Skip to main content
Log in

Epidemiology of diphtheria: Polypeptide and restriction enzyme analysis in comparison with conventional phage typing

  • Current Topic: Article
  • Published:
European Journal of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Several methods for epidemiological typing ofCorynebacterium diphtheriae were compared with the well accepted phage typing analysis. For this purpose, isolates from outbreaks of diphtheria in specific areas of the FRG and Sweden were analyzed by phage typing, their bacterial polypeptide profiles were examined and their phage-DNA restriction enzyme patterns were compared. All techniques were able to identify whether certain outbreaks were epidemiologically linked or not. Phage typing and phage-DNA restriction enzyme fragment analysis were limited in their application to lysogenic strains, whereas bacterial polypeptide analysis was universally applicable. Analysis of bacterial polypeptides was superior to all methods, especially in terms of speed and simplicity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Naumann, P., Krech, T., Maximescu, P., Adamek, H., Retzgen, B., Hartmann, G., Bleckmann, M. Phagenlysotypie and Epidemiologie der Diphtherie-Erkrankungen 1975–1984. Deutsche Medizinische Wochenschrift 1986, 111: 228–292.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Christenson, B. Is diphtheria coming back? Annals of Clinical Research 1986, 18: 69–70.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Saragea, A., Maximescu, P., Meitert, E. Corynebacterium diphtheriae: microbiological methods used in clinical and epidemiological investigations. Methods in Microbiology 1979, 13: 61–76.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Carlone, G. M., Sottnek, F. O., Plikaytis, B. D. Comparison of outer membrane protein and biochemical profiles ofHaemophilus aegypticus andHaemophilus influenzae biotype III. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 1985, 22: 708–713.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Mulligan, M. E., Halebian, S., Kwok, R. Y. Y., Cheng, W. C., Finegold, S. M., Anselmo, C. R., Gerding, D. N., Peterson, L. R. Bacterial agglutination and polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis for typingClostridium difficile. Journal of Infectious Diseases 1986, 153: 267–271.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Laemmli, U. K. Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature 1970, 227: 680–685.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Maniatis, T., Fritsch, E. F., Sambrook, J.: Molecular cloning. Cold Spring Harbour Laboratory, 1982, p. 98–106, 458–463.

  8. Buck, G. A., Cross, R. E., Wong, T. P., Loera, J., Groman, N. DNA relationships among some tox gene bearing corynebacteriophages. Infection and Immunity 1985, 49: 679–684.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Rappuoli, R., Perugini, M., Ratti, G. DNA element ofCorynebacterium diphtheriae with properties of an insertion sequence and usefulness for epidemiological studies. Journal of Bacteriology 1987, 169: 308–312.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Pappenheimer, A. M., Murphy, J. R. Studies on the molecular epidemiology of diphtheria. Lancet 1983, ii: 923–926.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Krech, T., de Chastonay, J. & Falsen, E. Epidemiology of diphtheria: Polypeptide and restriction enzyme analysis in comparison with conventional phage typing. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 7, 232–237 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01963094

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01963094

Keywords

Navigation