Agents and Actions

, Volume 2, Issue 3, pp 103–117 | Cite as

Facilitated habituation: Strychnine dose-response effects on neural and behavioral habituation

  • Diane K. Andry
  • Marvin W. Luttges
Research Reports


The effects of two doses of strychnine sulfate (0.125 mg/kg and 0.500 mg/kg) on mouse neural and behavioral habituation were assessed. Reliable alterations in concurrent neural (spontaneous and evoked) activity and spontaneous behavioral activity were obtained as the result of training.

Neural habituation was characterized by higher frequency, lower amplitude EEG activity, reduced hippocampal theta activity, increased amplitudes in early components of visual evoked responses, and transient increases followed by progressive decreases of late component amplitudes of the visual evoked responses. Behavioral habituation appeared as decreased gross activity and changes in mouse orientation to cogent features of the test chamber.

Low strychnine doses (0.125 mg/kg) reliably facilitated habituation to light flashes and produced lessened sensitivity to dishabituation stimuli. High strychnine doses (0.500 mg/kg) disrupted habituation and produced heightened sensitivity to dishabituation stimuli.

The results were accommodated by a modified dualprocess theory of habituation; single process views of habituation were inadequate. The significance of these results to drug facilitation was discussed in terms of optimal arousal and the mediation of pro- and retroactive influences on learning. The characterization of processes underlying memory storage seems amenable to further clarification using CNS stimulants known to operate on such processes.


