Agents and Actions

, Volume 3, Issue 3, pp 148–156 | Cite as

Comparison of the14C-putrescine assay with the NADH test for the determination of diamine oxidase: Description of a standard procedure with a high precision and an improved accuracy

  • J. Kusche
  • H. Richter
  • R. Hesterberg
  • J. Schmidt
  • W. Lorenz
Selected Papers

Abstract

A standard procedure for the determination of the diamine oxidase (DAO) activity is described as a modification of the method ofOkuyama andKobyashi [2]. The principle of this method is the assay of14C-Δ1-pyrroline and its polymers formed by the oxydative deamination of14C-putrescine in the presence of DAO. This assay was shown to possess a high sensitivity and precision. Now its accuracy could be enhanced by the comparison with the NADH test for DAO activity. This kind of a reference method made the direct correlation between cpm/min and deamination rates possible. Thus International Units (mU/sample) could be introduced into the isotope assay: In our test system 1 mU corresponded to 215 cpm/min, this value depending on the specific radioactivity of the substrate solution.

The DAO activity from dog's small intestine was investigated with these two methods. The pH-optimum for this enzyme was 7.6, the K m for putrescine as substrate 1×10−4M, the optimum substrate concentration was 1×10−3M. In the small intestine of dogs and rabbits the DAO activity increased from proximal to distal parts, but in human beings the distribution of the enzyme in the gut did not show such a characteristic gradient.

In the discussion, the advantages and disadvantages of the two tests for the determination of DAO activity were compared with each other. The isotope assay was the more sensitive and convenient test. But due to its absolute specificity the NADH test was useful as a reference method and for the investigation of the substrate specificity of the DAO in various tissues and body fluids.

Keywords

Small Intestine NADH Diamine Substrate Concentration Distal Part 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    E. A. Zeller,Über den enzymatischen Abbau von Histamin und Diaminen, 2. Mitteilung, Helv. chim. Acta21, 880 (1938).Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    T. Okuyama andY. Kobayashi,Determination of Diamine Oxidase by Liquid Scintillation Counting, Arch. Biochem. Biophys.95, 242 (1961).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    R. Richterich,Klinische Chemie, 2. ed. (Akad. Verlagsges. Frankfurt 1961), p. 47.Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    Report of the Commission on Enzymes of the IUB, Symposium Series 20 (Pergamon Press London, New York, Oxford, Paris 1961).Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    W. Lorenz, J. Kusche andE. Werle,Über eine neue Methode zur Bestimmung der Diaminoxidase-Aktivität, Hoppe-Seyler's Z. physiol. Chemie348, 561 (1967).Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    W. Lorenz, J. Kusche, H. Hahn andE. Werle,Determination of Activity of Diamine Oxidase, Urease and Histidine Ammonia-Lyase by Enzymatic Assay of Ammonia, Z. Anal. Chem.243, 259 (1968).Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    W. Lorenz, J. Kusche andE. Werle,Diaminoxidase, Methoden der enzymatischen Analyse, 2. ed. (Ed. H. U. Bergmeyer; Verlag Chemie 1970), p. 630.Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    J. Kusche, U. v. Trotha, G. Mühlberger andW. Lorenz,Diamine Oxidase in Human Serum during Pregnancy: Quality Control with Two Substrates and with Native and Lyophilized Mixed Serum, The Transactions of the 5th International Symposium on Quality Control (1973), in press.Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    E. Kirsten, C. Gerez andR. Kirsten,Eine enzymatische Mikrobestimmung des Ammoniaks, geeignet für Extrakte tierischer Gewebe und Flüssigkeiten, Biochem. Z.337, 312 (1963).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    H. J. Strecker,L-Glutamic Dehydrogenase from Liver, in:Methods in Enzymology II (Eds S. P. O. Colowick and N. O. Kaplan; Academic Press, New York 1955), p. 220.Google Scholar
  11. [11]
    H. U. Bergmeyer,Methoden der enzymatischen Analyse, 2. ed. (Verlag Chemie 1970).Google Scholar
  12. [12]
    G. W. Snedecor andW. G. Cochran,Statistical Methods (Iowa State University Press, Ames Iowa 1968).Google Scholar
  13. [13]
    F. Buffoni andH. Blaschko,Benzylamine Oxidase and Histaminase: Purification and Crystallization of an Enzyme from Pig Plasma, Proc. Roy. Soc.161, 153 (1964).Google Scholar
  14. [14]
    R. Hansson,Diamine Oxidase Isoenzymes in Human Blood Plasma, Scand. J. Clin. Lab. Invest.25, 33 (1970).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. [15]
    J. Kusche, H. Richter, J. Schmidt, R. Hesterberg, Ch. Specht andW. Lorenz,Intestinal Diamine Oxidase: Isolation, Substrate Specificity and Pathophysiological Significance, Agents and Actions (this issue).Google Scholar
  16. [16]
    G. Tufvesson andN. Tryding,Determination of Diamine Oxidase Activity in Normal Human Blood serum, Scand. J. Clin. Lab. Invest.24, 2 (1969).Google Scholar
  17. [17]
    J. A. H. Gooszen,The Use of Control Charts in the Clinical Laboratory, Clin. Chim. Acta5, 431 (1960).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. [18]
    A. S. Benenson, H. L. Tompson andM. R. Klugermann,Application of Laboratory Controls in Clinical Chemistry, Am. J. Clin. Path.25, 575 (1955).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. [19]
    R. J. Henry,Use of the Control Chart in Clinical Chemistry, Clin. Chem.5, 309 (1959).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. [20]
    D. B. Tonks,A Dual Program of Quality Control for Clinical Chemistry Laboratories, with a Discussion of Allowable Limits of Error, Z. Anal. Chem.243, 760 (1968).Google Scholar
  21. [21]
    K. S. Kim, B. Backus, M. Harris andP. Rourke,Distribution of Diamine Oxidase and Imidazole-N-Methyltransferase along the Gastrointestinal Tract, Comp. Biochem. Physiol.31, 137 (1969).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. [22]
    A. L. Southren andA. B. Weingold,Method for Measuring Plasma Diamine Oxidase, Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol.106, 1246 (1970).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. [23]
    N. Tryding,Micromethod for Determination of Plasma Diamine Oxidase, Obstet. Gynecol.2, 18 (1964).Google Scholar
  24. [24]
    R. Resnik andR. J. Levine,Plasma Diamine Oxidase Activity in Pregnancy: A Reappraisal, Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol.104, 1061 (1969).PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Birkhäuser-Verlag 1973

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. Kusche
    • 1
  • H. Richter
    • 1
  • R. Hesterberg
    • 1
  • J. Schmidt
    • 1
  • W. Lorenz
    • 1
  1. 1.Division of Experimental Surgery and Pathological Biochemistry at the Surgery Clinic of UniversityMarburg an der LahnGermany

Personalised recommendations