Skip to main content
Log in

Interaction studies in mice of SCH 29851, a potential nonsedating antihistamine, with commonly used therapeutic agents

  • Histamine and Kinins
  • Published:
Agents and Actions Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

SCH 29851 was studied for its ability to interact with selected drugs used in man. The non-sedating antihistamine terfenadine and the sedating antihistamine diphenhydramine were also studied for comparison.

SCH 29851 at 80 mg/kg po in mice, a dose about 50 times its ED50 for blocking histamine-induced paw edema in the same species, potentiated the anticonvulsant effects of diazepam. At the high dose of 320 mg/kg po, about 80 times its ED50 for antihistamine effects, SCH 29851 potentiated the ability of high doses of ethanol and hexobarbital to induce loss of righting reflexes (LRR). However, no potentiation was seen when SCH 29851 was studied with lower doses of ethanol or phenobarbital that had anticonvulsant effects but did not cause LRR. At this high dose of 320 mg/kg po, SCH 29851 also did not interact with the antihypertensive drugs propranolol and α-methyldopa, the anti-ulcer drug cimetidine, the nasal decongestant pseudoephedrine, or the CNS stimulant d-amphetamine.

A nearly identical profile of interactions was seen with terfenadine, including potentiation of diazepam at 50 times its antihistamine ED50, potentiation of ethanol- and barbiturate-induced LRR at 80 times its antihistamine ED50, and lack of interaction effects at 320 mg/kg po with each of the other tested drugs.

The demonstration in this study of the significant interactions between diphenhydramine and many of the tested drugs is consistent with the clinical experience in man that this drug does have sedating properties and significant interactions with drugs like ethanol and diazepam.

The similarity of the results obtained in this study with SCH 29851 and terfenedine suggests that these drugs will not differ significantly in clinical use. It seems likely, therefore, that antihistaminic effects will be achieved without significant sedative-hypnotic actions or interactions with drugs commonly used in man, e.g. ethanol, barbituates, and benzodizepines. However, confirmation of this prediction necessarily awaits the results of clinical trials.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. A. Barnett, L.C. Iorio, W. Kreutner, S. Tozzi, H.S. Ahn andA. Gulbenkian,Evaluation of the CNS properties of SCH 29851, a potential non-sedating antihistamine, Agents and Actions14, 590–597 (1984).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. V.K. Kulshrestha, P.P. Gupta, P. Turner andP. Wadsworth,Some clinical pharmacological studies with terfenadine, a new antihistamine drug, Br. J. Clin. Pharmac.6, 25–29 (1978).

    Google Scholar 

  3. C.H. Clarke andA.N. Nicholson,Performance studies with antihistamines, Br. J. Clin. Pharmac.6, 31–35 (1978).

    Google Scholar 

  4. L. Moser, K.J. Huther, J. Koch-Weser andP.V. Lundt,Effects of terfenadine and diphenhydramine alone or in combination with diazepam or alcohol on psychomotor performance and subjective feeling, Eur. J. Clin. Pharmacol.14, 417–423 (1978).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. M.L. Brandon andM. Weiner,Clinical investigation of terfenadine, a non-sedating antihistamine, Ann. Allergy44, 71–75 (1980).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. F.E. Roth andI.I.A. Tabachnick.Histamine and antihistamines. In:Drill's Pharmacology in Medicine, 4th edn, pp. 995–1020 (Ed.J.R. Dipalma). McGraw Hill, Inc., Philadelphia (1971).

    Google Scholar 

  7. K.J. Melville,Antihistamine drugs. In: Histamine and Antihistamine, vol. 1, pp. 156–157 (Ed.M. Schacter). Pergamon Press, New York (1973).

    Google Scholar 

  8. J. Toman, E. Swinyard andL.S. Goodman,Properties of maximal seizures and their alteration by anticonvulsant drugs and other agents, J. Neurophysiol.9, 231–239 (1946).

    Google Scholar 

  9. S. Irwin,Drug screening and evaluation of new drugs in animals. In:Animal and Clinical Pharmacologic Techniques in Drug Evaluation, pp. 36–54 (EdsJ.M. Nodine andP.E. Siegler). Year Book Medical Publishers Inc., Chicago (1964).

    Google Scholar 

  10. D.J. Finney,Probit Analysis, 2nd edn. Cambridge, University Press (1962).

    Google Scholar 

  11. D.J. Finney,Statistical Methods in Biological Assay, 2nd Edition. London: Griffin Press (1971).

    Google Scholar 

  12. S. Siegel,Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences, New York McGraw-Hill Book Co. (1956).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Iorio, L.C., Cohen-Winston, M. & Barnett, A. Interaction studies in mice of SCH 29851, a potential nonsedating antihistamine, with commonly used therapeutic agents. Agents and Actions 18, 485–493 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01964951

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01964951

Keywords

Navigation