Advertisement

Experientia

, Volume 35, Issue 3, pp 312–313 | Cite as

Y chromosome in the sibling speciesAnopheles atroparvus (van Thiel, 1927) andA. labranchiae (Falleroni, 1926) (Diptera: Culicidae): Differential behaviour of the short arm after acid-alkaline treatment and Coriphosphine-O staining

  • R. Mezzanotte
  • L. Ferrucci
  • A. Marchi
Specialia

Summary

An acid-alkaline treatment followed by Coriphosphine-O staining was used for detecting chromosomal differences between the 2 sibling speciesAnopheles atroparvus (van Thiel) andA. labranchiae (Falleroni) (Diptera: Culicidae). The short arm of the Y chromosome was found to stain differently in the 2 species.

Keywords

Differential Behaviour Chromosomal Difference 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 2.
    U. Bianchi, Riv. Parasit.29, 221 (1968).Google Scholar
  2. 3.
    J.B. Kitzmiller, Adv. Genet.18, 315 (1976).Google Scholar
  3. 4.
    G. Frizzi, Scientia genet.3, 67 (1947).Google Scholar
  4. 5.
    J.B. Kitzmiller, G. Frizzi and R.H. Baker, in: Genetics of Insect Vectors of Disease, p. 151. Ed. J.W. Wright and R. Pal. Elsevier, London 1967.Google Scholar
  5. 6.
    U. Bianchi, Nature Lond.217, 382 (1968).Google Scholar
  6. 7.
    M. Coluzzi, Misc. Publs ent. Soc. Am.7, 63 (1970).Google Scholar
  7. 8.
    A. Corradetti, Riv. Malar.13, 707 (1934).Google Scholar
  8. 9.
    M. Fraccaro, L. Tiepolo, U. Laudani, A. Marchi and S.D. Jayakar, Nature, Lond.265, 326 (1977).Google Scholar
  9. 10.
    R. Mezzanotte and L. Ferrucci, It. J. Zool., in press.Google Scholar
  10. 11.
    L. Tiepolo, G. Diaz and U. Laudani, Chromosoma45, 81 (1974).Google Scholar
  11. 12.
    M. Fraccaro, U. Laudani, A. Marchi and L. Tiepolo, Chromosoma55, 27 (1976).Google Scholar
  12. 13.
    A. Farci, U. Laudani and A.R. Lecis, Z. zool. Syst. Evolut.-ForschII, 304 (1973).Google Scholar
  13. 14.
    F.E. Arrighi and T.C. Hsu, Cytogenetics10, 81 (1971).Google Scholar
  14. 15.
    S. Pimpinelli, G. Santini and M. Gatti, Chromosoma57, 377 (1976).Google Scholar
  15. 16.
    S.A. Keeble and R.F. Jay, Nature, Lond.193, 695 (1962).Google Scholar
  16. 17.
    D. Nash and W. Plaut, J. Cell Biol.27, 682 (1966).Google Scholar
  17. 18.
    J.E. Mayfield and J.R. Ellison, Chromosoma52, 37 (1975).Google Scholar
  18. 19.
    F.H. Kasten, in: Encycl. of Microscopy and Microtechnique, p. 5. Ed. P. Gray. Van Nostrand, New York 1973.Google Scholar
  19. 20.
    C.A. Thomas, Jr, and K.J. Berns, J. molec. Biol.4, 309 (1962).Google Scholar
  20. 21.
    R. Rigler, D. Killander, L. Bolund, and N.R. Ringertz, Exp. Cell Res.55, 215 (1969).Google Scholar
  21. 22.
    S.D. Jayakar, U. Laudani, A. Marchi, L. Tiepolo and M. Fraccaro, J. Genet.63, 1 (1977).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Birkhäuser Verlag 1978

Authors and Affiliations

  • R. Mezzanotte
    • 1
  • L. Ferrucci
    • 1
  • A. Marchi
    • 1
  1. 1.Istituto di Biologia Generale, Facoltà di Medicina e ChirurgiaUniversità di CagliariCagliariItalia

Personalised recommendations