Summary
For many people, belief in the paranormal derives from personal experience of face-to-face interviews with astrologers, palm readers, aura and Tarot readers, and spirit mediums. These encounters typically involve cold reading, a process in which a reader makes calculated guesses about a client's background and problems and, depending on the reaction, elaborates a reading which seems to the client so uniquely appropriate that it carries with it the illusion of having been produced by paranormal means. The cold reading process is shown to depend initially on the Barnum effect, the tendency for people to embrace generalized personality descriptions as idiosyncratically their own. Psychological research into the Barnum effect is critically reviewed, and uses of the effect by a professional magician are described. This is followed by detailed analysis of the cold reading performances of a spirit medium. Future research should investigate the degree to which cold readers may have convinced themselves that they actually possess psychic or paranormal abilities.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Dana, R. H., and Fouke, H. P., Barnum statements in report of psychological assessment. Psychol. Rep.44 (1979) 1215–1221.
Delaney, J. G., and Woodyard, H. D., Effects of reading an astrological description on responding to a personality inventory. Psychol. Rep.,34 (1974) 1214.
Dickson, D. H. and Kelly, I. W., The ‘Barnum Effect’ in personality assessment: a review of the literature. Psychol. Rep.57 (1985) 367–382.
Dies, R. R., Personal gullibility or pseudodiagnosis: a further test of the ‘fallacy of personal validation.’ J. clin. Psych.28 (1972) 47–50.
Dmitruk, V. M., Collins, R. W., and Clinger, D. L., The ‘Barnum Effect’ and acceptance of negative personal evaluation. J. Consult. Clin. Psych.41 (1973) 192–194.
Fichten, C. S., and Sunerton, B., Popular horoscopes and the ‘Barnum Effect.’ J. Psych.114 (1983) 123–134.
Forer, B. R., The fallacy of personal validation: a classroom study of gullibility. J. Abnorm. Soc. Psychol.44 (1949) 118–123.
Forer, B. R., Personal validation and the person. Psychol. Rep.23 (1968) 1214.
Gergen, K. J., The social construction of self-knowledge, in: The Self: Psychological and Philosophical Issues. Ed. T. Mischel. Blackwell, Oxford 1977.
Halperin, K., Snyder, C. R., Shenkel, R. J., and Houston, B. K., Effects of source status and message favorability on acceptance of persoality feedback. J. appl. Psychol.61 (1976) 85–88.
Hyman, R., Cold reading: how to convince strangers that you know all about them. Skeptical Inquirer1 (1977) 18–37.
Hyman, R., The psychic reading, in: The Clever Hans Phenomenon, pp. 169–181. Eds R. A. Sebeok and R. Rosenthal. Academy of Sciences, New York 1981.
Larsen, W. W., Sr., The Mental Mysteries and Other Writings. Ed. W. W. Larsen, Jr. Genii Publishing, Los Angeles 1977.
Manning, E. J., Personal validation: Personal validation: replication of Forer's study. Psychol. Rep.23 (1968) 181–182.
Marks, D., Investigating the paranormal. Nature320 (1986) 119–124.
Marks, D., and Kammann, R., The Psychology of the Psychic. Prometheus Books, Buffalo, N.Y. 1980.
Marks, D., and McKellar, P., The nature and function of eidetic imagery. J. ment. Imagery6 (1982) 1–124.
Marks, P. A., and Seemann, W., On the Barnum effect. Psychol. Rec.12 (1962) 203–208.
Meehl, P. E., Wanted — a good cookbook. Am. Psychol.11 (1956), 262–272.
Randi, J., Cold reading revisited. Skeptical Inquirer3 (1979) 37–41.
Rosen, G., Effects of source prestige on subjects' acceptance of the Barnum effect: psychologist versus astrologer. J. Consult. clin. Psych.43 (1975) 95.
Silverman, B. I., Studies of astrology. J. Psych.77 (1971) 141–149.
Snyder, C. R., Acceptance of personality interpretations as a function of assessment procedures. J. Consult. clin. Psychol.42 (1974) 150.
Snyder, C. R., Why horoscopes are true: the effect of specificity on acceptance of astrological interpretations. J. clin. Psychol.30 (1974) 577–580.
Snyder, C. R., and Larson, G. R., A further look at student acceptance of general personality interpretations. J. Consult. clin. Psychol.38 (1972) 382–388.
Synder, C. R., Larsen, D. L., and Bloom, L. J., Acceptance of general personality interpretations prior to and after receipt of diagnostic feedback supposedly based on psychological, graphological, and astrological assessment procedures. J. clin. Psychol.32 (1976) 258–265.
Snyder, C. R., and Shenkel, R. J., Effects of favorability, modality, relevance on acceptance of general personality interpretations prior to and after receiving diagnostic feedback. J. Consult. clin. Psych.44 (1976) 34–41.
Snyder, C. R., and Shenkel, R. J., The P. T. Barnum effect. Psychol. Today8 (1975) 52–54.
Tyson, G. A., Why people perceive horoscopes as being true: a review. Bull. Br. psychol. Soc.35 (1982) 186–188.
Ulrich, R. E., Stachnik, T. J., and Stainton, N. R., Student acceptance of generalized personality interpretations. Psychol. Rep.13 (1963) 831–834.
Weisberg, P., Student acceptance of bogus personality interpretations differing in level of social desirability. Psychol. Rep.27 (1970) 743–746.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Dutton, D.L. The cold reading technique. Experientia 44, 326–332 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01961271
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01961271