Skip to main content
Log in

Abstract

Clinical trials to test antibiotics are normally of a less than satisfactory quality. Examples of common errors in the design and execution of trials with antibiotics are inclusion of too few patients to allow conclusions to be drawn, open uncontrolled design leading to a risk of considerable investigator bias, and inclusion of heterogeneous patient samples. This article suggests minimum requirements for antibiotic studies. Guidelines for such trials are needed and should have the widest possible international application in order to permit studies involving centres in various countries and to reduce the costs for development of new drugs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. US Food and Drug Administration: General considerations for the clinical evaluation of drugs. Publication No. (HEW) FDA-77-3040. US Department of health, Education and Welfare, Washington DC, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Working Party of the British Society of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy: The clinical evaluation of antibacterial drugs. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy 1989, 23, Supplement B: 1–42.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Finch RG: Clinical evaluation of antibacterial drugs: guidelines of the British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. European Journal of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases 1990, 9: 542–547.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Fihn SD, Stamm WE: Interpretation and comparison of treatment studies for uncomplicated urinary tract infections in women. Reviews of Infectious Diseases 1985, 7: 468–478.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Huitfeldt B: Statistical aspects of clinical trials ofantibiotics in acute infections. Reviews of Infectious Diseases 1986, 8, 3: 350–357.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Young MJ, Bresnitz EA, Strom BL: Sample size nomograms for interpreting negative clinical trials. Annals of Internal Medicine 1983, 99: 258–251.

    Google Scholar 

  7. The Urinary Tract Infection Study Group: Coordinated multicenter study of norfloxacin versus trimethoprimsulfamethoxazole treatments of symptomatic urinary tract ionfections. Journal of Infectious Diseases 1987, 155: 170–177.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Gilbert DN, Beam TR, Kunin CM: The implications for Europe of revised FDA guidelines for clinical trials with antiinfective agents. European Journal of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases 1990, 9: 552–558.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Norrby, S.R. The design of clinical trials with antibiotics. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 9, 523–529 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01964296

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01964296

Keywords

Navigation