Empirical Economics

, Volume 10, Issue 2, pp 65–89 | Cite as

Consumer demand for meat and the evaluation of agricultural policy

  • R. Anderson
  • M. Wilkinson


This study utilizes an econometric model of equilibrium in the U.S. livestock and feedgrain markets to investigate a number of questions of economic methodology and policy. Both nonlinear consumer demand equations that obey the constraints of neoclassical demand theory and a model of supply are used. This approach allows for the measurement of the effects on consumer welfare of actual government policies. In particular, the model is employed to analyze the welfare effects of an actual policy situation — the sale of U.S. grain to the Soviet Union in the third quarter of 1972.


Economic Theory Government Policy Econometric Model Actual Policy Agricultural Policy 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Anderson, R.W.: Some Theory of Inverse Demand for Applied Demand Analysis. European Economic Review14, 1980, 281–290.Google Scholar
  2. Anderson, R.W., andM. Wilkinson: An Evaluation of Alternative Consumer Demand Systems within an Econometric Model of the U.S. Livestock and Feed Grain Markets. In: E.G. Charatsis (ed.): Selected Papers in Contemporary Econometric Problems, Athens, 1982.Google Scholar
  3. -: The Effect on the U.S. Standard of Living of Economic Policy Toward Agriculture. Columbia University, Graduate School of Business, Working Paper No. 416 A, 1981.Google Scholar
  4. Arzac, E., andM. Wilkinson: A Quarterly Econometric Model of U.S. Livestock and Feed Grain Markets and Some of Its Policy Implications. American Journal of Agricultural Economics61, 1979a, 297–308.Google Scholar
  5. —: Stabilization Policies for U.S. Livestock and Feed Grain Markets. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control1, 1979b, 39–58.Google Scholar
  6. Bard, J.: Nonlinear Parameter Estimation. IBM Contributed Program Library, 1967.Google Scholar
  7. Barten, A.: Maximum Likelihood Estimation of a Conplete System of Demand Equations. European Economic Review1, 1969, 7–73.Google Scholar
  8. —: The Systems of Consumer Demand Functions Approach: A Review. Econometrica45, 1977, 23–52.Google Scholar
  9. Berndt, E.R., andN.E. Savin: Estimation and Hypothesis Testing in Singular Equation Systems with Autoregressive Disturbances. Econometrica43, 1975, 937–958.Google Scholar
  10. Berndt, E.R., M.H. Darrough, andW.E. Diewert: Flexible Forms and Expenditure Distributions: An Application to Canadian Consumer Demand Functions. International Economic Review18, 1977, 651–675.Google Scholar
  11. Blackorby, C., D. Primont, andR.R. Russell: Duality, Separability and Functional Structure: Theory and Applications. North-Holland, 1978.Google Scholar
  12. Christensen, L.R., D.W. Jorgenson, andL. Lau: Transcendental Logarithmic Utility Functions. American Economic Review65, 1975, 367–383.Google Scholar
  13. Christensen, L.R., andM.E. Manser: Estimating U.S. Consumer Preferences for Meat with a Flexible Utility Function. Journal of Econometrics5, 1977, 37–53.Google Scholar
  14. Deaton, A.: A Reconsideration of the Empirical Implications of Additive Preferences. Economic Journal84, 1974, 338–348.Google Scholar
  15. —: The Distance Function in Consumer Behavior with Applications to Index Numbers and Optimal Taxation. Review of Economic Studies46, 1979, 391–406.Google Scholar
  16. Fisher, M.: Dynamic Structure and Estimation in Economy-Wide Econometric Model. In: J.S. Duesenberry, G. Fromm, L.R. Klein, and E. Kuh: The Brookings Quarterly Econometric Model of the United States, Rand McNally and Co, 1965.Google Scholar
  17. Gorman, W.M.: Tricks with Utility Functions. In: Artis and Nobay (eds.), Essays in Economic Analysis. Cambridge University Press, 1976.Google Scholar
  18. Heien, D.: Price Determination Processes for Agricultural Sector Models. American Journal of Agricultural Economics59, 1977, 126–132.Google Scholar
  19. Hotelling, H.: The General Welfare in Relation to Problems of Taxation and of Railway and Utility Rates. Econometrica6, 1938, 242–269.Google Scholar
  20. Houthakker, H.S.: Additive Preferences. Econometrica28, 1960, 244–257.Google Scholar
  21. Marshall, H.: Principles of Economics. 8th Edition. Macmillan, 1938.Google Scholar
  22. Pollak, R., andR. Wales: Estimation of Complete Demand Systems from Household Budget Data: The Linear and Quadratic Expenditure Systems. American Economic Review68, 1978, 348–359.Google Scholar
  23. Tomek, W.G., andR.W. Gray: Temporal Relationships among Prices on Commodity Futures Markets: Their Allocative and Stabilzing Roles. American Journal of Agricultural Economics52, 1970, 372–380.Google Scholar
  24. Working, H.: The Theory of the Price of Storage. American Economic Review39, 1949, 1254–1262.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Physica-Verlag 1985

Authors and Affiliations

  • R. Anderson
    • 1
  • M. Wilkinson
    • 2
  1. 1.Graduate CenterCity University of New YorkUSA
  2. 2.Graduate School of BusinessColumbia UniversityNew YorkUSA

Personalised recommendations