. Academic Press London, p. 219–250.
Leeuw, G. T. N. de & Kastelein, P., 1987. Observation of flagellate protozoa (Phytomonas sp.) inCocos nucifera, Cecropia palmata andEuphorbia hirta. Journal of Phytopathology 120: 25–30.
Maiti, I. & Kolattukudy, P. E., 1979. Prevention of fungal infection of plants by specific inhibition of cutinase. Science 205: 507–508.
Mansfield, J. W. & Richardson, A., 1981. The ultrastructure of interactions betweenBotrytis species and broad bean leaves. Physiological Plant Pathology 19: 41–48.
McKeen, W. E., 1974. Mode of penetration of epidermal cell walls ofVicia faba byBotrytis cinerea. Phytopathology 64: 461–467.
Phillips, D. J., Margosan, D. A. & Fouse, D. C., 1985. Postharvest control of Botrytis rot of roses with carbon dioxide. Plant Disease 69: 789–790.
Redmond, J. C., Marois, J. J. & MacDonald, J. D., 1987. Biological control ofBotrytis cinerea on roses with epiphytic microorganisms. Plant Disease 71: 799–802.
Rijkenberg, F. H. J. Leeuw, G. T. N. de & Verhoeff, K., 1980. Light and electron microscopy studies on the infection of tomato fruits byBotyytis cinerea. Canadian Journal of Botany 58: 1394–1404.
Salinas, J., 1990. Protection of gerbera flowers against infection ofBotrytis cinerea with anticutinase monoclonal antibodies. Acta Botanica Neerlandica 39: 313–314 (Abstract).
Salinas, J., Glandorf, D. C. M., Picavet, F. D. & Verhoeff, K., 1989. Effects of temperature, relative humidity and age of conidia on the incidence of spotting on gerbera flowers caused byBotrytis cinerea. Netherlands Journal of Plant Pathology 95; 51–64.
Samson, R. A., Stalpers, J. A. & Verkerke, W., 1979. A simplified technique to prepare fungal specimens for scanning electron microscopy. Cytobios 24: 7–12.
Shirane, N. & Watanabe, Y., 1985. Comparison of infection process ofBotrytis cinerea on cucumber cotyledon and strawberry petal. Annals of the Phytopathological Society of Japan 51: 501–505.
Verhoeff, K., 1970. Spotting of tomato fruits caused byBotrytis cinerea. Netherlands Journal of Plant Pathology 76: 219–226.
Verhoeff, K., 1980. The infection process and host-pathogen interactions. In: Coley-Smith, J. R., Verhoeff, K. & Jarvis, W. R. (Eds), The biology ofBotrytis. Academic Press, London, p. 153–180.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Pie, K., De Leeuw, G.T.N. Histopathology of the initial stages of the interaction between rose flowers and Botrytis cinerea. Netherlands Journal of Plant Pathology 97, 335–344 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01974228
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01974228