Skip to main content
Log in

The cold reading technique

  • Multi-author Review
  • Investigating the Paranormal
  • Published:
Experientia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

For many people, belief in the paranormal derives from personal experience of face-to-face interviews with astrologers, palm readers, aura and Tarot readers, and spirit mediums. These encounters typically involve cold reading, a process in which a reader makes calculated guesses about a client's background and problems and, depending on the reaction, elaborates a reading which seems to the client so uniquely appropriate that it carries with it the illusion of having been produced by paranormal means. The cold reading process is shown to depend initially on the Barnum effect, the tendency for people to embrace generalized personality descriptions as idiosyncratically their own. Psychological research into the Barnum effect is critically reviewed, and uses of the effect by a professional magician are described. This is followed by detailed analysis of the cold reading performances of a spirit medium. Future research should investigate the degree to which cold readers may have convinced themselves that they actually possess psychic or paranormal abilities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Dana, R. H., and Fouke, H. P., Barnum statements in report of psychological assessment. Psychol. Rep.44 (1979) 1215–1221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Delaney, J. G., and Woodyard, H. D., Effects of reading an astrological description on responding to a personality inventory. Psychol. Rep.,34 (1974) 1214.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Dickson, D. H. and Kelly, I. W., The ‘Barnum Effect’ in personality assessment: a review of the literature. Psychol. Rep.57 (1985) 367–382.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Dies, R. R., Personal gullibility or pseudodiagnosis: a further test of the ‘fallacy of personal validation.’ J. clin. Psych.28 (1972) 47–50.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Dmitruk, V. M., Collins, R. W., and Clinger, D. L., The ‘Barnum Effect’ and acceptance of negative personal evaluation. J. Consult. Clin. Psych.41 (1973) 192–194.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Fichten, C. S., and Sunerton, B., Popular horoscopes and the ‘Barnum Effect.’ J. Psych.114 (1983) 123–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Forer, B. R., The fallacy of personal validation: a classroom study of gullibility. J. Abnorm. Soc. Psychol.44 (1949) 118–123.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Forer, B. R., Personal validation and the person. Psychol. Rep.23 (1968) 1214.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Gergen, K. J., The social construction of self-knowledge, in: The Self: Psychological and Philosophical Issues. Ed. T. Mischel. Blackwell, Oxford 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Halperin, K., Snyder, C. R., Shenkel, R. J., and Houston, B. K., Effects of source status and message favorability on acceptance of persoality feedback. J. appl. Psychol.61 (1976) 85–88.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Hyman, R., Cold reading: how to convince strangers that you know all about them. Skeptical Inquirer1 (1977) 18–37.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Hyman, R., The psychic reading, in: The Clever Hans Phenomenon, pp. 169–181. Eds R. A. Sebeok and R. Rosenthal. Academy of Sciences, New York 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Larsen, W. W., Sr., The Mental Mysteries and Other Writings. Ed. W. W. Larsen, Jr. Genii Publishing, Los Angeles 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Manning, E. J., Personal validation: Personal validation: replication of Forer's study. Psychol. Rep.23 (1968) 181–182.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Marks, D., Investigating the paranormal. Nature320 (1986) 119–124.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Marks, D., and Kammann, R., The Psychology of the Psychic. Prometheus Books, Buffalo, N.Y. 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Marks, D., and McKellar, P., The nature and function of eidetic imagery. J. ment. Imagery6 (1982) 1–124.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Marks, P. A., and Seemann, W., On the Barnum effect. Psychol. Rec.12 (1962) 203–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Meehl, P. E., Wanted — a good cookbook. Am. Psychol.11 (1956), 262–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Randi, J., Cold reading revisited. Skeptical Inquirer3 (1979) 37–41.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Rosen, G., Effects of source prestige on subjects' acceptance of the Barnum effect: psychologist versus astrologer. J. Consult. clin. Psych.43 (1975) 95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Silverman, B. I., Studies of astrology. J. Psych.77 (1971) 141–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Snyder, C. R., Acceptance of personality interpretations as a function of assessment procedures. J. Consult. clin. Psychol.42 (1974) 150.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Snyder, C. R., Why horoscopes are true: the effect of specificity on acceptance of astrological interpretations. J. clin. Psychol.30 (1974) 577–580.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Snyder, C. R., and Larson, G. R., A further look at student acceptance of general personality interpretations. J. Consult. clin. Psychol.38 (1972) 382–388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Synder, C. R., Larsen, D. L., and Bloom, L. J., Acceptance of general personality interpretations prior to and after receipt of diagnostic feedback supposedly based on psychological, graphological, and astrological assessment procedures. J. clin. Psychol.32 (1976) 258–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Snyder, C. R., and Shenkel, R. J., Effects of favorability, modality, relevance on acceptance of general personality interpretations prior to and after receiving diagnostic feedback. J. Consult. clin. Psych.44 (1976) 34–41.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Snyder, C. R., and Shenkel, R. J., The P. T. Barnum effect. Psychol. Today8 (1975) 52–54.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Tyson, G. A., Why people perceive horoscopes as being true: a review. Bull. Br. psychol. Soc.35 (1982) 186–188.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Ulrich, R. E., Stachnik, T. J., and Stainton, N. R., Student acceptance of generalized personality interpretations. Psychol. Rep.13 (1963) 831–834.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Weisberg, P., Student acceptance of bogus personality interpretations differing in level of social desirability. Psychol. Rep.27 (1970) 743–746.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dutton, D.L. The cold reading technique. Experientia 44, 326–332 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01961271

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01961271

Key words

Navigation