Dana, R. H., and Fouke, H. P., Barnum statements in report of psychological assessment. Psychol. Rep.44 (1979) 1215–1221.
Delaney, J. G., and Woodyard, H. D., Effects of reading an astrological description on responding to a personality inventory. Psychol. Rep.,34 (1974) 1214.
Dickson, D. H. and Kelly, I. W., The ‘Barnum Effect’ in personality assessment: a review of the literature. Psychol. Rep.57 (1985) 367–382.
Dies, R. R., Personal gullibility or pseudodiagnosis: a further test of the ‘fallacy of personal validation.’ J. clin. Psych.28 (1972) 47–50.
Dmitruk, V. M., Collins, R. W., and Clinger, D. L., The ‘Barnum Effect’ and acceptance of negative personal evaluation. J. Consult. Clin. Psych.41 (1973) 192–194.
Fichten, C. S., and Sunerton, B., Popular horoscopes and the ‘Barnum Effect.’ J. Psych.114 (1983) 123–134.
Forer, B. R., The fallacy of personal validation: a classroom study of gullibility. J. Abnorm. Soc. Psychol.44 (1949) 118–123.
Forer, B. R., Personal validation and the person. Psychol. Rep.23 (1968) 1214.
Gergen, K. J., The social construction of self-knowledge, in: The Self: Psychological and Philosophical Issues. Ed. T. Mischel. Blackwell, Oxford 1977.
Halperin, K., Snyder, C. R., Shenkel, R. J., and Houston, B. K., Effects of source status and message favorability on acceptance of persoality feedback. J. appl. Psychol.61 (1976) 85–88.
Hyman, R., Cold reading: how to convince strangers that you know all about them. Skeptical Inquirer1 (1977) 18–37.
Hyman, R., The psychic reading, in: The Clever Hans Phenomenon, pp. 169–181. Eds R. A. Sebeok and R. Rosenthal. Academy of Sciences, New York 1981.
Larsen, W. W., Sr., The Mental Mysteries and Other Writings. Ed. W. W. Larsen, Jr. Genii Publishing, Los Angeles 1977.
Manning, E. J., Personal validation: Personal validation: replication of Forer's study. Psychol. Rep.23 (1968) 181–182.
Marks, D., Investigating the paranormal. Nature320 (1986) 119–124.
Marks, D., and Kammann, R., The Psychology of the Psychic. Prometheus Books, Buffalo, N.Y. 1980.
Marks, D., and McKellar, P., The nature and function of eidetic imagery. J. ment. Imagery6 (1982) 1–124.
Marks, P. A., and Seemann, W., On the Barnum effect. Psychol. Rec.12 (1962) 203–208.
Meehl, P. E., Wanted — a good cookbook. Am. Psychol.11 (1956), 262–272.
Randi, J., Cold reading revisited. Skeptical Inquirer3 (1979) 37–41.
Rosen, G., Effects of source prestige on subjects' acceptance of the Barnum effect: psychologist versus astrologer. J. Consult. clin. Psych.43 (1975) 95.
Silverman, B. I., Studies of astrology. J. Psych.77 (1971) 141–149.
Snyder, C. R., Acceptance of personality interpretations as a function of assessment procedures. J. Consult. clin. Psychol.42 (1974) 150.
Snyder, C. R., Why horoscopes are true: the effect of specificity on acceptance of astrological interpretations. J. clin. Psychol.30 (1974) 577–580.
Snyder, C. R., and Larson, G. R., A further look at student acceptance of general personality interpretations. J. Consult. clin. Psychol.38 (1972) 382–388.
Synder, C. R., Larsen, D. L., and Bloom, L. J., Acceptance of general personality interpretations prior to and after receipt of diagnostic feedback supposedly based on psychological, graphological, and astrological assessment procedures. J. clin. Psychol.32 (1976) 258–265.
Snyder, C. R., and Shenkel, R. J., Effects of favorability, modality, relevance on acceptance of general personality interpretations prior to and after receiving diagnostic feedback. J. Consult. clin. Psych.44 (1976) 34–41.
Snyder, C. R., and Shenkel, R. J., The P. T. Barnum effect. Psychol. Today8 (1975) 52–54.
Tyson, G. A., Why people perceive horoscopes as being true: a review. Bull. Br. psychol. Soc.35 (1982) 186–188.
Ulrich, R. E., Stachnik, T. J., and Stainton, N. R., Student acceptance of generalized personality interpretations. Psychol. Rep.13 (1963) 831–834.
Weisberg, P., Student acceptance of bogus personality interpretations differing in level of social desirability. Psychol. Rep.27 (1970) 743–746.