Theta Activity Strychnine Light Flash Dualprocess Theory Process View 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. [1]
    W. R. Adey,Studies of Hippocampal Electrical Activity During Approach Learning, in:Brain Mechanisms and Learning (Eds. A. Fessard, R.W. Gerard and J. Konorski; Blackwell, Oxford 1961), p. 577–588.Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    A. Arduini andM. G. Arduini,Effect of Drugs and Metabolic Alterations on Brain Stem Arousal Mechanism, J. Pharmac. exp. Ther.110, 76–85 (1954).Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    M. A. B. Brazier,The Electrical Activity of the Nervous System (MacMillan, New York 1958), p. 186–192.Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    R. A. Breen andJ. L. McGaugh,Facilitation of Maze Learning with Posttrail Injections of Picrotoxin, J. comp. physiol. Psychol.54, 498–501 (1961).Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    W. H. Calhoun,Effect of Level of External Stimulation on Rate of Learning and Interaction of this Effect with Strychnine Treatment in Mice, Psychol. Rep.18, 715–722 (1966).Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    M. Demetrescu, M. Demetrescu andG. Iosif,The Tonic Control of Cortical Responsiveness by Inhibitory and Facilitatory Diffuse Influences, Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol.18, 1–24 (1965).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    A. Forbes andB. R. Morison,Cortical Response to Sensory Stimulation under Deep Barbiturate Narcosis, J. Neurophysiol.2, 112–128 (1939).Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    J. D. French, M. Verzeano andH. W. Magoun,A Neural Basis for the Anesthetic State, Arch. Neurol. Psychiat.69, 519–529 (1953).Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    J. Garcia, N. A. Buckwald, G. Bach-y-Rita, B. H. Feder andR. A. Koelting,Electroencephalographic Responses to Ionizing Radiation, Science140, 289–290 (1963).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    E. Gellhorn, H. M. Ballin andM. Kawakami,Studies on Experimental Convulsions with Emphasis on the Role of the Hypothalamus and Reticular Formation, Epilepsia1, 233–254 (1960).Google Scholar
  11. [11]
    M. Glanzer,Stimulus Satiation: An Explanation of Spontaneous Alteration and Related Phenomena, Psychol. Rev.60, 257–268 (1953).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. [12]
    E. Grastyán, G. Karmos, L. Vereczkey andL. Kellenyi,The Hippocampal Electrical Correlates of the Homeostatic Regulation of Motivation, Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol.21, 34–53 (1966).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. [13]
    P. M. Groves andR. F. Thompson,Habituation: A Dual-Process Theory, Psychol. Rev.77, 419–450 (1970).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. [14]
    M. Haider, R. Spong andD. B. Lindsley,Attention, Vigilance and Cortical Evoked Potentials in Humans, Science145, 180–182 (1964).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. [15]
    R. Hernandez-Peón,Neurophysiological Correlates of Habituation and Other Manifestations of Plastic Inhibition (Internal Inhibition), Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol., Supplement 13, p. 101–114 (1960).Google Scholar
  16. [16]
    G. Horn,Electrical Activity of the Cerebral Cortex of the Unanesthetized Cat During Attentive Behavior, Brain83, 57–76 (1960).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. [17]
    H. H. Jasper,Interpretation of the Effect of Gamma-Aminobutyric Acid on Cortical Electrical Activity, Evoked Potentials and Effects of Strychnine and Picrotoxin, in:Inhibition in the Nervous System and Gamma-Aminobutyric Acid (Ed. E. Roberts; Pergamon Press, New York), p. 544–553.Google Scholar
  18. [18]
    E. R. John,Mechanisms of Memory (Academic Press, New York 1967), p. 253–254.Google Scholar
  19. [19]
    E. E. King,Differential Actions of Anesthetics and Interneuron Depressants upon EEG Arousal and Recruitment Responses, J. Pharmac. exp. Ther.116, 16–43 (1956).Google Scholar
  20. [20]
    G. Krauthamer andD. Albe-Fessard,Inhibition of Nonspecific Sensory Activities Following Striopallidal and Capsular Stimulation, J. Neurophysiol.28, 100–124 (1965).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. [21]
    J. Krivanek andJ. L. McGaugh,Effects of Pentyl-enetetrazol on Memory Storage in Mice, Psychopharmacologia12, 303–321 (1968).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. [22]
    J. Krivanek andJ. L. McGaugh,Facilitating Effects of Pre- and Posttrial Amphetamine Administration on Discrimination Learning in Mice, Agents and Actions1, 36–42 (1969).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. [23]
    P. W. Landfield andJ. L. McGaugh,EEG Correlates of Memory Consolidation (reported at W.P.A. Conference, San Francisco, April 1971).Google Scholar
  24. [24]
    R. N. Leaton,Exploratory Behavior in Rats with Hippocampal Lesions, J. comp. physiol. Psychol.59, 325–330 (1965).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. [25]
