Did the cost of living in Canada increase faster for the rich during the period 1950–1980?
- 31 Downloads
The paper computes the approximate true cost of living indexes from the time series data on price and quantity of nine broadly defined goods and services to show that the cost of living increased faster for the rich in Canada during the three decades. This is due mainly to an increase in the prices of “luxury” goods and services relative to “necessity” goods and services. These conclusions are almost identical to those of several other studies which utilize a different framework and a different time period for analysis.
KeywordsTime Series Economic Theory Series Data Time Series Data True Cost
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Balk BM (1986b) A simple method for calculating cost-of-living index numbers with the help of a differential demand system. Paper presented at The European Meeting of the Econometric Society, Budapest, Hungary, Sept. 1 to 5, 1986Google Scholar
- Caves DW, Christensen LR, Diewert EW (1982) The economic theory of index numbers and the measurement of input, output, and productivity. Econometrica 50:1393–1414Google Scholar
- Diewert WE (1983) The theory of the cost of living index and the measurement of welfare change. Discussion Paper No. 83-05, Department of Economics, University of British Columbia, Feb. 1983Google Scholar
- Johnson SR, Hassan ZA, Green RD (1984) Demand systems estimation: methods and applications. The Iowa State University Press, AmesGoogle Scholar
- Raj B (1986) Consumption data for nine goods and Divisia moments of consumption for Canada, 1950–1980. McKethan-Matherly Eminent Chair Discussion Paper MM 19Google Scholar
- Theil H (1976) Theory and measurement of consumer demand, vol 2. North Holland, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
- Weir JA (1978) Inflation and unemployment. In: Yelaja SA (ed) Canadian social policy. Wilfrid Laurier University Press, Waterloo, pp 27–48Google Scholar
- Working H (1943) Statistical laws of family expenditure. Journal of the American Statistical Association 38:43–56Google Scholar