Skip to main content
Log in

The implications for europe of revised FDA guidelines for clinical trials with anti-infective agents

  • Published:
European Journal of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article summarizes the current collaborative effort between the US Food und Drug Administration and the Infectious Diseases Society of America for the purpose of generating new General and Disease/Organism Specific Guidelines for the evaluation of anti-infective agents. Examples of proposed changes from draft documents are presented. The final documents may assist European colleagues in their efforts to establish a standardized new drug registration process by 1992. An area of mutual interest is the acceptability of safety and efficacy data from international clinical trials. In the interest of human and financial economies, both US and European Guidelines need to clarify the conditions, or criteria, for the conduct of valid ‘off-shore’ clinical trials.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. US Food and Drug Administration: General considerations for the clinical evaluation of drugs. Publication No. FDA 77-3040. US Department of Health, Education and Welfare, Washington DC, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  2. US Food and Drug Administration: Guidelines for the clinical evaluation of anti-infective drugs (systemic) (adults and children). Publication No. FDA 77-3046. US Department of Health, Education and Welfare, Washington DC, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Gilbert DN: Guidelines for evaluating new anti-microbial agents. Journal of Infectious Diseases 1987, 156: 934–941.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Kessler DA: The regulation of investigational drugs. New England Journal of Medicine 1989, 320: 281–288.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Miller HI, Young FE: The drug approval process at the Food and Drug Administration. Archives of Internal Medicine 1989, 149: 655–657.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Molecules and markets. A survey of pharmaceuticals. The Economist 1987, 303: 3–14.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Fihn SD, Stamm WE: Interpretation and comparison of treatment studies for uncomplicated urinary tract infections in women. Reviews of Infectious Diseases 1985, 7: 468–478.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Diamond GA, Forrester JS: Clinical trials and statistical verdicts: probable grounds for appeal. Annals of Internal Medicine 1983, 98: 385–394.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Der Simonian R, Charette LJ, McPeek B, Mosteller F: Reporting on methods in clinical trials. New England Journal of Medicine 1982, 306: 1332–1337.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Solomkin JS, Meakins JL, Allo MD, Dellinger EP, Simmons RL: Antibiotic trials in intra-abdominal infections. A critical evaluation of study design and outcome reporting. Annals of Surgery 1984, 29–39.

  11. Autman K, Amato D, Wood W, Corson J, Suit H, Proppe K, Carey R, Greenberger J, Wilson R, Frei E: Selection bias in clinical trials. Journal of Clinical Oncology 1985, 3: 1142–1147.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Norrby R: Quality of antibiotic clinical trials. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy 1984, 14: 205–208.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Feinstein A: Experimental requirement and scientific principles in case-control studies. Journal of Chronic Disease 1985, 38: 127–133.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Solomkin JS, Dellinger P, Christou NV, Mason AD: Design and conduct of antibiotic trials. Archives of Surgery 1987, 122: 158–164.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Polk RE, Hepler CD: Controversies in antimicrobial therapy: critical analysis of clinical trials. American Journal of Hospital Pharmacy 1986, 43: 630–640.

    Google Scholar 

  16. MacArthur RD, Jackson GG: An evaluation of the use of statistical methodology in the Journal of Infectious Diseases. Journal of Infectious Diseases 1984, 149: 349–354.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Freiman JA, Chalmers TC, Smith H, Kuebler RR: The importance of beta, the type II error and sample size in the design and interpretation of the randomized control trial. New England Journal of Medicine 1978, 2979: 690–694.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Huitfeldt B: Statistical aspects of clinical trials of antibiotics in acute infections. Reviews of Infectious Diseases 1986, 8, Supplement 3: 350–357.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Young MJ, Bresnitz EA, Strom BL: Sample size nomograms for interpreting negative clinical studies. Annals of Internal Medicine 1983, 99: 248–251.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Scheld WM, Sande MA: Endocarditis and intravascular infections. In: Mandell GL, Douglas RG, Bennett JE (ed): Principles and practice of infectious diseases. Churchill Livingstone, New York, 1990, p. 670–706.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Working Party of the British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy: The clinical evaluation of antibacterial drugs. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy 1989, 23, Supplement B: 1–42.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gilbert, D.N., Beam, T.R. & Kunin, C.M. The implications for europe of revised FDA guidelines for clinical trials with anti-infective agents. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 9, 552–558 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01964302

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01964302

Keywords

Navigation