Advertisement

The evolution of sustainability

  • Charles V. Kidd
Article

Abstract

Six separate but related strains of thought have emerged prominently since 1950 in discussions of such phenomena as the interrelationships among rates of population growth, resource use, and pressure on the environment. They are the ecological/carrying capacity root, the resources/environment root, the biosphere root, the critique of technology root, the “no growth”/“slow growth” root, and the ecodevelopment root.

Each of these strains of thought was fully developed before the word “sustainable” itself was used. Many of the roots are based on fundamentally opposing assessments of the future of mankind. Many of the roots, such as the ecology/carrying capacity root, are based on physical concepts, and they exclude normative values. Others, such as the ecodevelopment root, include such values as equity, broad participation in governance, and decentralized government.

When the word “sustainability” was first used in 1972 in the context of man's future, in a British book,Blueprint for Survival, normative concepts were prominent. This continued to be the case when the word was first used in 1974 in the United States to justify a “no growth” economy.

“Sustainability” was first used in a United Nations document in 1978. Normative concepts, encapsulated in the term “ecodevelopment,” were prominent in the United Nations publications.

After about 1978, the term “sustainability” began to be used not only in technological articles and reports but also in policy documents culminating in the use of the term in the report of the summit meeting of the Group of Seven in 1989.

The roots of the term “sustainability” are so deeply embedded in fundamentally different concepts, each of which has valid claims to validity, that a search for a single definition seems futile. The existence of multiple meaning is tolerable if each analyst describes clearly what he means by sustainability.

Keywords

sustainability environment ecology development resources carrying capacity eco development 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ashby, E. 1978.Reconciling man with the Environment. Stanford, CT: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Boulding, K. 1966. “The Economics of the Coming Spaceship Earth”.Environmental quality in a growing economy. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Brown, B.J. et al. 1987. “Global Sustainability: Towards Definition”.Environmental Management. 2: no. 6.Google Scholar
  4. Brown, H. 1954.The challenge of man's future. New York, NY: Viking Press.Google Scholar
  5. Brown, L.R. 1981.Building a sustainable society. New York, NY: W.W. Norton.Google Scholar
  6. — (ed). 1984.State of the world. 1984. New York, NY: W.W. Norton. (Annual volumes through 1989.)Google Scholar
  7. Burton, I. and R. Kates. “Slaying the Malthusian Dragon,”Ecomonic Geography 40(1): 82–89.Google Scholar
  8. Carson, R. 1962.The silent spring. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin & Company.Google Scholar
  9. Clark, W.C. and R.E. Munn. 1986.Sustainable development of the biosphere. Published on behalf of the International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis by Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Cleveland, H. 1979.The management of sustainable growth. Houston, TX: The Woodlands Conferences.Google Scholar
  11. Cole, M.S.D., S. Freeman, M. Jahoda, and K.L.B. Pavitt (eds.) 1973.Models of doom. A critique of the limits to growth. New York, NY: Universe Books.Google Scholar
  12. Council on Environmental Quality. 1977.The global 2000 report to the President. Volume one. Entering the twenty-first century. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  13. —. 1977.The global 2000 report to the President. Volume two. The technical report. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  14. Dahlberg, K. 1987. “Genetic Diversity and Agrodevelopment,”Conservation Biology 1: May.Google Scholar
  15. Daly, H. 1973.Toward a steady state economy. New York, NY: W.H. Freeman & Co.Google Scholar
  16. —. 1973.Steady state economics — The economics of biophysical equilibrium and moral growth. New York, NY: W.H. Freeman & Co.Google Scholar
  17. Douglas, D. 1984.Agricultural sustainability in a changing world order. New York, NY: W.H. Freeman & Co.Google Scholar
  18. Farrar, M.T. and J.P. Milton. (eds.).The careless technology. Garden City, NJ: The Natural History Press.Google Scholar
  19. Forrester, J. 1971.World dynamics. Boston, MA: Wright Allen Press.Google Scholar
  20. Georgesau-Roegen, N. 1971.The entropy law and the economic process. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Goldsmith, E. et al.Blueprint for survival. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin Co.Google Scholar
  22. Lovins, H. 1977.Soft energy paths. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger Press.Google Scholar
  23. Hollinger, C.S. 1973. “Resilience and Stability of Ecological Systems,”Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics. Vol. 4.Google Scholar
  24. Marsh, G.P. 1864.Man and nature, or physical geography as modified by human action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Meadows, D.M., D.L. Meadows, J. Randers, and W. Behrens. 1972.The limits to growth. New York, NY: Universe Books.Google Scholar
  26. Meadows, D.L. 1977.Alternatives to growth. I. A. search for a sustainable future. Boston, MA: Ballinger Publishing Co.Google Scholar
  27. Mill, J.S. 1857.Principles of political economy. Vol. III. London: Reprinted by Penguin Classics, 1987.Google Scholar
  28. Meyer, N. 1987.Not far afield. U.S. Interests and the global environment. Washington, DC: World Resources Institute.Google Scholar
  29. Nash, R. 1968.The American environment: Readings in the history of conservation. Reading, MA: Addison, Wesley.Google Scholar
  30. National Research Council Board on Science and Technology for Development (BOSTID).Sustainable agriculture. Comments by a BOSTID Panel for the AID Research advisory Committee Meeting. January 14–15. Washington, DC: National Research Council.Google Scholar
  31. Osborne, F. 1948.Our plundered planet. New York, NY: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
  32. Pirages, D.C. and P.R. Ehrlich. 1973.Ark II.New York, NY:W.H. Freeman Co.Google Scholar
  33. —.1977.The sustainable society. New York, NY: Praeger Press.Google Scholar
  34. Turner, R.K. 1988.Sustainable environmental development. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  35. Weinberg, A. 1984. “Book Review of the Resourceful Earth,”Environment Vol. 26, No. 7.Google Scholar
  36. Wenner Gren Foundation. 1956.Man's role in changing the face of the earth. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  37. World Bank. 1987.Report of the World Bank Workshop on Sustainability Issues in Agriculture. (Davis, T.J., and I. Shirmer, (eds.).) Washington, DC: The World Bank.Google Scholar
  38. —. 1988.Environment and development: Implementing the World Bank's new policies. Washington, DC: The World Bank.Google Scholar
  39. World Commission on Environment and Development. 1987.Our common future. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  40. World Resources Institute and the International Institute for Environment and Development. Robert Repetto (ed.). 1985.The global possible. Resources, development, and the new century. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • Charles V. Kidd
    • 1
  1. 1.American Association for the Advancement of ScienceWashington, DCUSA

Personalised recommendations