Skip to main content
Log in

Comparative in vitro activity of the new oral cephalosporin cefixime

  • New Antimicrobial Agents
  • Published:
European Journal of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Cefixime was 8 to 10 times more active than cefaclor and augmentin against isolates ofEscherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae andSalmonella typhi, MIC90 values ranging from 0.06 to 0.25 µg/ml. However, none of these three drugs was particularly active against isolates of more resistant gram-negative bacilli such asEnterobacter, Serratia, Citrobacter, Acinetobacter, Providencia andAchromobacter spp. The lowest MIC values for gram-negative bacilli were seen with ciprofloxacin, except for isolates ofAcinetobacter, where cotrimoxazole was the most active of the five drugs studied. Augmentin and ciprofloxacin exhibited the lowest MICs for isolates of streptococci and corynebacteria. Although cefixime may be among the most active oral betalactam drugs, it does not appear to be useful for treatment of infections caused by more resistant gram-negative bacilli.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Silver, M. S., Counts, G. W., Zeleznik, D., Turck, M. Comparison of in vitro antibacterial activity of three oral cephalosporins: cefaclor, cephalexin, and cephradine. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 1977, 12: 591–596.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Brittain, D. C., Scully, R. E., Hirose, T., Neu, H. C. The pharmacokinetic and bactericidal characteristics of oral cefixime. Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics 1985, 38: 590–594.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Neu, H. C., Chin, N., Lobthavikul, P. Comparative in vitro activity and beta-lactamase stability of FR 17027, a new orally active cephalosporin. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 1984, 26: 174–180.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards Methods for dilution antimicrobial susceptibility tests for bacteria that grow aerobically. Tentative standard. M7-T. National Committee for Laboratory Standards, Villanova, PA, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Steers, E., Foltz, E. L., Graves, B. S. An inocula replicating apparatus for routine testing of bacterial susceptibility to antibiotics. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 1959, 9: 307–311.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Mulligan, M. E., Kwok, Y. Y. In vitro activity of cefixime and six other agents against nosocomial pathogens of theEnterobacteriaceae family. Infection Control 1987, 8: 241–244.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Bergeron, M. G., Tucotte, A. Penetration of cefixime into fibrin clots and in vivo efficacy againstEscherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, andStaphylococcus aureus. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 1986, 30: 913–916.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Leitner, F., Pursiano, T. A., Buck, R. E., Tsai, Y. H., Chisolm, D. R., Misiek, M., Desiderio, J. V., Kessler, R. E. BMY 28100, a new oral cephalosporin. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 1987, 31: 238–243.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Counts, G.W., Baugher, L.K., Ulness, B.K. et al. Comparative in vitro activity of the new oral cephalosporin cefixime. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 7, 428–431 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01962357

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01962357

Keywords

Navigation