Skip to main content
Log in

Chemical defense of crinoids by polyketide sulphates

  • Specialia
  • Published:
Experientia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The range of (presumed) polyketide constituents in comatalid crinoids has been extended to include bianthronyls, meso-naphthodianthrones and sulphate esters of various of the polyketides. Several species of fish are deterred from eating food by the inclusion in it of these sulphates at the concentration found in crinoids. Sodium 2-hydroxy-anthraquinone sulphate and anthraquinone-2-suphonate were also active as antifeedants for the species tested.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. R.A. Kent, I.R. Smith and M.D. Sutherland, Aust. J. Chem.23, 2325 (1970); I.R. Smith and M.D. Sutherland, Aust. J. Chem.24, 1487 (1971).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. M.D. Sutherland and J.W. Wells, Chemy Ind.1959, 291; M.D. Sutherland and J.W. Wells, Aust. J. Chem.20, 515 (1967); V.H. Powell, M.D. Sutherland and J.W. Wells, Aust. J. Chem.20, 535 (1967).

  3. T.R. Erdman and R.H. Thomson, J. chem. Soc., Perkin Trans.2, 1291 (1972); T. Matsuno, K. Fugitani, S. Takeda, K. Yokota and S. Yoshimizu, Chem. pharm. Bull.20, 1079 (1972).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. The trivial name crinemodin is suggested for11 isolated fromComanthus bennetti by G.L. Bartolini, T.R. Erdman and P.J. Scheuer (Tetrahedron29, 3699 (1973)) and by us fromPtilometra australis (Wilton) and from many other crinoid species so that with rhodoptilometrin, it is one of the commonest crinoidal polyketides.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. V.H. Powell and M.D. Sutherland, Aust. J. Chem.20, 541 (1967).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. R.L.A. Catala, in: Carnival under the Sea, p. 61. N.R. Sicard, Paris 1964; L.H. Hyman, in: The Invertebrates, Vol. IV, p. 101. McGraw-Hill, New York 1955; D.L. Meyer, Bull. marine Sci.23, 244 (1975).

    Google Scholar 

  7. e.g., J.E. Randall, Stud. trop. Oceanogr., Miami5, 665 (1967); R.W. Hiatt and D.W. Strasburg, Ecol. Monogr.30, 65 (1960); R.H. Lowe, J. Linn. Soc. London Zool.;44, 669 (1962).

    Google Scholar 

  8. For the views of H.L. Clark, A.H. Clark and T. Mortensen, see H.B. Fell in: Physiology of Echinodermata, p. 53. Ed. R.A. Boolootian, Interscience, New York 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Exceptions have been observed by Ms J. Marshall of the Australian Museum who has encountered a fish eatingColobometra perspinosa and Mr A. Birtles of the James Cook University of North Queensland who has witnessed attacks onAmphimetra tessellata tessellata (personal communications to J.A.R.).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Acknowledgments. This author is indebted to the Australian Research Grants Commission for financial support, to Miss A. Clark of the British Museum of Natural History, London, and Ms J. Marshall of the Australian Museum, Sydney, for identifications of crinoid specimens and to Mr C. Lee, Director of the Deception Bay Laboratory of the Qld. Fisheries Service for providing facilities, fish and valuable advice.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rideout, J.A., Smith, N.B. & Sutherland, M.D. Chemical defense of crinoids by polyketide sulphates. Experientia 35, 1273–1274 (1979). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01963951

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01963951

Keywords

Navigation