    D. B. Lindsley,Average Evoked Potentials —Achievements, Failures and Prospects, in:Average Evoked Potentials: Methods, Results, and Evaluations (Eds. E. Donchin and D. B. Lindsley; National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Washington, D. C. 1969), p. 31–38.Google Scholar
  26. [26]
    K. Lissák andE. Grastyán,The Changes in Hippocampal Electrical Activity During Conditioning, Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol., Supplement 13, p. 271–279 (1960).Google Scholar
  27. [27]
    M. W. Luttges,Electrophysiological Dose-Response Effects of Megimide and Strychnine, unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, University of California (Irvine 1968).Google Scholar
  28. [28]
    M. W. Luttges andR. I. Gamow,Garter Snakes: Studies of Spontaneous and Evoked Brain Responses with Electroencephalography, Comm. Beh. Biol.5, 115–130 (1970).Google Scholar
  29. [29]
    M. W. Luttges andJ. L. McGaugh,Facilitating Effects of Bemegride on Retention of a Visual Discrimination Task, Agents and Actions1, 234–239 (1970).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. [30]
    D. M. MacKay,Evoked Brain Potentials as Indicators of Sensory Information Processing, in:Neurosciences Research Symposium Summaries, Vol. 4 (Eds. R. O. Schmitt, T. Melnechuck, G. C. Quarton and G. Adelman; M.I.T., Cambridge 1970), p.444–460.Google Scholar
  31. [31]
    J. L. McGaugh,Facilitative and Disruptive Effects of Strychnine Sulfate on Maze Learning, Psychol. Rep.8, 99–104 (1961).Google Scholar
  32. [32]
    J. L. McGaugh,Time-Dependent Processes in Memory Storage, Science153, 1351–1358 (1966).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. [33]
    J. L. McGaugh andJ. Krivanek,Strychnine Effects on Discrimination Learning in Mice: Effects of Dose and Time of Administration, Physiol. Beh.5, 798–803 (1970).Google Scholar
  34. [34]
    J. L. McGaugh andL. F. Petrinovich,Effects of Drugs on Learning and Memory, Int. Rev. Neurobiol.8, 139–196 (1965).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. [35]
    J. L. McGaugh, C. W. Thompson, W. H. Westbrook andW. J. Hudspeth,A Further Study of Learning Facilitation with Strychnine Sulfate, Psychopharmacologia3, 352–360 (1962).Google Scholar
  36. [36]
    J. T. Marsh, D. A. McCarthy, G. Sheatz andR. Galambos,Amplitude Changes in Evoked Auditory Potentials During Habituation and Conditioning, Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol.13, 224–234 (1961).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. [37]
    O. O. Pylkko andD. M. Woodbury,Seizure Development in Rats, J. Pharmac. exp. Therap.131, 185–190 (1961).Google Scholar
  38. [38]
    A. I. Roitbak,Electrical Phenomena in the Cerebral Cortex During the Extinction of Orientation and Conditioned Reflexes, Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol., Supplement 13, p. 91–100 (1960).Google Scholar
  39. [39]
    A. Routtenberg,Hippocampal Correlates of Consummatory and Observed Behavior, Physiol. Beh.3, 533–535 (1968).Google Scholar
  40. [40]
    S. Siegel,Nonparametric Statistics (McGraw-Hill, New York 1956).Google Scholar
  41. [41]
    E. N. Sokolov,The Orienting Reflex, Its Structure and Mechanisms, in:Orienting Reflex and Exploratory Behavior (Eds. L. G. Voronin, A. N. Neontiev, A. R. Luria, E. N. Sokolov and O. S. Vinogradova; Academy of Pedagogical Sciences, Moscow 1958), p. 141–151.Google Scholar
  42. [42]
    P. Spong, M. Haider andD. B. Lindsley,Selective Attentiveness and Cortical Evoked Responses to Visual and Auditory Stimuli, Science148, 395–397 (1965).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. [43]
    L. Stein,Habit and Stimulus Novelty: A Model Based on Classical Conditioning, Psychol. Rev.73, 352–356 (1966).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. [44]
    V. M. Storozhuk andN. I. Perfil'eva,Activity of Neurons of Somatosensory Cortex During Local Strychnine Poisoning, Neuroscience Translations1, 327–335 (1968).Google Scholar
  45. [45]
    L. O. Stratton andL. Petrinovich,Posttrial Injections of an Anticholinesterase Drug on Maze Learning in Two Strains of Rats, Psychopharmacologia5, 47–54 (1963).Google Scholar
  46. [46]
    R. F. Thompson, D. Benney andH. Smith,Cortical Control of Specific and Nonspecific Sensory Projections to the Cerebral Cortex, Psychon. Sci.4, 93–94 (1966).Google Scholar
  47. [47]
    R. F. Thompson, andJ. A. Shaw,Behavioral Correlates of Evoked Activity Recorded from Association Areas of the Cerebral Cortex, J. comp. physiol. Psychol.60, 329–339 (1965).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. [48]
    R. F. Thompson andW. A. Spencer,Habituation: A Model Phenomenon for the Study of Neuronal Substrates of Behavior, Psychol. Rev.73, 16–43 (1966).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. [49]
    D. J. Zerbolio,Within-Strain Faciliation and Disruption of Avoidance Learning by Picrotoxin, Psychon. Sci.9, 411–412 (1967).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Birkhüuser-Verlag 1971

Authors and Affiliations

  • Diane K. Andry
    • 1
    • 2
  • Marvin W. Luttges
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversity of ColoradoBoulder
  2. 2.Aerospace Engineering SciencesUniversity of ColoradoBoulder

Personalised recommendations