Insider-outsider influences on industry wages
- 85 Downloads
The persistence of high rates of unemployment in Europe has focused renewed attention on the wage determination process. One aspect which has received particular attention recently is the extent to which wages are determined by insiders, with outsiders having little impact on the wage bargain. If outsiders are disenfranchised in the wage determination process, they may be unable to underbid themselves into employment. The insider-outsider model, and the associated implication of hysteresis, thus provides a possible explanation for persistent involuntary un-employment.
Most empirical work on the importance of the insider-outsider model and hysteresis has been done at the aggregate level, either by testing whether wage growth is related to the level or the change in unemployment, or by testing if employment or unemployment follows a random walk. This paper extends both of these lines of analysis to the industry level. Based on a specification which nests alternative models of the wage determination process, estimation results are presented for fifteen industries using annual data for fourteen industrialized countries, and for pooled time-series cross-country data. The paper also tests the hypothesis that only industry-specific variables are important to the determination of industry wages and considers whether differences in industry wage determination might help to understand cross-country differences in unemployment.
The results offer considerable support to the insider view of wage determination. Industries in which wages seem to be determined by a natural rate/Phillips curve model — the primary competing model considered in the paper — appear to be the exception rather than the rule. Moreover, at the industry level hysteresis does not appear to characterise wage formation in the high-unemployment European countries to a greater extent than in North America and Japan.
KeywordsRandom Walk Aggregate Level Curve Model Industry Level Wage Growth
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Blanchard O (1988) “Unemployment: Getting the Questions Right — and Some of the Answers”, NBER Working Paper No. 2698 (September)Google Scholar
- Blanchard O, Summers L H (1988) “Hysteresis and the European Unemployment Problem”, in Cross (1988), pp. 306–64 and in S. Fischer, ed., NBER Macroeconomics Annual, 1986, MIT Press, pp. 65–71Google Scholar
- Blanchflower D G, Oswald A J, Garrett M D (1987) “Insider Power in Wage Determination: Part II”, mimeo (June)Google Scholar
- Burda M, Sachs J (1987) “Institutional Aspects of High Unemployment in the Federal Republic of Germany”, NBER Working Paper No. 2241 (May)Google Scholar
- Coe D T (1988) “Hysteresis Effects in Aggregate Wage Equations”, in Cross, ed. (1988), pp. 284–305Google Scholar
- Chan-Lee J H, Coe D T, Prywes M (1987) “Microeconomic Changes and Macroeconomic Wage Disinflation in the 1980s”, (OECD Economic Studies (Spring), pp. 121–57Google Scholar
- Cross R ed (1988) Unemployment, Hysteresis & the Natural Rate Hypothesis, Oxford: Basil BlackwellGoogle Scholar
- Friedman M (1968) “The Role of Monetary Policy”, American Economic Review (March), pp. 1–17Google Scholar
- Gordon R J (1988) “Back to the Future: European Unemployment Today Viewed from America in 1939”, Brookings Papers on Economic Activity (No. 1), pp. 271–312Google Scholar
- Hendry D F (1986) “Econometric Modelling with Cointegrated Variables: An Overview”, Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics (No. 3), pp. 201–12Google Scholar
- Katz L (1986) “Efficiency Wage Theories: A Partial Evaluation”, NBER Working Paper No. 1906 (April)Google Scholar
- Kuh E (1967) “A Productivity Theory of Wage Levels — An Alternative to the Phillips Curve”, Review of Economic Studies, pp. 333–60Google Scholar
- Lindbeck A, Snower D J (1986a) “Wage Setting, Unemployment, and Insider-Outsider Relations”, American Economic Review (May), pp. 235–9Google Scholar
- Lindbeck A, Snower D J (1986b) “Efficiency Wages versus Insiders and Outsiders”, European Economic Review Proceedings, pp. 407–16Google Scholar
- Lindbeck A, Snower D J (1988a) “Cooperation, Harassment, and Involuntary Unemployment: An Insider-Outsider Approach”, American Economic Review (March), pp. 167–88Google Scholar
- Lindbeck A, Snower D J (1988b) “Long-Term Unemployment and Macroeconomic Policy”, American Economic Review (May), pp. 38–49Google Scholar
- Meyer-zu-Schlochtern F J M (1988) “An International Sectoral Database for Thirteen OECD Countries”, OECD ESD Working Papers No. 57 (November)Google Scholar
- Milbourne R D, Purvis D D, Scoones W D (1989), “Unemployment Insurance and Unemployment Dynamics”, Institute for Economic Research Discussion Paper No. 750, Queen's University (June)Google Scholar
- Nickell S (1988) “The Supply Side and Macroeconomic Modeling”, in R. Bryant, et al., ed., Empirical Macroeconomics for Interdependent Economies, Brookings InstitutionGoogle Scholar
- Nickell S, Kong P (1988) “An Investigation into the Power of Insiders in Wage Determination”, Oxford Applied Economics Discussion Paper No. 49 (June)Google Scholar
- Nickell S, Wadhwani S (1988) “Insider Forces and Wage Determination”, Institute of Economics and Statistics, University of Oxford, mimeo (March)Google Scholar
- Salop S (1979) “A Model of the Natural Rate of Unemployment”, American Economic Review (March), pp. 117–25Google Scholar
- Sargan J D (1964) “Wages and Prices in the United Kingdom: A Study in Econometric Methodology”, in P.E. Hart, et al., ed., Econometric Analysis for National Economic Planning, London: ButterworthsGoogle Scholar
- Sargan J D, Bhargava (1983) “Testing residuals from Least Squares Regression for being Generated by the Gaussian Random Walk”, Econometrica (January), pp. 153–74Google Scholar
- Snower D J (1988) “European Unemployment: The Insider-Outsider Explanation and its Policy Implications”, CEPR Bulletin (June), pp. 3–7Google Scholar
- Solow R (1985) “Insiders and Outsiders in Wage Determination”, Scandinavian Journal of Economics (No. 2)Google Scholar