Skip to main content
Log in

European standards for antibiotic susceptibility testing: Towards a theoretical consensus

  • Published:
European Journal of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Six different systems for antimicrobial susceptibility testing are used in Europe (BSAC, DIN, SFM, SIR, NCCLS and WRG). Breakpoints defining susceptibility or resistance of bacteria to antimicrobial agents remain the subject of discussion. Nevertheless, it is possible to establish a theoretical consensus standard list of breakpoints such that more than 95 % of the breakpoints proposed by the different systems differ from the consensus standard by no more than one dilution. In general, the BSAC and DIN systems recommend lower breakpoints, and the SFM and NCCLS systems higher breakpoints than the consensus standard. Two-thirds of the discrepancies are related to the breakpoints defining susceptibility. The breakpoint for susceptibility should reflect the intrinsic susceptibility of the isolate (absence of mechanisms of resistance), and the breakpoint for resistance the pharmacological potential of the drug. The scientific validation of breakpoints requires clinical verification.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Murray PR: Clinical predictive value of in vitro susceptibility tests. Clinical Microbiology Newsletter 1990, 12: 44–45.

    Google Scholar 

  2. The Swedish Reference Group for Antibiotics: A revised system for antibiotic sensitivity testing. Scandinavian Journal of Infectious Diseases 1981, 13: 148–152.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Deutsches Institut für Normung: Methoden zur Empfindlichkeitsprüfung von bakteriellen Krankheitserregern (außer Mycobacterien) gegen Chemotherapeutika. DIN 58940, 1984.

  4. Werkgroep Richtlijnen Govoeligheidsbepalingen Report: Standaardisatie van Geoveligheidsbepalingen. WRG, Bilthoven, 1981.

  5. Working Party of the British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy: Breakpoints in in vitro antibiotic sensitivity testing. Journal of antimicrobial Chemotherapy 1988, 21: 701–710.

    Google Scholar 

  6. European Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards: Guidelines for antimicrobial susceptibility testing by diffusion methods. ECCLS, Lund, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Courvalin P, Goldstein F, Philippon A, Sirot J, (ed): L'antibiogramme. MPC-Videon, Paris, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  8. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards: Methods for dilution antimicrobial susceptibility tests for bacteria that grow aerobically. Approved Standard M2-T4. NCCLS, Vilanova, PA, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Baquero F, Reig M: Mechanisms of antimicrobial resistance in anerobic bacteria: the predictive approach. Scandinavian Journal of Infectious Diseases 1989, Supplement 62: 25–28.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Scavizzi MR, Bronner FD: A statistical model for the interpretation of antibiotic susceptibility tests. International Journal of Experimental and Clinical Chemotherapy 1988, 1: 23–42.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Novick WJ: Development of in vitro susceptibility testing criteria and quality control parameters. Clinical Microbiology Newsletter 1989, 8: 60–62.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Baquero, F. European standards for antibiotic susceptibility testing: Towards a theoretical consensus. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 9, 492–495 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01964289

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01964289

Keywords

Navigation